The Red King

Again, this was created in response to another thread, where the OP maintained it was a 50/50 split. That thread has, after four pages, had it's title and original post changed to cover that fact. It's linked above.

People love me at parties, tend to leave them laughing hard. Just, my sense of humor doesn't involve trolling. And can't rent me, my engine has a bad head gasket, wouldn't survive the commute. ?

I'm honestly stunned its not changed back yet. Mods are usually on top of things like this.

Oh, it was just to troll the members here, that's why the OP changed the title and original post after it got to four pages, trying to bury/hide it.

I linked the original thread in an earlier reply. The OP on that thread changed the title and wiped out their original post to try and destroy all evidence it existed. Original thread is here: Page two has the 50/50 claim.

It was in response to another poll, where the poster noted people were divided 50/50. That poster has since renamed that thread to Sam Darnold Dazzles in Debut

So, the OP changes the original post and title to hide what happened? ?

Wild Card, Buf @ Jax. Jax won 10-3. ...yep, it's over.

In CuddyDark's mind it's fact because the victim said so. See my prior post on white knight syndrome.

The playoff drought is over. The "drought of not making the playoffs without the assistance of other teams" or "the drought of not being a dominant team" remain. OP needs to quantify which drought.

If you claim the drought isn't over, how do you define droughf? Bills played a 17th game. Was called a playoff game, is on record as a playoff game. ...some people are never happy...

Exhibit "A", the NO game. Exhibit "B", the CAR game. And the best evidence of all, exhibit "C", the JAX game...a game we still had a chance to win because our D held them to 10 points. Yes, Tyrod was part of the reason, but he was in no way, shape or form "the quarterback that saved the season". Not even close.

Oh, should we toss some more facts out? Fact, McCoy wanted her out of the house, and jewelry returned. Fact, he was trying to evict her. Fact, there was an eviction court hearing slated for the day after the attack. Fact, the victim's story keeps changing, most recently with a newly added claim that the attacker outright said he knew McCoy, information that somehow did not come out right away. Fact...the facts do not make things as clear-cut as some believe.

I stopped reading at "...Tyrod, the quarterback that saved the season." Now if I can only stop laughing. ? The Bills looked terrible on paper last season, too. Coaching and defense saved the season. Spirit of the thread...Bills 7-9 wins, Browns 4-6.

"I care about the facts." What facts?!? The woman was attacked...fact. Every single other thing about this matter...heresay and conjecture. There aren't even facts...there is a single fact. One. See, I have not, and will not say McCoy didn't do it, any more then I'll say he did. Without facts, it's all speculation. Due to her recent antics, especially changing her story I find her far less credable, but I can't say for certain she's lying. And I've maintained that from the start. But stating McCoy either attacked her or hired someone to as outright fact? I love people who rant about people here already declaring him innocent, when they are already declaring him guilty. Hypocracy at it's finest.

White knight syndrome. Something horrible happens to a woman, and the women IDs the cause, some people will immediately believe them without a shred of evidence and lead the crusade to bring down the horrible ogre that did horrible things to the poor damsel. They never stop to question, even slightly, if the victim is wrong about their attacker (be it honest mistake, assumption or outright lie), or if all the facts might not be accurate. They see the victim, feel horrible for them, believe every word said without question, and berate anyone else who doesn't do the same as being insensitive to the victim. Seen it many times in my life. Hell, twice I was the white knight...and in the end it was revealed I was duped, both times. Lesson (eventually) learned.

Year one...9-7, end of a seventeen year playoff drought, best season in the entire 21st century. ...yeah, so far they got my trust. ?

C'mon. We can't bash Tyrod for refusing to throw to a reciever unless they're open by a mile...then get upset at Allen for throwing to a reciever that wasn't open by a mile...

I think we can all agree it comes down to what we think. But aa such, people are allowed to have their opinions and until actual facts surface no one opinion is any less valid then the other. Personally, her antics, and specifically her changing her story one time too many destroyed any credibility in my eyes. If there are people that want to believe McCoy had a hand in it, I'll not begrudge them that. They're entitled to their opinion just as I am mine. At the same time their opinion is just that, their opinion, and no more valid then mine.

I'm curious to see how well each QB responds to it. Ideally, take what they give you and torch them when the opening appears. Allen might have the hardest time adjusting, but at the same time his cannon gives him the best chance to make them pay when opportunity presents. I'm curious to see if he can be patient enough. As for Gerg, was one of the offers motivational speaker? "You'll have enough time to think about coaching in a van down by the river...when you're coaching in a van down by the river!"

So...you're being snippy with 26CornerBlitz for a perceived belief that McCoy will never get into trouble...when you, yourself went to the opposite absolute saying with certainty "...he is going to get jammed up again and again. It's really just a matter of time." ...we get it, you don't like McCoy, but holy hell...hypocrite much? Why doesn't everyone stop stating what they believe will happen as absolute fact? ?

If you want people to believe your story, you can't keep changing it. If the attacker indicated he knew McCoy, there is absolutely no way in hell that isn't mentioned out of the gate. Lawyer: "It's not looking good. Alright, you mentioned the security system, and asking for jewelry back that he wanted initially. Think...is there anything else, any little detail...anything else that might link it to McCoy?" D : "No! Um...lemmie think...is there anything I'm forg...oh! The attacker outright said he knew McCoy! Was that important?" ...this went from a faint whiff of bull **** to a flaming bag of poo on the porch.

So, lemmie see if I got this all straight. In just his first year as head coach, McD takes a team that looked terrible on paper, a team many said would be fighting for top draft pick, a team that almost everyone on the board here and experts alike claim seriously overachieved for their talent level...took that team, managed to get to 9-7, a playoff birth, and the Bills' most successful season in the entirety of the 21st century. ...and there are actually people here who think he's terrible and needs to be fired? ?

Well, McBeane's had one year...result on record, 9-7, playoff birth and a seven point loss on the road in the playoffs to a team that went to the AFC Championship game. Your...definition of "suck" must vary wildly from mine. ?

Here's a secret...McDermott didn't care about winning. At all. It was a preseason game. The only reasons he kicked the onside, was to evaluate his onside unit, and the off-chance he could get to see Allen try and run a game-winning 2-minute drill (personally would have loved to see how he would have handled that). But the actual W/L? McD couldn't care less.