Jump to content

Bruffalo

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,865
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bruffalo

  1. You aren’t wrong about Diggs, but he’s still a known quantity over a rookie who has never played an NFL snap. Post June 1 makes sense. If we pull off a blockbuster trade for an Aiyuk or similar, we instantly have one of the best WR cores in the NFL. If we sign a Michael Thomas or similar, we’re definitely “good enough” in my eyes, but still behind where we should be.
  2. Anyone who believes the WR is in better shape now than it was last season is lying to themselves. That being said, a veteran Z WR add either by trade or signing feels needed. Even then it’s still sketchy unless it’s a big name.
  3. Damn Carson off the board. I thought he'd be a good late fit for the Bills.
  4. We will be lucky if 1-4 of these guys will be left by 204. Keeping my fingers crossed for Washington, Rice, Brade, or Carson.
  5. Solomon probably makes sense, but so did like 3 of the WRs on the board that probably won't last until the Bills next pick.
  6. Why? He's got all the traits and seems like a plug and play lock for McD's system.
  7. I think that's all accurate but not as much of a sure thing as Bishop.
  8. When everyone is a team captain, no one is a captain Beane. lol. It's crazy how important that is to them.
  9. 100% either you make a big swing post June 1 with a trade or you bring in someone low risk high reward like Michael Thomas.
  10. The Eagles are crushing this draft.
  11. This is a pick I really like. Excellent center depth and considering the Morse departure I think that’s sorely needed.
  12. What a useless comment that adds nothing other than you being mad about an opinion.
  13. He’s a good pick, but I’m not sure I love Beane’s draft strategy thus far. I would feel a lot more confident if we had doubled up on WR. Maybe they have a veteran trade or Michael Thomas in mind. This actual pick though is fine, he’ll be a good addition to the room.
  14. Totally, and I didn't mean to make it sound defeatist. Earlier in this thread I said that there are still good WR candidates on the board right now and we have a lot of capital to move around day 3 if we want to. I'm fine with the pick. I wanted a WR, but I get why they did what they did. Now if they don't get a WR in the 4th I might start to get very frustrated...
  15. I got blasted a while back for suggesting we needed two WRs so Shakir would have legitimate competition for his spot in the offense. Just assuming your guys will "take a step" is such poor team management. It's why we're in trouble in the WR room in the first place. There was too much misplaced faith in Davis.
  16. I mean... Okay. It's a need. There's still a few good WR prospects on the board that we can get in the 4th and we have a lot of draft capital to move around. It's whatever.
  17. That means the Chiefs will probably take him.
  18. I'd be fine with anyone in the top 10 besides the two LBs.
  19. No idea if this has been posted.
  20. Pitt has been historically pretty good at WR evaluation. I liked Roman, but not for the Bills.
×
×
  • Create New...