GG Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 I know crazy the guy has been gone for a month yet EJ, and MW were all b.c of Marrone. Couldn't be b.c EJ just isn't that good and MW just isn't that type of player. You should have seen that catch against the Vikings. How about that high point TD that are Hogan's specialties? 80-yard TD streaks? Those are great. Can't wait for the 2014 highlight film to come out. PS - we will stop blaming Marrone for the offensive ills, when the saint proves that he can run an NFL offense. (Obviously, you will have to wait a while for that) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 He will opt out after 15 minutes CBF Much laughter....thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 You should have seen that catch against the Vikings. Name another big catch thogh. The guy was invisible most games. Didn't even notice if he was on the field i have nothing against Hogan and think he's a good asset. But IMO they are two different players. I don't see why his ability to get on the field makes MW inactive. I understand ST but, MW did play ST when active. Oh I totally agree. MW was a big physical guy that could go up to get the ball. Would have been great to have him in the red zone. Why they didn't give him a shot boggles my mind. For whatever reason they wanted Hogan out there instead and he's not the same kind of physical receiver, he's more of a posession guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 (edited) Name another big catch thogh. The guy was invisible most games. Didn't even notice if he was on the field Oh I totally agree. MW was a big physical guy that could go up to get the ball. Would have been great to have him in the red zone. Why they didn't give him a shot boggles my mind. For whatever reason they wanted Hogan out there instead and he's not the same kind of physical receiver, he's more of a posession guy Sorry I didn't know there was a minimum on "big catches"... Dear god Just b.c you didn't notice him didn't mean he contributed nothing. Edited February 17, 2015 by Beef Jerky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Sorry I didn't know there was a minimum on "big catches"... Dear god How about more than one per season, if that's your role on the team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 I think we will find out. It wouldn't surprise me if the Bills show interest if it was a Marrone thing. Now with the Whaley/Marrone issue gone, Rex will be able to work with Whaley to put the best players on the field, not just Marrone's favorites. If we don't show interest, it could be a sign that MW was inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 (edited) How about more than one per season, if that's your role on the team?He made plenty of catches... Which was the roll of a WR... So b.c everyone of Watkins catches weren't "big catches" that means he wasn't very good either with his role on the team... Edited February 17, 2015 by Beef Jerky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaaadThingsMan Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Hogan is a yes man, recognizing he has been given an opportunity he walks the line. Williams is opinionated and speaks his mind which never sat well with Marrone the ego maniac. Not in college and certainly not with the Bills. Marrone holds grudges and it affects his personnel decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Well I guess we will see if anyone else is willing to take a chance on a head case whose best playing days are quite possibly behind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 He made plenty of catches... Which was the roll of a WR... So b.c everyone of Watkins catches weren't "big catches" that means he wasn't very good either with his role on the team... Hello, my name is Straw. If you collect enough of me, you can build a pretty cool figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 The WR? did he contribute in Buffalo this past season? not worried if he didn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Hello, my name is Straw. If you collect enough of me, you can build a pretty cool figure. Let me know when you get enough straw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Let me know when you get enough straw. You're the one cornering the market, so I don't know if I can ever get enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 You're the one cornering the market, so I don't know if I can ever get enough. He's using so many I'm nearing the last one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 So Goodwin was injured for part of the season, and KILLED on a defenseless reciever hit going over the middle, but why exactly were two, as I thought at the beginning of the year, relatively talented receivers, completely unproductive this year? If you had said the tow of them would combine for 9 catches for 184 yards, I would have called that way off base for even a worst case scenario, barring preseason IR designations. So I would very much want to know why the coaching staff preferred to not use these talented players, and in making those choices accepted the pretty anemic weekly output that regressed us to the Losman/ pre-Freddy offensive days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Marrone screwed up when it came to Mike Williams. The RZ offense had been bad under St. Doug. They go out and acquire a productive RZ target in MW and don't use him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaaadThingsMan Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 So Goodwin was injured for part of the season, and KILLED on a defenseless reciever hit going over the middle, but why exactly were two, as I thought at the beginning of the year, relatively talented receivers, completely unproductive this year? If you had said the tow of them would combine for 9 catches for 184 yards, I would have called that way off base for even a worst case scenario, barring preseason IR designations. So I would very much want to know why the coaching staff preferred to not use these talented players, and in making those choices accepted the pretty anemic weekly output that regressed us to the Losman/ pre-Freddy offensive days.Woods the Honey Badger even ended up in the Doughouse for some reason..maybe it is Morons fault? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 You love me and you know it. Yea, you've been a real charming character Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted February 17, 2015 Author Share Posted February 17, 2015 So Goodwin was injured for part of the season, and KILLED on a defenseless reciever hit going over the middle, but why exactly were two, as I thought at the beginning of the year, relatively talented receivers, completely unproductive this year? If you had said the tow of them would combine for 9 catches for 184 yards, I would have called that way off base for even a worst case scenario, barring preseason IR designations. So I would very much want to know why the coaching staff preferred to not use these talented players, and in making those choices accepted the pretty anemic weekly output that regressed us to the Losman/ pre-Freddy offensive days. Right - its a pattern. I know Goodwin is injury prone. Not denying this. But he was inactive when healthy. Marrone harped on availability but benched him when he was available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Woods the Honey Badger even ended up in the Doughouse for some reason..maybe it is Morons fault? Atleast they couldn't bench sammy.... Just use him as a decoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts