DC Tom Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 I'm not buying that. You trying to say the fat guy was the exemption to the rule? And yes they might be in custody at first but eventually they do get released and yet we still hear nothing. Eye-witnesses can't be counted on? Tell that to the courts. You can say SOME are unreliable. You can't say ALL of them are. I can say all of them are, because ALL of them are. Even the fat guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) I can say all of them are, because ALL of them are. Even the fat guys. Well then stop telling your account of 9/11. You were there, right? Your take is unreliable. Even the fat guys? Wow. Smh. Missed that point too. Why was he permitted to speak to the media if you're statement about in custody was 100% correct? Edited June 13, 2016 by Justice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) Just replace the word "Gay" with "illegal immigrants" and this could have been you. Serious question, define "arms". Armaments. Edited June 13, 2016 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 The most reliable eyewitness will be the video surveillance footage. The FBI clearing him twice after co workers reported him looks bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2016 Author Share Posted June 13, 2016 OBAMA: Orlando shooting was a case of ‘homegrown extremism,’ gunman inspired by online propaganda. An Islamic jihadi inspired by a self-described Caliphate in the Middle East is an example of “homegrown extremism,” because somehow, some way it’s always our fault. U.S. probes whether gunman in nightclub massacre had help https://www.yahoo.com/news/gunman-massacres-50-orlando-gay-club-worst-u-012509145.html?ref=gs The Orlando attack was the price of not destroying ISIS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 The Orlando attack was the price of not destroying ISIS. bull ****. This guy hated everybody. Destroying ISIS could just as easily have encouraged him, for all we know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 bull ****. This guy hated everybody. Destroying ISIS could just as easily have encouraged him, for all we know. Exactly. Hateful people are gonna find reasons to hate. It's as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observer Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) Yeah we can cut though all the BS by simply noticing that Obama expresses near zero determination to solve the problem. Obama wants to solve the problem of mass shootings just like you do. It's just the means of solving the problem where you disagree. Edited June 13, 2016 by Observer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Well then stop telling your account of 9/11. You were there, right? Your take is unreliable. Even the fat guys? Wow. Smh. Missed that point too. Why was he permitted to speak to the media if you're statement about in custody was 100% correct? I know it's unreliable. ALL witnesses are ****ty. He was probably "allowed" because he got out of the club early, before the police arrived and secured the area. Could be he wasn't even a witness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 bull ****. This guy hated everybody. Destroying ISIS could just as easily have encouraged him, for all we know. Seems that way to me. But the way he's being called a "terrorist" by every person in front of a camera or a keyboard is pretty blatant. If they can get every crime to be equated to terrorism then the war on terror (or it's funding and constitutional assaults) will live on forever. That's all I'm seeing in the way this story is being covered: Conditioning. Lots and lots of conditioning. Shameful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Armaments. Artillery such as Howitzers, bazookas, Heavy mortars, anti-tank guns and rocket artillery to name a few, should they be legal for private citizens as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Been perusing social media, and the left is more unhinged than I have seen them in hears. Their message: Ban guns. Ignore terrorists. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Artillery such as Howitzers, bazookas, Heavy mortars, anti-tank guns and rocket artillery to name a few, should they be legal for private citizens as well? Yep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Been perusing social media, and the left is more unhinged than I have seen them in hears. Their message: Ban guns. Ignore terrorists. Unbelievable. That's how they roll. Yep. Nuclear armaments as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 That's how they roll. Nuclear armaments as well? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 I know it's unreliable. ALL witnesses are ****ty. He was probably "allowed" because he got out of the club early, before the police arrived and secured the area. Could be he wasn't even a witness. He was a witness and he spoke again today. He spoke during the night and during sunrise. That makes 3 times now that he's spoken. Here's his interview from today. http://abcnews.go.com/US/orlando-shooting-survivor-recounts-moments-gunfire-off-club/story?id=39813398 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 bull ****. This guy hated everybody. Destroying ISIS could just as easily have encouraged him, for all we know. Considering what 'set him off' was supposedly seeing two guys kissing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Seems that way to me. But the way he's being called a "terrorist" by every person in front of a camera or a keyboard is pretty blatant. If they can get every crime to be equated to terrorism then the war on terror (or it's funding and constitutional assaults) will live on forever. That's all I'm seeing in the way this story is being covered: Conditioning. Lots and lots of conditioning. Shameful. Pretty much. Though the conditioning of "crime = terrorism" has been going on for years now. I'm very nauseated by it, and about done fighting it, since no one listens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What a Tuel Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 That's how they roll. Nuclear armaments as well? Does this line of questioning typically end in a denial that a slippery slope for gun laws exists? Handguns kill far more people in the United States than Assault Weapons. Like 98-99% handgun to 1-2% Assault Weapons. People are upset about gun violence and are seeking to solve the problem through assault weapon bans but promise not to take away handguns which are the weapon used to commit the violence..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Does this line of questioning typically end in a denial that a slippery slope for gun laws exists? Handguns kill far more people in the United States than Assault Weapons. Like 98-99% handgun to 1-2% Assault Weapons. People are upset about gun violence and are seeking to solve the problem through assault weapon bans but promise not to take away handguns which are the weapon used to commit the violence..... Quit obfuscating with details Leftys don't let silly stuff like facts or logic get in the way of a good rant. There's a problem and they have a solution. Not necessarily a valid solution but they'd rather feel like they are part of the solution and lecture you that you are part of the problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts