teef

stays healthy and no increase in production?

nice. woods has to be out for watkins to be able to get any production. that's the sign of a elite wr. also, before you were saying if watkins just stays healthy, he'll get 12 mill. now you've at least added an amendment that there has to be some production involved too. good for you. no. i'm not going to watch the la game. if i can watch bc play on saturdays and a the bills on sunday, i'm lucky. sammy's production shouldn't be dependent whether or not i watch. or do you want me to watch to see how a hall of fame decoy plays?

Why would watching a Rams game change my opinion? Sammy wasn't elite here, and he's not elite in LA. High end receivers put up production. Sammy hasn't. I don't know why this is hard to understand. You've thrown out more absurd excuses than I think you realize. Again, I think Sammy is a good wr, but you value him far more than he's ever shown to be worth. LA will have to make a business decision. If they give him 12 mill a year, they'really fools.

his arguments so far are this: you haven't seen the games...goff is being coached not to throw to sammy...sammy is elite because he had slightly over 1000 yrds in this offense. really? julio jones has more than proven himself as an elite wr. you're trying far too hard here.

good for you for giving it a shot. he's never going to admit that sammy hasn't been worth the price of admission so far. i think the rams really wasted a 2nd on the guy.

just because you say sammy is elite doesn't make him so. the man hasn't shown to be elite in any year he's played. i like him too as a wr, but he's been nothing but underwhelming.

no one wants to work here because we always get lunch from applebees and the women just aren't hot enough.

i'll put my body out there if i think it helps this team get a new qb. i'm in it to win it.

wrongly criticized for poor play? no. wrongly accused of having a lousy future in the nfl. yes. wrs take time, and zay had some serious jitters. it was wrong to make absolute assumptions for the future of this team based on what's happening this year.

this may just give me that boost to put me over that op. thank you for that.

again, all you have to fall back on is whether or not i watched the games. first off, how much free time do you have that you watch all of the la games? second, if i watch, all i'm going to see is watkins not getting the ball. if he's not in an ideal situation, fine, but it sure seems like all elite wrs manage to get open and make big plays...while being double teamed. i like watkins as a wr, but he's not elite, he's not a top 10 wr, and he's not getting 12 mill next year. keep trying to convince yourself any way you want. i think someone who's reasonable and reading through this thread know you're trying far too hard.

you're not going to bring my up on harassment charges 10 years from now, are you?

yet we've seen fans attack him, already labeling him as a bust. patience is hard with this team, but i assume zay will be more than ok.

says the guy who thinks watkins is a top 10 wr who will get 12 mill next year, (if he stays healthy).

i fell like i should be hugging someone.

oh jesus christ. the "you haven't watch the film" cop out. it doesn't matter. sammy is not productive. in this thread alone you were trying to convince us that goff is being coached not to throw in sammy's direction. you also tried to convince us in another thread that goff isn't nearly as good as tyrod, so you can defend sammy again. this is getting ridiculous, and you don't even realize how absurd you sound. you're doing nothing but making excuses for a wr that hasn't done much at the nfl level yet.

i can get behind this. not calling it a rebuilding year, along with having some early success has really put a knot in the panties of many a poster.

i think sammy has the ability, but he's in no way a top 10 receiver now. he just isn't. is your measuring stick for success 1000 yards? especially from a receiver who you think is "elite"? no matter how you reason it out, sammy has completely underwhelmed, and has been a disappointment. hell, the rams may have just wasted a second round pick on him. i don't know why you insist in putting the guy on a pedestal. he just isn't that productive. you also seem to think the rams will pay him strictly on potential. they'd be nuts to do that. i think watkins can be very successful in the right situation, but so far no one has seen it. you can't seem to separate emotion vs reality when it comes to sammy. it's strange.

this really is the way to go. i'm telling you...buy a ticket or two in the clubs. fewer games, but it such a nice way to watch football.

your'e not done row. you know that.

people who thought peterman would light up la has zero to do with watkins being wildly overpaid at 12 mill a year. if he gets it, good for him though.

he legitimately thinks this. 72...do you really think, even if staying healthy, that watkins gets 12 mill for his production?

you literally might be the most absurd poster on this board. you've convinced yourself watkins is some sort of superman, and will reason it out in any way, (no matter how absurd) to keep that a truth in your head.

oh stop it. you just assume how that works out, and who know. keep trying to make things up so watkins can seem more important that he really is to la. you need to realize it wasn't about this year...at all.

with my knees. you don't want to know what my elbows were doing.