I think it's just more of a case where you don understand what they're trying to do here. I'm not saying it's going to work, but they have a plan. You really don't think trading Sammy had nothing to do with his personality and production, and it's only about money?
do you think losing guys like gilmore and goodwin was strictly about the money. do you think the bills should have paid out for gilmore? the pats did and they don't seem to pumped about it. what did goodwin ever do in buffalo? woods is solid, but his contract was pretty large. on top of that, if the bill were trying to shed contracts and save money, why give eric wood a contract bump?