Jump to content

LeGOATski

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LeGOATski

  1. Legette, Mitchell, Coleman, MHJ This receiving corps needs a more typical boundary receiver and someone who doesn't necessarily need the separation to make a big catch. Josh has never had top-calibre WR with that ability. Closest was Benjamin for a year? All he's ever had are some backup-calibre guys with plus size traits. As good as Diggs has been, he's obviously not a big guy.
  2. He'd be redundant in this WR room. The Bills already have Diggs, Samuel, and Shakir. Get somebody that'll add an extra dimension to this receiving corps.
  3. Low key advertisement for Ford. Coming from Michigan, he probably has a deal with them.
  4. It'll look like what the XFL has been doing. https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-kickoff-rule-proposal-explained-xfl-hybrid/39289cbbbc8478c42e177af9
  5. All due respect, you don't know what's best for WNY. Buffalo is, like you said, not a big city. On top of that, it's population has been in decline. So in this case, LESS IS MORE. In all your business wisdom, you'd spend an extra billion dollars to build a bigger stadium in a better area when the economics don't support it.
  6. What if Zach Wilson is actually a huge D-bag? 🤔
  7. If this is about the next 5-6 years of this team, then there's no better time to nab Larry Fitzgerald/AJ Green
  8. Absolutely, #1 WRs are extremely valuable in this league. If there's one they are confident in, pull the trigger on that trade. People who have PTSD from the Sammy Watkins trade forget that this is a much better environment for a new WR to come into, and this staff seems much better at identifying guys with the right mindset.
  9. No doubt. They don't give two *****. And Cleveland already knows what that is like, unfortunately.
  10. Yeah, I would probably take a break from this place for a while.... Based on the "at least twice that" quote, a dome stadium there would approach $3 billion when all said and done. But just purchasing that land alone...and now the cat is out of the bag, the current occupants aren't going to be selling low...seems like a huge waste. At least the Bills already had most of the land.
  11. Well, that answers that... Taking a look at Brook Park, gotta wonder where that 176 acres is and who is getting displaced....
  12. Who cares. The Bills seem to already have a big international fan base for some reason.
  13. By the examples in the video, there's a clear intent by tacklers to curl their lower body into the back of the runner's legs. It's a way to get all your weight on them and also trip them up. I do think they're just doing whatever they can to bring the guy down, but it's also more dangerous and something that can be cleaned up easily. Typically you just grab the runner and go limp, your legs stay behind you. You either drag them down by the waist or you slide down and wrap up their legs. Maybe people are confusing wrapping up the legs with a hip drop tackle. These things are not the same. So tacklers from behind can still wrap up a runner and it won't be called.... Ideally (We all know refs will screw this up.)
  14. He has physical tools, but not the mental tools, IMO. And I think there are issues that run a little deeper than just mental processing. He is not a leader.
  15. I don't think Wilson would've ever been good on any team. He should focus on what's next outside the NFL. Just my 2 cents.
  16. And you'll be furious that I'M furious!
  17. So, they WILL call them in game. Thanks.
  18. Like every other rule, it will be called in game. What other rule never gets called in game?
  19. I guess they'll just keep doing it like they have for the past 100 years....
  20. We all know that title was a joke. And Tua's the best QB in the off-season.
  21. It's not the rules that suck. It's the system. A system built to be a haven for the grey and the vague. A system willingly vulnerable to manipulation and corruption.
  22. How ridiculous. We've created a new rule that we assure you is completely justified, but we're not going to be able to enforce it in the game....because reasons. That is absurd. Can anyone think of another example where a league implemented a new rule, but didn't enforce it right away? What a broken system. Since they're announcing it now, they should've already done their homework and be able to implement it straight away. That's how a legitimate league would handle their business.
  23. That means you might not like football as much as the next. Literally.
  24. Most of these unis look pretty bad. I really wish Houston kept the Gamblers over the Roughnecks. They looked 200% better and had a less cheesy name. If they had, I would be rooting for them simply because they're cool and were Jim Kelly's team. Otherwise, I have no ties to these teams. Currently I'm partial to the DC Defenders.
×
×
  • Create New...