NoSaint Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Carolina should be interested in Kolb! No inside info on whether they're exploring that option. That'd work for both teams. Here is a sim of the Bills-SF trade scenario (this could also be for Gabbert, not just CB): Bills acquire DT in Free Agency. 1 7 Marcell Dareus DE34 Alabama 2 34 Kyle Rudolph TE Notre Dame 2 45 Andy Dalton QB TCU 3 68 Sam Acho OLB34 Texas 4 99 Owen Marecic ILB Stanford 4 107 Chris White ILB Mississippi State 4 121 Marcus Gilbert OT Florida 5 130 James Brewer OT Indiana 6 164 Shane Vereen RBF California 7 195 Jordan Cameron TE USC There will be good value in the late (RD5-RD7) rounds this year for TE, RB, and CB. 4-3 DT's will come off the board slower than 3-4 DT's. There will be early runs on DE and the better OT's. I was right on my predictions last year! i take it -- puts you in a great spot to choose between dareus and quinn, pick up a player and save cash. even if one is off the board i dont think both are at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Would you pull the trigger on the Bills-SF trade? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Carolina should be interested in Kolb! No inside info on whether they're exploring that option. That'd work for both teams. Here is a sim of the Bills-SF trade scenario (this could also be for Gabbert, not just CB): Bills acquire DT in Free Agency. 1 7 Marcell Dareus DE34 Alabama 2 34 Kyle Rudolph TE Notre Dame 2 45 Pat Devlin QB Delaware 3 68 Sam Acho OLB34 Texas 4 99 Owen Marecic ILB Stanford 4 107 Chris White ILB Mississippi State 4 121 Marcus Gilbert OT Florida 5 130 James Brewer OT Indiana 6 164 Shane Vereen RBF California 7 195 Jordan Cameron TE USC There will be good value in the late (RD5-RD7) rounds this year for TE, RB, and CB. 4-3 DT's will come off the board slower than 3-4 DT's. There will be early runs on DE and the better OT's. I was right on my predictions last year! Couple of things. I think Pat Devlin in the 2nd would be quite high for him. Why Jordan Cameron in the 7th when Rudolph is everything you could ever want in a TE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Long Beach Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Since I'm not a fan of a CB or WR at number 3 I'd be thrilled to make this move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungmack Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Better yet, if SF is that desperate, let them keep the #7 pick and instead trade Patrick Willis to the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair GM Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 DraftTek is going to use their Draft Lab to simulate a trade each week. One of the two scenarios involves the 49ers sending picks 7, 45, and 107 to Buffalo for pick 3. San Fran is targeting CB Peterson/Amukamara. Over forty percent of the votes in our discussion went to this scenario (the other one with just under 40% was Cardinals sending picks 5 & 69 to the Eagles for QB Kolb). Would you pull the trigger on the Bills-SF trade? In a heartbeat....and it would be a steal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Throw in Spikes and it's a done deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 DraftTek is going to use their Draft Lab to simulate a trade each week. One of the two scenarios involves the 49ers sending picks 7, 45, and 107 to Buffalo for pick 3. San Fran is targeting CB Peterson/Amukamara. Over forty percent of the votes in our discussion went to this scenario (the other one with just under 40% was Cardinals sending picks 5 & 69 to the Eagles for QB Kolb). Would you pull the trigger on the Bills-SF trade? Yes, then Quinn or Dareus Couple of things. I think Pat Devlin in the 2nd would be quite high for him. Why Jordan Cameron in the 7th when Rudolph is everything you could ever want in a TE? agreed, Don't understand why people think Devlin is a good QB, from what I saw the kid just doesn't have it. If some one wants to give me a honest answer I'd like to hear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Ugh, dont like Devlin or Dalton (or Kaepernick, etc), especially not in the second. Its a waste of the pick we got in the trade. Get the best Defensive players available. If we MUST go QB, it's either a guy we think it worthy of #3 or no one. Anyone else will take years to develop and only end up just as good as Fitz. Not worth it, and a waste of a pick, and a waste of our coaches' time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted February 10, 2011 Author Share Posted February 10, 2011 Couple of things. I think Pat Devlin in the 2nd would be quite high for him. Why Jordan Cameron in the 7th when Rudolph is everything you could ever want in a TE? My logic was that Devlin will be gone by the #68th pick. Cameron in the 7th is because our TE's combined amassed 168 yards and 1 TD last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB2004 Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 DraftTek is going to use their Draft Lab to simulate a trade each week. One of the two scenarios involves the 49ers sending picks 7, 45, and 107 to Buffalo for pick 3. San Fran is targeting CB Peterson/Amukamara. Over forty percent of the votes in our discussion went to this scenario (the other one with just under 40% was Cardinals sending picks 5 & 69 to the Eagles for QB Kolb). Would you pull the trigger on the Bills-SF trade? This would be a very good deal for Buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FightClub Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Carolina should be interested in Kolb! No inside info on whether they're exploring that option. That'd work for both teams. Here is a sim of the Bills-SF trade scenario (this could also be for Gabbert, not just CB): Bills acquire DT in Free Agency. 1 7 Marcell Dareus DE34 Alabama 2 34 Kyle Rudolph TE Notre Dame 2 45 Pat Devlin QB Delaware 3 68 Sam Acho OLB34 Texas 4 99 Owen Marecic ILB Stanford 4 107 Chris White ILB Mississippi State 4 121 Marcus Gilbert OT Florida 5 130 James Brewer OT Indiana 6 164 Shane Vereen RBF California 7 195 Jordan Cameron TE USC There will be good value in the late (RD5-RD7) rounds this year for TE, RB, and CB. 4-3 DT's will come off the board slower than 3-4 DT's. There will be early runs on DE and the better OT's. I was right on my predictions last year! Wow. That'd be just like the Bills. Make a great trade and then ruin it with those two selections in the 2nd round. Those are terrible. If we had 2 2nd rounders like that and picked Dareus in the first, they'd better be for ILB and DT. QB and TE? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDVA Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Move back four spaces for #45 & 107? Only if you would add their 3rd rounder from next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraps Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 (edited) Again, poorly run teams make the same errors over an over. We're going to draft another running back in the first round? Edited February 10, 2011 by Scraps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 I would take this deal before they could pull their hand back....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 (edited) I may be alone here but while this deal is awesome I would rather get their first round pick next season rather than a second this year. Having two first round picks next season (one if not both of those picks being pretty high) it would give them the ability to make a serious move for Luck ... It's a gamble yes, but worth it. A least to me ... Edited February 10, 2011 by tgreg99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 I may be alone here but while this deal is awesome I would rather get their first round pick next season rather than a second this year. Having two first round picks next season (one if not both of those picks being pretty high) it would give them the ability to make a serious move for Luck ... It's a gamble yes, but worth it. A least to me ... until there is a cba, no trades for next years picks.... just throwing it out there as a reminder going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Blizzard Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Would you pull the trigger on the Bills-SF trade? Yes, In a New York minute! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 until there is a cba, no trades for next years picks.... just throwing it out there as a reminder going forward. ah ... good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 DraftTek is going to use their Draft Lab to simulate a trade each week. One of the two scenarios involves the 49ers sending picks 7, 45, and 107 to Buffalo for pick 3. San Fran is targeting CB Peterson/Amukamara. Over forty percent of the votes in our discussion went to this scenario (the other one with just under 40% was Cardinals sending picks 5 & 69 to the Eagles for QB Kolb). Would you pull the trigger on the Bills-SF trade? Sign me up, Astro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts