IDBillzFan Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 The difference?? Ya, 242 dead Marines again 4 dead in Benbygozi So to recap your position: Finding out Americans were left for dead by the WH and State Dept. is funny, and complaining about it is on par with questioning the president's birthplace. Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 The difference?? Ya, 242 dead Marines again 4 dead in Benbygozi Duh! That must have left you breathless with laughter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 hey, the bombing in Lebanon was preventable too, so what? Had Obama come out after the incident and explained what happened, who was responsible, what they tried to do to stop it and why their options to stop it were limited - this would be a completely different deal. Instead this is a big problem because: The requests for increased security were mostly ignored When the attack happened, we took no action and in fact made a decision not to act Sent a high ranking official out in public to spin the video story knowing it wasn't true. Obama himself offered the video excuse knowing it wasn't true Hillary used the video excuse in a direct conversation with one of the victim's family members Chose not to answer questions completely or honestly at a congressional hearing on the matter Put a gag order on others who were in the know Virtually nobody has been held accountable except of course for those who died You don't see this as very problematic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 Had Obama come out after the incident and explained what happened, who was responsible, what they tried to do to stop it and why their options to stop it were limited - this would be a completely different deal. Instead this is a big problem because: The requests for increased security were mostly ignored When the attack happened, we took no action and in fact made a decision not to act Sent a high ranking official out in public to spin the video story knowing it wasn't true. Obama himself offered the video excuse knowing it wasn't true Hillary used the video excuse in a direct conversation with one of the victim's family members Chose not to answer questions completely or honestly at a congressional hearing on the matter Put a gag order on others who were in the know Virtually nobody has been held accountable except of course for those who died You don't see this as very problematic? And add to it....that what exactly was going on at the CIA annex? Unfortunately I think its definitely plausible if not likely that we were supplying weapons to the "freedom fighters" terrorist scrum bags who graciously turned around and used them against us. Think the fast and furious scandal was bad? That is my gut on why the administration is stonewalling so badly. They desperately are trying to hide it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 (edited) You don't see this as very problematic? Obama got his second term and gator got a hearty laugh, so I'm going to say no...he doesn't see this as problematic at all, but more satisfying and delicious. Edited January 20, 2014 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Have at it guys. Judge Janine will make Hillary squeal like a pig. http://www.ijreview.com/2014/01/109688-judge-jeanine-completely-destroys-hillary-clinton/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Had Obama come out after the incident and explained what happened, who was responsible, what they tried to do to stop it and why their options to stop it were limited - this would be a completely different deal. Instead this is a big problem because: The requests for increased security were mostly ignored When the attack happened, we took no action and in fact made a decision not to act Sent a high ranking official out in public to spin the video story knowing it wasn't true. Obama himself offered the video excuse knowing it wasn't true Hillary used the video excuse in a direct conversation with one of the victim's family members Chose not to answer questions completely or honestly at a congressional hearing on the matter Put a gag order on others who were in the know Virtually nobody has been held accountable except of course for those who died You don't see this as very problematic? no, not problematic at all. Americans are smarter than you think. They know we live in a violent world and stuff like this happens. The he said she said, video, no video stuff is all besides the point. You guys want to try and make it like Obama murdered someone, or that this is the biggest f up ever, it isn't, not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 The he said she said, video, no video stuff is all besides the point. You guys want to try and make it like Obama murdered someone, or that this is the biggest f up ever, it isn't, not even close. Barack Obama and HIllary Clinton left four Americans for dead in Benghazi when they could have prevented it. Period. No other way to spin it. wouldn't expect a knob-gobbler Obamabot like yourself to understand that, but maybe.,,one day...you'll understand how the families of those four Americans must feel. But hey...no one is more upset than Barack Obama about this, and he will not rest until he finds out specifically what..ummm...what actually...ummm....hey, does Barry have time for a bucket of balls before the next tee time? FORE-WARD!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Barack Obama and HIllary Clinton left four Americans for dead in Benghazi when they could have prevented it. Period. No other way to spin it. wouldn't expect a knob-gobbler Obamabot like yourself to understand that, but maybe.,,one day...you'll understand how the families of those four Americans must feel. But hey...no one is more upset than Barack Obama about this, and he will not rest until he finds out specifically what..ummm...what actually...ummm....hey, does Barry have time for a bucket of balls before the next tee time? FORE-WARD!!! BS! You obviously have no understanding about the chain of command. Specific security concerns are left to subordinates down the command chain you doof. Yes, they probably lied about it right after, but oh well, show me a president that doesn't lie and I'll show you heaven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 BS! You obviously have no understanding about the chain of command. Specific security concerns are left to subordinates down the command chain you doof. Yes, they probably lied about it right after, but oh well, show me a president that doesn't lie and I'll show you heaven Neither does the majority of America. All they'll hear is "requests for additional security denied," "preventable deaths," and "no help was given." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Neither does the majority of America. All they'll hear is "requests for additional security denied," "preventable deaths," and "no help was given." Minor campaign issue, won't matter to anyone that isn't already voting Republican no matter what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Minor campaign issue, won't matter to anyone that isn't already voting Republican no matter what And there is your progressive left in a nutshell: the preventable deaths of four Americans -- left for dead in Benghazi by the WH and State Department -- are no big deal because everyone lies and it's not a major campaign issue. Way to represent, gator. You do progressives proud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 BS! You obviously have no understanding about the chain of command. Specific security concerns are left to subordinates down the command chain you doof. Yes, they probably lied about it right after, but oh well, show me a president that doesn't lie and I'll show you heaven So you support people that lie to millions to cover their own ass? Yes or no please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Minor campaign issue, won't matter to anyone that isn't already voting Republican no matter what It will matter...to her challengers on the Dem side, at the very least. So too will her Iraq war vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 BS! You obviously have no understanding about the chain of command. Specific security concerns are left to subordinates down the command chain you doof. Yes, they probably lied about it right after, but oh well, show me a president that doesn't lie and I'll show you heaven Are you really this !@#$ing retarded? Specific security concerns that ultimately involve the invasion of a sovereign nation don't devolve to local commanders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Have at it guys. Judge Janine will make Hillary squeal like a pig. http://www.ijreview....illary-clinton/ Why do I have the feeling that Judge Janine could make more than a few PPPers squeal like pigs, or whatever else suits her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 So you support people that lie to millions to cover their own ass? Yes or no please. Yes. You don't vote??? It's impossible to vote without supporting a liar. Or do you disagree??? Yes or no Are you really this !@#$ing retarded? Specific security concerns that ultimately involve the invasion of a sovereign nation don't devolve to local commanders. What are you talking about?? We were in the process of invading a country? Think before you write stupid. It will matter...to her challengers on the Dem side, at the very least. So too will her Iraq war vote. You think a challenger from the left will attack or this?? Come on. You have more of an argument over the Iraq vote, but even that probably won't matter, only if the circumstances at the time make foreign policy concerns at the time have something to do with making it an issue And there is your progressive left in a nutshell: the preventable deaths of four Americans -- left for dead in Benghazi by the WH and State Department -- are no big deal because everyone lies and it's not a major campaign issue. Way to represent, gator. You do progressives proud. Yes, preventable down the chain of command, not by the Prez or sec of state, no one can micro manage the world empire we have. Was Bush directly responsible for every attack on the American embassy in Bagdad? Indirectly yes, but not directly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 What are you talking about?? We were in the process of invading a country? Think before you write stupid. Yes, preventable down the chain of command, not by the Prez or sec of state, no one can micro manage the world empire we have. Was Bush directly responsible for every attack on the American embassy in Bagdad? Indirectly yes, but not directly Wow. You really are that !@#$ing retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Wow. You really are that !@#$ing retarded. I have to admit, I actually laughed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 What are you talking about?? We were in the process of invading a country? Think before you write stupid. Holy !@#$ing hell man. What the !@#$ is wrong with you?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts