Jump to content

LeGOATski

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LeGOATski

  1. Stay at 28 or make a modest trade up to get your guy. Those are the two realistic options. They'll be fine.
  2. Wherever the real killer is, I'm 100% sure he or she is dead.
  3. You tell me. This is a hypothetical scenario the OP posed.
  4. If they did, it would mean they're super confident in Bernard and Williams.
  5. Sucks that it's the home opener, but I leave it's like Spring time in Brazil, whereas if you did it later in the year it would be the middle of Summer...
  6. World Cup is better than March Madness Big Brother houseguests
  7. Get your WR1 from somewhere in the first 3 rounds. Got it.
  8. Diggs without question. Best quality, most exciting Bills football I've seen played between him and Josh. Plus, he's entertaining.
  9. You're not wrong, but you can reference the whole thread about WR roles currently on the front page. Some people in there explain I better than me. Samuel's on the shorter side, but not skinny/small. He has good hands can run any route Davis did. Davis is not a super-athletic, jump ball-catching boundary WR, anyway. Samuel can get the production Davis did, while hopefully the star rookie takes over the WR1 role by year two, if not year 1. I'm hoping the replacement for Diggs has that contested catch ability and super speed in his arsenal.
  10. Samuel is a 700-800 yard receiver in Brady's offense and still has the speed to go deep. He's definitely a Davis replacement in my book. Now we just get an all-around star to replace Diggs. I'd prefer a bigger guy with good hands. I bet the Bills will land one of Odunze, Thomas, or Legette.
  11. OP should've made a poll, so we could see the demoralizing visual of 100% no's.
  12. Love March Madness, but no. I like the NBA finals more than March Madness.
  13. No, it was either keep Diggs and add a guy like Samuel, or upgrade from Diggs and add a guy like Samuel.
  14. Don't think they need two in this draft. They need to land one "alpha," as you put it. They already have 4 other starters catching the other passes (Kincaid, Jimbo, Samuel, Shakir....and also Knox...). If they draft another receiver late and he turns out good, that would be icing on the cake, but not a need.
  15. All I know is that the Bills need a "traditional" if they want to add some variety to this WR corps. Dalton Kincaid is supposed to be our "move" tight end, also....
  16. Same. I feel like the girlfriend drama affected Josh more, anyway.
  17. Moderate trade up for Thomas is where I'm at. Or Odunze if he falls a bit. Fine if they stay put and take Legette too
  18. That's the game plan that usually works against any top rusher, so I don't think that's exactly a knock on Parsons' game.
  19. I think he's just distracted by all the offers he's getting. Has to turn them down left and right.
  20. He's SO anti spring football that he watches this thread hourly Yeah, that's a good description of what I said
  21. I vote no. They don't need to trade up so far, but if they love a guy I won't complain. WR is a super valuable position. My point of view, there are 3 guys with similar skill sets that represent 3 different tiers of trade value: Odunze: big trade up Thomas: small trade up Legette: no trade up I'd love any of it And then...Coleman: small trade back...
  22. Yeah, I don't understand why they changed from the original cowboy head to the current "AR" stylized logo. For my taste, the Defenders have the best unis. Traditional style and subtly creative.
×
×
  • Create New...