Jump to content

Refs are intentionally miscalling games


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

looks more like Polian pissed someone off and now the league does not want the Colts to be rewarded with Luck for tanking the season

 

 

Hard to lose when the refs are basically handing you the winning points

Maybe the refs hate Bill Polian and any team he's ever managed? Would explain alot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another badly called game(intentional?--ask Marv). Superbowl 26, Redskins vs. Bills. First half, four no-call pass interferences, two on James Lofton, and two on Andre Reed. In frustration, Andre takes his helmet off and slams it to the turf drawing a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty. Coach Levy is seen getting in the ref's face as the teams head to the tunnel at halftime saying repeatedly "You've been bought!" It's not hard to see when viewing the clip that Coach had a point.

 

youtube.com/watch?v=gFoOn78iL1s

 

On another related note, does anyone remember after Superbowl 25 vs. the Giants, Bill Parcells retired, and, months (or years) later was interviewed by Roy Firestone on ESPN when he stated "I had a plant in the replay booth". I remember thinking "what a (rat), he should be banned from having any association with the NFL forever!" I've tried to find a clip of that interview without success.

Don't know if we went for a field goal on that drive but Andre may have have cost us some points, although it wouldn't have mattered in that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most likely motivation for this would be money to the gambling interests, I can believe that. It should be investigated, it really wouldn't be that hard to do. Someone call the Justice department would they? :wallbash:

 

Actually the best way to handle this is the rule committee, it could easily make all calls and penalties by officials review-able. They do it on spotting the ball, no reason they shouldn't be able to do it on a penalty. :wallbash:

 

I used the wallbash there because sadly neither of those things will happen for a lot of reasons. But the second one should be out in discussion with journalists. They could help change and improve this issue (JW are you listening?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most likely motivation for this would be money to the gambling interests, I can believe that. It should be investigated, it really wouldn't be that hard to do. Someone call the Justice department would they? :wallbash:

 

Actually the best way to handle this is the rule committee, it could easily make all calls and penalties by officials review-able. They do it on spotting the ball, no reason they shouldn't be able to do it on a penalty. :wallbash:

 

I used the wallbash there because sadly neither of those things will happen for a lot of reasons. But the second one should be out in discussion with journalists. They could help change and improve this issue (JW are you listening?).

 

I think that second one is a great idea. :thumbsup:

 

Sports fans whine more than spoiled little girls. If my team lost it was obviously crooked.

 

Reminds me of the constant losers at racetracks who whine that the races are fixed but continue to bet.

Did you watch the Houston game or just assumed we're spoiled little girls?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most likely motivation for this would be money to the gambling interests, I can believe that. It should be investigated, it really wouldn't be that hard to do. Someone call the Justice department would they? :wallbash:

 

Actually the best way to handle this is the rule committee, it could easily make all calls and penalties by officials review-able. They do it on spotting the ball, no reason they shouldn't be able to do it on a penalty. :wallbash:

 

I used the wallbash there because sadly neither of those things will happen for a lot of reasons. But the second one should be out in discussion with journalists. They could help change and improve this issue (JW are you listening?).

 

Justice Department?? Now that's funny.

 

So you want every call to be reviewed? Even funnier.

 

 

If there was a story to report, wouldn't you think at least one reporter would have sniffed something out by now? People have been complaining about refs calls for generations. Where is the story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'hands to the face' call was on the offensive lineman at the start of the play (he damned near took his head off) not on the QB tackle. The sack play was because he hit the QB at or below the knees, which is a stupid penalty in general and shouldn't be a rule IMHO... but it is in the rulebook: http://www.nfl.com/r...tectionofpasser

 

It's one of the many rules changed/created for Tom Brady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Furthermore, if every call was reviewed the game would easily last over 5.5-6 hours. Reviewing every call is so impractical I can't believe someone would think its possible.

They could have penalty reviews like they do for challenging plays, Have 2 for the game and the last 2 minutes of each half. There would need to be a separate review committee instead of refs so there isn't any conflict of interest.

 

Each game is reviewed afterwords anyway so they could punish refs who make outrageous calls just like they do for players with helmet to helmet hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If there was a story to report, wouldn't you think at least one reporter would have sniffed something out by now? People have been complaining about refs calls for generations. Where is the story?

to be honest the story is what gets created IMO. Look at what was lined up this week, broncos losing makes Orton vs tebow a marquee game instead of broncos clinching and it meaning nothing. Colts winning now puts the luck sweepstakes in jeopardy again. Jets losing doesn't knock them out and leaves a bunch of teams chasing the wildcards in the afc as well as setting up a huge giants cowboys game.

I don't know where I fall on the nfl being fixed to be honest. That in itself is enough to wonder though as I should be able to easily dismiss such a thought. Things happen very conveniently a lot in the nfl may be coincidence may not be.

It may however fall to simple bias tho. The black guy that is a head ref seems to always screw the bills (can't think of his name not trying to be racist), and how many controversial games has steretore(sp?) been a part of in the last 2 years alone?

Pass interference calls and no calls and holdin penalties are a very easy way to sway the outcome of a game. As for who is pulling the strings god only knows. Media, the nfl, and bookies/casinos are just the short list of who benefit from the proper outcomes of games.

Again I'm not sure where I fall but I do wonder many times and not just with bills games whether or not "the fix is in"

Edited by section122
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Furthermore, if every call was reviewed the game would easily last over 5.5-6 hours. Reviewing every call is so impractical I can't believe someone would think its possible.

Maybe the reviews could be used for a brief interuption from our sponsors! that we have every five minutes anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks more like Polian pissed someone off and now the league does not want the Colts to be rewarded with Luck for tanking the season

 

 

Hard to lose when the refs are basically handing you the winning points

 

Jags colts could be one of the most interesting games of all time. Polian doing everything he can to tank the game. Players and Caldwell trying to win. Refs handing them the win as they should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Furthermore, if every call was reviewed the game would easily last over 5.5-6 hours. Reviewing every call is so impractical I can't believe someone would think its possible.

Phhtsh! I never said review ALL the calls, I said make them reviewable :doh: by that I meant the coach sees the replay (as in the bad block in the back call that Denver had on their return last Sunday, that cost Denver 7) the coach should be able to throw the red flag, same as now, on any other call. This is never going to happen because it would cause just too much of a loss of face by the league (to agree that the refs make mistakes). It would be better for the game but.....it is never going to happen, I agree it would have to be impartial to do this too.

 

And my point on the Justice dept. was if they were going to investigate this that is who would be doing it. It will not happen unless some investigative reporter releases a story that games are fixed and has some damn compelling proof (which I don't know if they are or not but if they were it would not be that hard to investigate in the first place, I would imagine it would be just follow the money). That is not going to happen IMO because as far as I can tell no one would bite the hand that feeds them, that hard. The reporter that did this would be blackballed by the league. Also the popularity of America's (new) game would take a hit if it was true.

Edited by bowery4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an easy way for these refs to make a quick 30 or 40 Grand. I'm not sure what the spread was, but the money line bet could have been something like Colts +300 to win outright. -Thats 300 bucks for every 100 you bet (plus your hundred back.) So you stand to make 400 on a 100 dollar bet. Now, turn that hundred-buck bet into ten grand. Keep in mind that you're the guy who interprets the game RULES. -You've been watching these, spoiled, overpaid, babies make millions playing a GAME, and watching greedy owners rake in BILLIONS in revenue. All you have to do is make a few terrible calls to manipulate the outcome in your favor? Who loses? Not the owners or the players. They already made their fortune. Yah, the fans are pissed, but so what? -they'll get over it. You fly back to Vegas & cash in a bet for forty large. Sure, you feel a little guilty at first, but when you and the missus are spending the offseason in St Croix, it'll all seem worth it.

 

Don't think it can happen?

 

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. NFL and NBA refs included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an easy way for these refs to make a quick 30 or 40 Grand. I'm not sure what the spread was, but the money line bet could have been something like Colts +300 to win outright. -Thats 300 bucks for every 100 you bet (plus your hundred back.) So you stand to make 400 on a 100 dollar bet. Now, turn that hundred-buck bet into ten grand. Keep in mind that you're the guy who interprets the game RULES. -You've been watching these, spoiled, overpaid, babies make millions playing a GAME, and watching greedy owners rake in BILLIONS in revenue. All you have to do is make a few terrible calls to manipulate the outcome in your favor? Who loses? Not the owners or the players. They already made their fortune. Yah, the fans are pissed, but so what? -they'll get over it. You fly back to Vegas & cash in a bet for forty large. Sure, you feel a little guilty at first, but when you and the missus are spending the offseason in St Croix, it'll all seem worth it.

 

Don't think it can happen?

 

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. NFL and NBA refs included.

 

In your dumbass world no one notices a ref living above their means? Not a single person in their life gets wind and blows the whistle? There are a limited number of NFL officials you don't think the NFL A MULTI BILLION DOLLAR OPERATION!! keeps an eye on the employees? One NBA ref convicted does not equal all are guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your dumbass world no one notices a ref living above their means? Not a single person in their life gets wind and blows the whistle? There are a limited number of NFL officials you don't think the NFL A MULTI BILLION DOLLAR OPERATION!! keeps an eye on the employees? One NBA ref convicted does not equal all are guilty.

 

LOL! What did I expect, on Christmas night. :lol:

 

I wish you less bitterness and misery in 2012, SD.

 

Sounds like you've had a really rough year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phhtsh! I never said review ALL the calls, I said make them reviewable :doh: by that I meant the coach sees the replay (as in the bad block in the back call that Denver had on their return last Sunday, that cost Denver 7) the coach should be able to throw the red flag, same as now, on any other call. This is never going to happen because it would cause just too much of a loss of face by the league (to agree that the refs make mistakes). It would be better for the game but.....it is never going to happen, I agree it would have to be impartial to do this too.

 

And my point on the Justice dept. was if they were going to investigate this that is who would be doing it. It will not happen unless some investigative reporter releases a story that games are fixed and has some damn compelling proof (which I don't know if they are or not but if they were it would not be that hard to investigate in the first place, I would imagine it would be just follow the money). That is not going to happen IMO because as far as I can tell no one would bite the hand that feeds them, that hard. The reporter that did this would be blackballed by the league. Also the popularity of America's (new) game would take a hit if it was true.

 

The NFL would lose face if the had to "agree that refs make mistakes"?? This is a crazy statement. Refs themselves have publically admitted blown calls ("mistakes") as has the NFL.

 

And do you really, truly believe that a reporter would hold back on a story implicating the NFL, the mafia, space aliens--whoever--in a massive game fixing scandal....because he would lose his press pass to the stadium?? Come on--there is no way you really believe this! He would rather continue to be some media outlet's beat reporter and have access to the press buffet table and the opportunity to ask completely inane questions in the locker room after wins/losses, instead of becoming the most famous investigative reporter of his time?? That is just nuts. The guy who broke the BALCO story is richer and more famous than he ever was before he and his colleague broke that piece.

 

"Just follow the money"? What, did you see that on TV?

 

Bottom line: fans of winning teams don't spend time wondering about who is paying off the refs to make Orton v. Tebow a "marquee" matchup or help/hurt the Colts pick/not pick Luck in net year's draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_New_England_Patriots

 

(I know...a patsies viewpoint, but I had a hard time finding information about this game).

 

Bledsoe, playing with a broken finger, engineered late 4th-quarter comebacks against the Miami Dolphins and Buffalo Bills to save the season. The Bills game was especially controversial, as the game was prolonged due to a series of questionable calls. With under a minute to go and down by four points, the Patriots engineered a long drive. However, the Buffalo defense appeared to stop the Patriots on 4th down with a juggled catch out of bounds. The referee needed to determine whether receiver Shawn Jefferson was inbounds, caught the ball, and achieved first down yardage. The referee on the sideline signaled first down after a conference with other officials. Several Bills claimed one said "just give it to them" (referring to first down yardage) in the huddle. Television instant replays showed that he was short of first down yardage, but the NFL had discontinued use of instant replay the previous season. This was followed by a questionable pass interference call made in the end zone on what would have been the game's final play. Bledsoe hit Ben Coates for a touchdown on the final untimed play of the game. In protest, the Bills left the field and let the Patriots kicker Adam Vinateri walk in for a meaningless two-point conversion. Doug Flutie, then the Bills' quarterback, later quipped "They gave them the game, we figured we might as well give them the extra point.”

 

I watched that game and remember the refs giving it to them. I remember Andre Reed saying after the game "I heard the ref say "just give it to them"". The most egregious referee

mistake I have ever seen. Anyone else remember the game?

 

That and SB XXVI vs the Redskins are a couple of the more compelling cases of officials throwing games for big market teams over small market teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a review of the final drive on SportCenter. The ESPN guys reviewing the plays (I forget who they were) were really angry about the terrible ref calls. It made some of the terrible calls that Bills fans have whined about look like no big deal in comparison. The refs definitely won that game for the Colts. They didn't even try to disguise it.

How about the blatant pass interference by Drayton Florence when the Denver game was still up for grabs that resulted on third down. Florence sux and he should have been flagged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the blatant pass interference by Drayton Florence when the Denver game was still up for grabs that resulted on third down. Florence sux and he should have been flagged.

Yep. I made mention of it in the Shout Box during the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the blatant pass interference by Drayton Florence when the Denver game was still up for grabs that resulted on third down. Florence sux and he should have been flagged.

Williams got away with one also. The Bills seemed to get the benefit of a few calls in that game.

 

I honestly don't think there is a conspiracy, I just think the calls are inconsistent, both from game to game as well as within a game. It's hard to call every penalty correctly, and there are several times when it's up to the ref's individual judgement or point of view. It's also hard for a ref to be 100% objective, I'm sure they have favorite teams and players. I know, I know... they are professional and that's what they get paid to do. But they are human, and humans make mistakes and humans have preferences. Just like the announcers are supposed to be objective, but after a while in most games you can tell which teams and which players the announcers are biased toward. It's all part of the game.

 

I also wonder how much the players banter influences the way the refs call a game. Does Brady get more calls to go his way because he is a big name player, and he is obviously worried about getting hit in the knees? He sure whines to the ref whenever somebody gets within five yards of him. I'm sure there are several players that the refs are more prone to protect, and several players that the refs are more prone to penalize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to be changing. What is your point again?

Okay, I guess you don't.

 

The point was that it's happened before, so to dismiss it outright it naivete at best. Most everyone agrees that the the officials' performance is unacceptable/substandard, for whatever reason. But doing nothing, as the NFL seems to be doing since things have only been getting worse, looks bad on them. Unless they like the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL would lose face if the had to "agree that refs make mistakes"?? This is a crazy statement. Refs themselves have publically admitted blown calls ("mistakes") as has the NFL.

And do you really, truly believe that a reporter would hold back on a story implicating the NFL, the mafia, space aliens----whoever--in a massive game fixing scandal

Come on--there is no way you really believe this! He would rather continue to be some media outlet's beat reporter and have access to the press buffet table and the opportunity to ask completely inane questions in the locker room after wins/losses, instead of becoming the most famous investigative reporter of his time?? That is just nuts. The guy who broke the BALCO story is richer and more famous than he ever was before he and his colleague broke that piece.

 

"Just follow the money"? What, did you see that on TV?

 

Bottom line: fans of winning teams don't spend time wondering about who is paying off the refs to make Orton v. Tebow a "marquee" matchup or help/hurt the Colts pick/not pick Luck in net year's draft.

 

Okay thanks for talking down to me like I am an idiot, I really enjoy being patronized on a fanboard and it makes me oh so effing happy to engage in a dialog with you.

 

So why haven't they done what I said and made the penalty calls reviewable, (by throwing the red flag, just so you don't misunderstand me) admitting a mistake after a game is over is a completely different thing.

 

If the reporter did report about the "massive game fixing scandal","the NFL, the mafia, or space aliens" would probably have him killed or ruin him one way or another. Who the eff knows why OJ was framed? (see at least I have a sense of humor)

 

BTW with out looking it up tell me the name of the "famous BALCO" reporter, you can't, or you would have used it in your post.

 

Bottom line: I never said I believed that game fixing was happening, I only said things about why we wouldn't find out if it was. And yeah I probably did see "follow the money on TV" what you are to smart to ever repeat something you heard on tv?

 

Last point, fans of winning teams don't follow the Buffalo Bills.

Happy effing boxing day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay thanks for talking down to me like I am an idiot, I really enjoy being patronized on a fanboard and it makes me oh so effing happy to engage in a dialog with you.

 

So why haven't they done what I said and made the penalty calls reviewable, (by throwing the red flag, just so you don't misunderstand me) admitting a mistake after a game is over is a completely different thing.

 

If the reporter did report about the "massive game fixing scandal","the NFL, the mafia, or space aliens" would probably have him killed or ruin him one way or another. Who the eff knows why OJ was framed? (see at least I have a sense of humor)

 

BTW with out looking it up tell me the name of the "famous BALCO" reporter, you can't, or you would have used it in your post.

 

Bottom line: I never said I believed that game fixing was happening, I only said things about why we wouldn't find out if it was. And yeah I probably did see "follow the money on TV" what you are to smart to ever repeat something you heard on tv?

 

Last point, fans of winning teams don't follow the Buffalo Bills.Happy effing boxing day.

WEO's been a ref apologist as long as I've known him. The only bad calls are the (rare) ones in the Bills' favor and the Giants getting away with holding on Manning's miracle throw to David Tyree in the Patriots SB upset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had thought it was a balancing for the longest time. The ref realizes he made a bad call so they give one away to make it fair.

Now i am thinking that if i see a Drayton pushing and tugging for five plays in a row on the sixth i am throwing the flag even if he doesnt touch the guy and thats the one we notice.

I do not have an eye for detail as some do. Now contrary to the point of this whole post, i must say that job of deciding interference on a game changing play is not something i envy at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that second one is a great idea. :thumbsup:

 

 

Did you watch the Houston game or just assumed we're spoiled little girls?

 

 

If you believe games are being fixed and continue to pay attention to the games, you are far more stupid than spoiled. Anyone who roots for something where the outcomes are not being determined by the participants is a moron of the highest order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easy:

 

-Become a bigger TV market

-Get an owner who is part of the league leadership rather than a laughingstock

-Get true superstar player(s)

This crap gets old. What team would you root for if there were no Ralph Wilson? I guess it's easy to pick on a 90 yr old man. Maybe one day your accomplishments will equal his.

 

Agreed. Fans still don't get it, Ralph isn't liked nor respected in this league by fellow owners. He again pulled his normal BS by getting with that assclown from the Bungles and wouldnt' sign the new CBA unless they agreed on no cap floor till 2013. I presume he thinks he will be Dead by then so he wouldn't ever have to meet it. I dunno, but I do know we need this clown gone as owner

And agreeing with crap like that gets old too....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_New_England_Patriots

 

(I know...a patsies viewpoint, but I had a hard time finding information about this game).

 

Bledsoe, playing with a broken finger, engineered late 4th-quarter comebacks against the Miami Dolphins and Buffalo Bills to save the season. The Bills game was especially controversial, as the game was prolonged due to a series of questionable calls. With under a minute to go and down by four points, the Patriots engineered a long drive. However, the Buffalo defense appeared to stop the Patriots on 4th down with a juggled catch out of bounds. The referee needed to determine whether receiver Shawn Jefferson was inbounds, caught the ball, and achieved first down yardage. The referee on the sideline signaled first down after a conference with other officials. Several Bills claimed one said "just give it to them" (referring to first down yardage) in the huddle. Television instant replays showed that he was short of first down yardage, but the NFL had discontinued use of instant replay the previous season. This was followed by a questionable pass interference call made in the end zone on what would have been the game's final play. Bledsoe hit Ben Coates for a touchdown on the final untimed play of the game. In protest, the Bills left the field and let the Patriots kicker Adam Vinateri walk in for a meaningless two-point conversion. Doug Flutie, then the Bills' quarterback, later quipped "They gave them the game, we figured we might as well give them the extra point.”

 

I watched that game and remember the refs giving it to them. I remember Andre Reed saying after the game "I heard the ref say "just give it to them"". The most egregious referee

mistake I have ever seen. Anyone else remember the game?

ugggh...the "Just Give It To Them" game was the first evidence that the Pats* are cheaters...before Belichick

The Jefferson catch was clearly short and out of bounds watching in real time...when a pair of nearby officials give it to him anyway, it's definitely a case where the officials weren't doing their jobs in an honest manner...that play was the reason Ralph voted in favor of instant replay in 99.

The Hail Mary pass interference call, called on Henry Jones by Terry MacAuley, now a referee, was ridiculous...Besides the fact that there's always tons of jostling around on a Hail Mary play, Jones probably interfered the least out of all the players going for the ball. Thomas Smith was the player who was most interfered with.

To this day, I don't trust the Pats* at all as long as Robert Kraft owns them and I get anxious anytime we have MacAuley or Walt Coleman (the referee for that game) as the referee for one of our games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This crap gets old. What team would you root for if there were no Ralph Wilson? I guess it's easy to pick on a 90 yr old man. Maybe one day your accomplishments will equal his.

 

And agreeing with crap like that gets old too....

Ralph was part of the "league leadership" during the formative years of the NFL. At 90, he's not going to be leading anything, except for a non-POS CBA (cough, 2006, cough) that benefits small markets. And it's because of the "new guard" ownership that the NFL has priced itself out of the reach of the average fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just follow the money"? What, did you see that on TV?

 

Bottom line: fans of winning teams don't spend time wondering about who is paying off the refs.

So Houston is not a winning team?

 

If you believe games are being fixed and continue to pay attention to the games, you are far more stupid than spoiled. Anyone who roots for something where the outcomes are not being determined by the participants is a moron of the highest order.

FOR THE LAST TIME IN ORDERED TO BE FIXED THE PLAYERS WOULD HAVE TO BE IN ON IT, WHICH I DON'T BELIEVE THEY ARE.

 

FIXING A GAME AND INFLUENCING A GAME ARE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ralph was part of the "league leadership" during the formative years of the NFL. At 90, he's not going to be leading anything, except for a non-POS CBA (cough, 2006, cough) that benefits small markets. And it's because of the "new guard" ownership that the NFL has priced itself out of the reach of the average fan.

Point taken. This Ralph Wilson bashing just gets really old, and stupid and the assupmtions are rediculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This crap gets old. What team would you root for if there were no Ralph Wilson? I guess it's easy to pick on a 90 yr old man. Maybe one day your accomplishments will equal his.

 

 

And agreeing with crap like that gets old too....

 

Thank you Sacto. It gets really old seeing nearly every thread turn into a Ralph bashing in some sort within the first 5 posts. We get it, you don't like Ralph, congratulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Sacto. It gets really old seeing nearly every thread turn into a Ralph bashing in some sort within the first 5 posts. We get it, you don't like Ralph, congratulations.

What is dumber? Thinking the game is fixed, or coming here to whine about the team and Ralph, waiting for him to die or the team to move, rather than moving on oneself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...