LeGOATski

That means you might not like football as much as the next. Literally.

Most of these unis look pretty bad. I really wish Houston kept the Gamblers over the Roughnecks. They looked 200% better and had a less cheesy name. If they had, I would be rooting for them simply because they're cool and were Jim Kelly's team. Otherwise, I have no ties to these teams. Currently I'm partial to the DC Defenders.

Oh....my ...god. Nooooooooo!!!

To start, maybe... they're still going to call it in game.

For sure. It's going to be a grey area that causes more variability in the officiating. This is where the USFL/XFL officiating system comes in handy. They have a ref in the booth at the stadium reviewing plays in real time with a better viewpoint and without the other distractions that the refs on the field have. This is the type of call the booth ref can get correct more often than the field ref can. If the NFL simply implemented a better system, which they've neglected for a decade now, this wouldn't be so painful. He was a victim of it by Joey Bossa I think, but fortunately didn't get injured (idk how because the replay looked ugly.) That was an infamous play that season where we heard on the replay Bosa saying "how else am I supposed to bring him down? He's too big." I think it was Bosa. Or maybe Watt. The Bills Oline took exception to it and was yelling at him.

I think so. I've tackled people from behind without needing to curl up my body the way the defenders in that video do.

Take a look at how the defenders use their lower body. Once they have grip, they swing their legs out in front in order to land on the back of the runner's legs. The answer, I think is to keep your legs behind you; don't swivel your hips/swing your legs. Sometimes the way the runner moves might still cause the defender's body to swing around, which is where this could get confusing. But there's a clear technique here that just needs to be adjusted. It'd be nice to see a video comparison showing the right technique vs the wrong technique.

You don't swivel your hips and drop your legs down onto the back of the runner's legs.

Look at this in context of drafting a 23 year old (you're original complaint) who turns into a #1 WR. In comparison to Diggs, this means you have him at least 9 years, producing 100+ receptions and double digit TDs. That also takes Josh to 37 years old, the probable end of his career. You're making up a problem where there isn't one. Look at Diggs production from the moment he was signed and tell me where the problem is? I mean, he's only been Josh's best receiver and one of the best in the league.... woe is we....

Your hypothetical scenario is not an issue at all. The Bills had no problem paying Diggs at 29 years old.

So, you're saying he could play for the Bills for 10 years. Oh no.

Yet, Legette is the type monster athlete Josh has never had at receiver. Josh already has good, quick route runners. The one type of guy he doesn't have is the jump ball winner. The icing on the cake is that Legette has legit top end speed.

I don't agree on all points, but it is true that the Bills have NOT taken a step back. I expect them to be contenders once again. Hopefully they land an offensive difference maker in the draft and hit the ground running this season.

I'm not talking about just a tall receiver. That's a very basic way of looking at my post. You see I mentioned Garret Wilson, who isn't even that big. I'm talking about a talented WR who actually has that skill set.

I agree. And Josh has never had a monster WR. Give him a guy he can just throw high balls to. We always see guys like Garrett Wilson, Courtland Sutton and the like make big contested catches against the Bills. I'd like the Bills to be able to do that. Paired with Diggs, Samuel, Kincaid, Shakir, that's a versatile receiver group.

Make it happen. Fill the rest of the roster with cheap FAs and guys off the street. I don't care.

Ed Wang They kind of existed simultaneously. The mysterious answer to this burning question needs to be someone who only barely crosses over with Kyle. 1-2 years max.

I don't think the Bills are going for an old, washed-up center who wants to retire...

I think they know he'll be one of the top WRs still available in the 2nd round. Need to do their due diligence.

He's just a guy. If teams were knocking down his door, he surely would've gotten more. I bet part of his goal was to be in a good offense too, so it's possible he turned down more money.

Meh. Brown seems to be getting over hyped. He's just a guy. But it's a good deal for both sides.

On the contrary, they'd probably be undefeated in one score games and be okay without Allen. Prove me wrong.

Eh.....without Josh Allen and an even worse roster they went 9-7.

Huh? Going by the cap projections, the Bills are gonna be in pretty good shape and still have a great roster. What's your specific complaint?

It's gonna be the steal of the century once he becomes the next Tom Brady. Pats got fleeced.