Coach Tuesday

He wasnt wrong. If Whaley had taken Lynch and showed a commitment generally to finding a franchise QB, he’d probably still be here. You can justify a failed QB pick to your bosses. What was the point of the Lawson pick? How do you justify that pick when you still don’t have a QB? Hell, the linked thread mentions that the Cowboys tried to trade for the Bills’ pick so they could take Lynch but Whaley said no - so the Cowboys lucked out on Prescott instead (because they were focused on drafting a QB). Whaley could’ve traded the pick and taken Jack (as many of us here were begging him to do) or just taken Jack there... but staying put and taking Lawson was inexcusable given the position and the opportunity cost and lo and behold, that was the last draft Doug Whaley ran on his own and he is no longer an NFL GM. When you factor in the trade that was passed on - the Bills essentially took Lawson over an extra 2nd and 3rd and next year’s 1st or whatever it was - and the guy was injured and isn’t even a pass rusher when healthy. This isn’t hindsight, it’s foresight - look at the draft day thread, some of us were saying these things at the time!

Indeed he did - and there are some veteran posters in that thread who ought to be ashamed of themselves, comparing him to Freeney and Reggie Freakin’ White.

He is toast. Trade him for a 4th and be done with it. I wish we could dig up the draft day thread, when the pick happened I predicted it was the end of Doug Whaley, I got roasted...

Good stuff. Interesting that your observation about Peterman is exactly what did him in last year - he quickly gets the ball out to a specific spot on the field - regardless of what is going on in front of him. It leads to horrible - but quick - decisions. I can see why it teases the coaches into thinking he can lead a quick-release timing offense. The problem is he can't/won't actually read the defense during the play... this guy is trouble.

He’s horrible, on and off the field. His attitude reminds me of Maybin’s. They’d better hope for a Devonte Adams- type resurrection but this organization doesn’t exactly have a history of patient player development...

To be fair, Tyrod is still processing his benching...

That's the conclusion I draw from you talking about the "will of the people" and advocating for restrictions on speech for those who criticize the President.

There are 4-5 semi-deranged fascists on this board who have pretty much chased away all remaining objective, rational posters. They talk to themselves all day and take their own collective agreement as some kind of sign that their "side" is winning the cultural war. If you confront them with the lunacy of the current POTUS regime, their response is one of the following (i) snark; (ii) "But Obama/Hillary," or (iii) the media/intelligence community/any evidence contrary to their opinion is part of some deep state conspiracy of lies. They are lunatics engaged in a "Fox 'N' Friends" circle jerk on this forum. If you scroll up in the thread you'll see that they've started to attract the far-right (or far-left) anti-Semitic Lyndon Larouche crowd who think 9/11 was an inside job/manufactured by the Mossad. This is not a surprise. Most intelligent, rational posters stay away from this corner of the Wall - what I refer to as TSW's Taint.

That story makes no sense. That said - this guy may not be worth the trouble.

Why even engage with the ostriches?

The summer is for keeping it simple with fresh fruits and veggies in-season. One of my go-tos: cut fresh corn from the cob, saute it in olive oil and/or butter with garlic, fresh basil, salt and pepper. Squeeze in some lime juice and chill it in the fridge to serve as a salad. If you like, add chopped jalapeños or other peppers of your choice for some kick. Another one: use Hapless's caprese recipe but add in fresh sliced peaches (or grilled sliced peaches). And here is one of my all-time favorite recipes: super simple, cheap, somehow elegant: https://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1016815-pasta-with-fried-lemons-and-chile-flakes

The odds of Shady “sticking the landing” here would seem very slim...

I don't need to wait for the whole story to come out - I'd prefer to react based upon the "gut feelings" of some TWS posters.

Alpha, you’ve been pistol whipping the rest of us with your views on this all day...

You’re on record brah

I’m sure you came to that objectively, with no stake in the outcome...

Amazingly, this wouldn't even be close to the worst thing a current/former Bills running back has done...

Freakin' July, man... every year.

Not that it matters too much but I wouldn't be surprised if he uses a publicist to help maintain his IG account - not sure he's the one who does the posting.

I happen to be one of our resident attorneys! The reason I think it's bizarre - and I'd usually counsel against it - is because it can easily be spun by her lawyers as "attacking the victim." He does't need to sue her in order to defend himself against her claims if he believes they're frivolous - and he could always wait until her case is dismissed before counter-suing her. If I were defending her, I'd frame his counter-suit as an effort to bully and silence her. As for your question (2) - yes generally, but in this case there should be nearly total overlap between his defense to her allegations and his claim that she made it up. As a practical matter, the evidence in both cases should be identical. As for (3), you've hit on why it may actually be a great strategy for him - if her lawyers are pressing a civil claim against him, it's very likely on contingency - meaning they are footing the bill for a chance at the upside - and she is paying nothing out of her own pocket. By counter-suing, he may be changing the economic calculus on her side of things, because her contingent fee arrangement with her lawyers may very well not extend to defending his suit - meaning that she may have to pay out of her own pocket to defend herself, meaning that she may end up proposing a "walk away" settlement. I suspect this is the main reason he filed his suit (in addition, perhaps, to seeking an opportunity to re-brand himself in the media by going on the attack).

It's not a red herring at all, and you know that. African-Americans, in particular, do not have nearly the level of confidence in the justice system that other groups enjoy. A policy such as you're suggesting will deter them from coming forward to report crimes, especially crimes against them committed by whites, because they'll (perhaps rightly) believe that they'll end up with a long-term prison sentence for simply reporting the crime. The same would likely be true for poor people, who would be deterred from reporting crimes against wealthier individuals. Back to Conley - unless he has evidence that she made up the allegations, this is a bizarre and questionable strategy, to say the least.

If everyone had equal access to justice, maybe. You go ahead and continue to pretend that's reality - but it isn't.

You can be civilly liable for false imprisonment/malicious prosecution, and perjury is a crime.

Yes, that ought to fully deter people who lack faith in the justice system from coming forward to report crimes against them. Well done. There are some raging psychotics around here.

Nothing good will come of this (thread).