teef

It was when I posted the nudes of myself...wasn't it?

how long has tyrod been in the league? to compare peterman and tyrod is a bit off to me. tyrod is definitely the better qb, (at this point, at least to me) but some are trying far too hard here.

if the bills win 9 games with this roster, i see it as a success. not that it helps the bills in any way, but it could be a great indication that we have extremely solid coaching. i still won't know what to think about this staff until after draft.

i think it's harder than you're giving it credit for. not that the bills haven't made being bad seem easy.

probably because it happens every time the bills play the pats.

i love it that scott thinks he's smarter than the pegulas. will you at least admit that it was a complete waste of time, and annoying to everyone here that you constantly, (and i mean constantly) complained about the loss of mike gillislee?

football!

i'm not defending peterman at all. he was bad in his debut. i know that. none of that excuses taylor from his poor play. you consistently look for excuses as to why "your guys" aren't doing well. the reality is that if the entrenched starter, (taylor) had been playing at even an average level, peterman would not have been put in. this is coming from someone who likes taylor too.

as soon as i read the thread title, i just know this would be a sea of overreaction.

nitpicking one play to make a point. seems appropriate. as others have mentioned, if taylor hadn't been stanking up the joint, it would never have come to this.

this...this is what this world needs more of.

bills and boston college the most by far. i think the leafs and sens are a distant second.

i'm falling asleep reading this.

if i do enough drugs, i'll be up for anything.

this wins the thread. shakespeare for everybody!

this is the main point. i like taylor as a qb, but he's certainly not a guy you build a team around.

not in the least.

i was from one of those situations as well. both sets of my grandparents were from italy, and there was the thought that you couldn't move forward in life without a formal eductions, (which we all know isn't true). i think it was more fear as i can't tell you the number of times i heard, "they can never take your education from you!"

what did you want to do? or was it one of those situations where you weren't sure, and people told you you might as well go to college?

i haven't done it, but my best friend did. he was in pharmaceutical sales for johnson and johnson, and absolutely hated it. he was always under the gun for sales, and they dangled his job over his head constantly. he knew they were cutting staff, so he actually put himself in position to be let go. at first i thought this was nuts, but he had a plan. he ended up to going back to RIT for packaging engineering. since he had been laid off, he was able to get money, (i really don't know if it was a grant or what) to cover a very large portion of his tuition. i think it was a program where the unemployed could learn a new vocation. years later he now lives in buffalo, works for rich foods, and makes a very good living. that being said, he did this in his early to mid 30s. he didn't have kids yet, and his wife had a good job in sales. i'm sure this scenario helped him make the decision.

notice how you get into it with almost every poster? yeah...i'm sure it's all their fault. you really need to start taking the emotion out of posting, stop making up facts to support your opinions, and learn how to have a normal discussion. my god...someone proves you wrong so you put them on ignore?

if rich dawson was still alive, there would be a line of women waiting to call that guy out. then again, not a single one seemed to mind when he leaned in for that oddly sexual kiss strangers don't typically exchange...especially when the rest of the family is still there.

exactly. at some point you just play the games, and let things fall where they may. it's still way too early to worry about the draft. so much will change between now and then.