Jump to content

Richard Noggin

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Richard Noggin

  1. It's also just a terrible take in the first place. Schobel was undersized and lacked power. Epenesa is big and powerful. And without reading the 20 or so pages I've missed, I'm hoping this has been pointed out repeatedly. I truly don't understand the comparison.
  2. Kind of upset I missed all the religious and political stuff the Mods apparently scrubbed from this thread. Love being at odds with my neighbors in WNY. Oh, well. I guess let's talk about punters, then. My money is on the dual threat guy, Vedvik (sp?). Also intrigued by the hybrid FB/HB guy. Love me a good west coast-style movement H-Back, if that's in fact what he is. Little help on this one?
  3. Love the first few comments following the linked article: WeaBootyWarrior8 months ago Led B1G in sacks as a non starter? What the *****? Why didn’t they start him? kingricky8 months ago @WeaBootyWarrior my thoughts exactly WeaBootyWarrior8 months ago @kingricky Like...That’s bad coaching, isn’t it? I don’t care who’s in front of him, if the dude is a baller, he’s starting ?
  4. It IS more complicated than that, you're right. But you're also right that allowing Brown and Beasley to work against CBs one step down on the depth chart will help them have more potential success. And, of course, you'd think defensive gameplans will additionally account for Diggs at times, with safeties rolled over the top of him and linebackers buzzing underneath him. Not sure the opposition had to do much of that player-specific scheming last season, which one hopes even further opens up the other options in the passing game, and even maybe more impactfully, spills over into how they defend our run game. We hope to see a cascading series of positive impacts, not the least of which should be Diggs's own game-changing production.
  5. You're kinda all-in on this Fromm pick, eh? I'll bet McBeane are much more geeked about the physical DE and RB who fell to them in rounds 2 and 3, to be honest. They will see the field in week one (barring injuries or viral complications). The QB pick represented excellent value; I'll give you that. And it's good to invest in the most important position in all of sports.
  6. It's actually officially true, albeit fractionally so. Moss 4.65 Singletary 4.66 But Moss more recently ran an electronically-timed 4.52 at a private workout, which might more accurately reflect his game speed on film. So Moss is in fact faster in a straight line.
  7. I sense a commercial break approaching...
  8. That's how the bleach drains out of it...
  9. You are relentless, aren't you? Points for consistency. Gotta ding you for being a real effing bummer, though.
  10. What a childishly limited perspective. Sounds painful.
  11. Have a shot of bleach. Cheers! Bills up soon...
  12. Again, your empathy is overwhelming. You'll be okay despite being reminded of reality. Enjoy the draft!
  13. Take it easy, you science geek. It's a thing. A real thing.
  14. Oh...that's not what I'm seeing on the TV already?
  15. Well, not...literally literally.
  16. May I ask what EDGE players have to do with Milano's contract?
  17. I guess technically you could don a mask and watch from afar. Just sayin. Big gloves.
  18. Also, sarcasm should be funny. And not so drawn out. And actually sarcasm.
  19. They forgot the asterisks?
  20. Sure, I don't think Beane would mind this at all either if a 1st round LB and a 1st round RB can be had in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, respectively! But it seems unlikely, innit? I've had similar hauls in mocks lately, and while fun to play around with, we have to recognize that these players will almost 100% be gone LONG before 54 and 86. Heck, they might both go in the top 20 based on production plus testing (Taylor seems less likely).
  21. Certainly sounds like McDermott's defensive philosophy, even though you'd take a very different route with respect to personnel and alignment. Reads right to me. Thanks for taking the time. Might not be relevant, but (in keeping it Bills related) I'm oddly reminded of Jauron's defenses here, and how--while mostly mediocre--they actually gave vintage Manning and the Colts trouble on the road, playing that measured, conservative coverage-based scheme. The vaunted Cover-2/Tampa-2: keep everything in front of you. Rangy middle linebacker and dynamic safeties, zone-heavy CBs with eyes in the backfield, four down-linemen...I mean, not when the Bills ran it. But ideally.
×
×
  • Create New...