B-Man Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Why is this still not an issue? This was an act of war andeven that kitty JFK would have done more then Obama has. Because, per the White House spokesperson, Jay Carney, Benghazi happened " a long time ago" REPORT: BENGHAZI ATTACKERS HAD INSIDE INFORMATION... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Worst.President.Ever That's saying a lot, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Worst.President.Ever That's saying a lot, really. but that's not saying anything. The american public agrees with bmans quote. Nixon, Johnson, BushSr. Etc were so long ago. Last week was so long ago. Who remembers last week? We have all these new shiny bull **** stories this week. Omg did you hear Kanye West flipped off a camera man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Because, per the White House spokesperson, Jay Carney, Benghazi happened " a long time ago" REPORT: BENGHAZI ATTACKERS HAD INSIDE INFORMATION... . Thanks this was the article I was speaking of. But remember...it was a shadowy character with an obscure YouTube video no one watched that led to spontaneous coordinated attacks. Most transparent administration in history! Yes we can! Hope and change! Forward! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 CIA personnel asked to sign additional non-disclosure form after Benghazi attack by Catherine Herridge At least five CIA personnel, including government contractors, were asked to sign a second non-disclosure agreement after the Benghazi terrorist attack, Fox News has learned. While the three-page NDA, obtained by Fox News, does not contain specific references to the 2012 attack which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, it does contain standard language that unauthorized disclosures could lead to "temporary loss of pay or termination" and "in some circumstances, constitute a criminal offense." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/11/16/cia-personnel-asked-to-sign-additional-non-disclosure-form-after-benghazi/ . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 http://www.foxnews.c...after-benghazi/ . Big deal. I had to sign a new one last month. They needed new ones on file for the contract mod. Means absolutely nothing on its own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Remember that Marines in Beirut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Remember that Marines in Beirut? May I mommy dog face to the banana patch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Remember that Marines in Beirut? Remember when Reagan said it was all because of a low-budget limited-distrubition movie, and Haig told Congress "What difference does it make?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Remember when Reagan said it was all because of a low-budget limited-distrubition movie, and Haig told Congress "What difference does it make?" Why we those Marines there again? Horrible President! A former defense secretary for Ronald Reagan says he implored the president to put Marines serving in Beirut in a safer position before terrorists attacked them in 1983, killing 241 servicemen. http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/01/30/aide-reagan-left-marines-vulnerable-in-beirut/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Why we those Marines there again? Horrible President! http://www.foxnews.c...able-in-beirut/ And...remember when Reagan said it was all because of a low-budget limited-distribution movie, and Haig told Congress "What difference does it make?" How DO you excuse the mealy-mouthed mendaciousness of the current administration? You're certainly not going to do it referencing Reagan and Beirut... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Benghazi is still top of PPP? My God... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Remember that Marines in Beirut? Oh yeah, wasn't that just as hilarious as a US Ambassador being killed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Benghazi is still top of PPP? My God... Nobody is more upset about four Americans being left for dead by the WH than the current WH occupant, and he won't rest until the people he let murder those Americans are caught! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 State Department reveals $10M reward for information on Benghazi attack In a letter sent to Congress Friday, the department says the rewards were not advertised on its website or posters or matchbooks as is usually done. The State Department says it has been quietly offering rewards since January of up to $10 million for information about the attack last year on U.S. diplomatic post in Libya. In a letter sent to Congress Friday, the department says the rewards were not advertised on its website or posters or matchbooks as is usually done. Read more: http://www.nydailyne...4#ixzz2l1PKEknv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Benghazi is still top of PPP? My God... Why is that surprising? People keep bringing up Iraq. People keep bringing up Monica Lewinsky. Hell, we've got a yahoo upset over Beirut now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Oh yeah, wasn't that just as hilarious as a US Ambassador being killed? Not funny at all! It was a thousand times worse, and then Reagan basically admitted it was wrong and turned tail and ran out of there. What were our troops put there for by Reagan to begin with? Told not to shoot?? Why is that surprising? People keep bringing up Iraq. People keep bringing up Monica Lewinsky. Hell, we've got a yahoo upset over Beirut now... Is there a friggin thread about about Lewinski and Reagan's f up in Beirut? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Benghazi is still top of PPP? My God... Thats what happens when information trickles out as those responsible for conducting an investigation actively impede it. Had the full story been told maybe around the time when it happened, we probably wouldn't be discussing it over a year later. Are there any other mysteries we can clear up for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Not funny at all! It was a thousand times worse, and then Reagan basically admitted it was wrong and turned tail and ran out of there. Kind-of like you wanted Bush to do with Iraq? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts