bbb Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 How would 61% NOT do this trade?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtDart Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 In hindsight. Basically, would you have trade those 4 players for Luck. That's basically the 1st and 2nd the year Luck came out and the next 3 1sts. I'm not saying I know that would get it done, but I feel like it's in the ballpark. Personally, I'd do it. EJ isn't a loss if we have Luck. Gilmore isn't the shutdown corner we thought he'd be. Glenn is still a question mark. I always find it interesting to look at trades involving picks after the picks have been made. To me, this is a no brainer. Just fun speculation Oh no!!!!!!!Here we go.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delete This Account Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 yes, this will never happen. jw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spillerhighlife Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I voted for Luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Strangely the bulk of those who voted in the poll say they'd be against it. I didn't vote as, in the words of Maude Lebowski, the plot is ludicrous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garion Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Looking at the RG3 trade after a year you would say the Redskins would do it every time. Now not so much, and as of now the Rams really haven't gotten much. I agree with most of this but I vote no. Luck blows out his knee where are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdk Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 why are you wasting our time with this stuff....... +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 why are you wasting our time with this stuff....... +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I don't think there is any trade colts would have listened to. They tanked an entire season for that one guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prissythecat Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I don't think there is any trade colts would have listened to. They tanked an entire season for that one guy. Jim Caldwell and the Polians purposely tanked and lost their jobs for the sake of the Colts... Gotcha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Jim Caldwell and the Polians purposely tanked and lost their jobs for the sake of the Colts... Gotcha. The guy calling the shots there couldn't be fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Enough already with daddy's little boy Luck. You guys want to trade half of our team for a loser who puts up some regular season stats against the Jaguars and TURNS THE BALL OVER 7 TIMES in 2 PLAYOFF GAMES? His only playoff "win" came as a result of the other team completely falling apart and Luck fumbling the ball to himself? Try to repeat that one. He stinks out loud and we are lucky to not have him. Moron Indy let Manning walk and he is still 10000 times the player Luck will ever be. They lost their coach and GM over him too and this was somehow a brilliant move because some dork on TV says it over and over and over? Don't always believe what people tell you, watch for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 No way, and we dont have a 1st next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 If we offered them all that for Luck on draft day---Of course! Other than for Sammy, this would have gone down as the most lopsided deal in history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manther Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 In hindsight. Basically, would you have trade those 4 players for Luck. That's basically the 1st and 2nd the year Luck came out and the next 3 1sts. I'm not saying I know that would get it done, but I feel like it's in the ballpark. Personally, I'd do it. EJ isn't a loss if we have Luck. Gilmore isn't the shutdown corner we thought he'd be. Glenn is still a question mark. I always find it interesting to look at trades involving picks after the picks have been made. To me, this is a no brainer. Just fun speculation I will play along. Glenn is good to very good. And if we traded the EJ pick we wouldn't have Kiko either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 That so many people can't figure out the OPs intent makes me question the intelligence level of this board. Pretty sad to see how far this place has fallen. Indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 (edited) That so many people can't figure out the OPs intent makes me question the intelligence level of this board. Pretty sad to see how far this place has fallen. BINGO! IQ around here is low. In hindsight. Basically, would you have trade those 4 players for Luck. That's basically the 1st and 2nd the year Luck came out and the next 3 1sts. I'm not saying I know that would get it done, but I feel like it's in the ballpark. Personally, I'd do it. EJ isn't a loss if we have Luck. Gilmore isn't the shutdown corner we thought he'd be. Glenn is still a question mark. I always find it interesting to look at trades involving picks after the picks have been made. To me, this is a no brainer. Just fun speculation I actually read and understand your point. I would have done it but Indy would not have back then. No way. What you offer would not have been close to working, not with Andrew Luck. By the way, I would add on several more top players to get Luck. Look at New England. Give me a great QB (absolutely elite), a great coach (elite) and fill the rest of the roster with whoever you found in the parking lot. That seems to work fine for NE. I advocate drafting every QB you can, every year, until you hit on one. We miss on a ton of draft picks as it is. Take more QBs! Until you have The Guy at that position, you won't have what you need. Edited October 23, 2014 by Stopthepain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Would this even work in Madden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 How would 61% NOT do this trade?!? It's well beyond my mental ability to understand this as well... That so many people can't figure out the OPs intent makes me question the intelligence level of this board. Pretty sad to see how far this place has fallen. Exactly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Maybe people are so emotionally attatched to Glenn that they can't comprehend the OP's premise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts