Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

To be clear.  I'm not saying guns should be illegal but removing it as a constitutional right would make it far easier to push for real gun control laws that actually have an impact.  It would be a privilege and not a right (like driving) to own a gun.  It would take decades, a high amount of activism, and a lot more mass shootings for it to even be considered.  You're not going to get all the guns off the street but gun buyback programs have been successful in other countries.

Im just a realist and can see the logistics of that, making the problem worse.  And creating more problems.

 

americans are not other counties citizens.  

 

300+ million in closets.  not registered. no records.

 

And right off the bat, who is disarming the gangs that commit most of the violence, that in turn pushes people to search out self-defense?

 

Eff, in reality every time gun bans or removing the second narrative even hits the cycle, gun sales go up.

 

The day the discussion goes to addressing the issue, from attacking Americans rights, I think progress could happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

ya think they'd do better with machine guns?  not with those idiots teaching them.  the guy showing his 12 yo son has him shooting from the hip! Maybe some birdshot or shot for skeet to start?   or a 16 OR 20 GAUGE? And you want these people to own AR's?  

 

And for @Chris farley, this from the NRA who recommend shotguns for home protection:  "Buckshot will penetrate multiple layers of drywall at any range. Smaller shot, like #4 birdshot, will penetrate at close range (under 10 feet) where the pattern is very tight, but less so at longer ranges. Think about how long your shots might be inside your home and what might lie behind your target in the most likely confrontation spots. If you live alone, overpenetration might not be a consideration, unless you live alone in an apartment building full of other people"

 They post some good info.  If they stuck to hunting and recreational shooting, I'd join.

https://www.nrawomen.com/content/what-shot-size-should-you-use/

 

I think they should have added "Avoid buying pink guns for protection".

I wasn't disagreeing with you. I would add the average joe with his 9, will blow right through a wall.  

 

Eddie eagle probably saved lives by teaching kids about gun safety.

 

 

 

 

4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Or maybe, just maybe, someone could write a Constitutional Amendment. Why does this have to be so complicated? 

With 3/4 of both houses?  State ratification?

 

what would the amendment say?  ban semi long guns?  end the second?  

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

I wasn't disagreeing with you. I would add the average joe with his 9, will blow right through a wall.  

 

Eddie eagle probably saved lives by teaching kids about gun safety.

 

 

 

 

With 3/4 of both houses?  State ratification?

 

what would the amendment say?  

 

 

It would say whatever opponents of the current wording want it to say. Geeez we’ve become increasingly lazy! 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

Why, so it gets a vote to see where people stand?

 

 

Why? Because if the Left wants to fundamentally change the country, maybe just maybe they should change via the means provided in the documents. That’s why. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Why? Because if the Left wants to fundamentally change the country, maybe just maybe they should change via the means provided in the documents. That’s why. 

I cannot argue with any of that, was just wondering the reason.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

I cannot argue with any of that, was just wondering the reason.

 

 

Like with all things. It’s not terribly complicated. I’m exhausted from the bickering. If people want to change the country….CHANGE IT! Or….go somewhere that’s more to your liking. There are plenty of countries to choose from. It’s a small world and pretty easy to get from place to place. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Like with all things. It’s not terribly complicated. I’m exhausted from the bickering. If people want to change the country….CHANGE IT! Or….go somewhere that’s more to your liking. There are plenty of countries to choose from. It’s a small world and pretty easy to get from place to place. 

What if you love where you live but think it could be so much better....

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

image.thumb.png.a7025a590ff02df2de877d73406b4862.png
 

*looks at data*
 

”Yep. Must be the libs / lack of guns / doors / trans people / lack of church / single parent families / gays / unarmed teachers. That makes sense to me.”

Are you under some odd false impression that people don’t already know that? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Are you under some odd false impression that people don’t already know that? 


Maybe read this thread of people blaming literally anything other than the prevalence of guns.
 

I think the current reason for gun violence according to PPP is trans people. It’ll change with the next mass shooting later this week. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChiGoose said:


Maybe read this thread of people blaming literally anything other than the prevalence of guns.
 

I think the current reason for gun violence according to PPP is trans people. It’ll change with the next mass shooting later this week. 


It’s guns, a broken system and mental illness. 
 

In many cases it’s depression in young males.  This instance it’s a trans person.  
 

Potential gender identity issues in other recent shootings as well.

 

Most shootings have laws on the books to prevent them already.  The law just wasn’t enforced. 
 

We should be able to have a conversation about all of it. 
 

Im certainly open to the gun discussion… hopefully the people arguing to take away rights from law abiding citizens will learn what they’re talking about when it comes to firearms, so that they don’t make idiotic arguments that put half the country on the defensive.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

To be clear.  I'm not saying guns should be illegal but removing it as a constitutional right would make it far easier to push for real gun control laws that actually have an impact.  It would be a privilege and not a right (like driving) to own a gun.  It would take decades, a high amount of activism, and a lot more mass shootings for it to even be considered.  You're not going to get all the guns off the street but gun buyback programs have been successful in other countries.

 

Please explain exactly what gun laws will keep the guns from the bad guys ? I'll wait .

 

Especially seeing as they have literally no respect for the law it self in any form or who makes them or enforces them ? Again i'll wait thank you .

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

image.thumb.png.a7025a590ff02df2de877d73406b4862.png
 

*looks at data*
 

”Yep. Must be the libs / lack of guns / doors / trans people / lack of church / single parent families / gays / unarmed teachers. That makes sense to me.”

So folks in those countries really really want to commit murder with guns , they’re just not “ allowed “ to by the super duper intelligent deep thinkers ? Mmmmmmkay! 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...