HamSandwhich

That's what I hear

I wonder how analytics access with the hike in the salary cap. This means more teams have more money to spend. IMO, that makes it more likely other teams will overspend. Perhaps, 12 mil for a top safety is going to become the norm rather than the exception. We'll be left in the dust because we didn't factor that in or undervalued the threat. We'll see I guess

In a perfect world yes, but a 1st round pick with that much talent will not be riding the pine because he's not happy he's not playing LT.

but if put on a hamdsandwhich, that perfume smelling manure transforms into

Seconded, but make it 20 mins or less

I knew someone would try and refute me by implying I'm a, regular, garden variety, over valuing, Bills homer,but based on the body of work, most of these players are undervalued. Mario Williams is much more than last season. ERIC WOOD is not a yellow player, he's a beast, and he's shown that consistently over his career when healthy. No where in the article does it say how these charts were rated. Sorry if I missed it. Are they trying to base it on how they played just last year, are they doing it based on the career, their age, and their projected abilities, are they basing it on statistics alone? What is the basis of these ratings? These charts are garbage unless they reveal their process. I stand by my origional statement. They way undervalue too many of our players.

Would ya now?

This is what I was wondering myself. Who gets moved?

It's only March 1st though...

Thanks for the info guys

That was a horrible article. Kyle Williams, IMO, is an elite DT, and should at least be higher than Marcel. Mario IS an elite player, Eric wood is just an adequate starter? This thing is a joke!! It's like they saw it was the Bills and decided, 'we can't give them a very high grade because as a whole they aren't that good'. As a team we may not be playing very well, but we have individual monsters on the team for sure. Any knowledgeable football fan could see this that, even ones that root for other teams.

Are you sure the franchise tag doesn't get 20% boost too?

engine that is run on donkey doo doo that smells eerily like

I talked about the limitations of the design. Look back

This is exactly what I was going to say. Nice work none the less. There is a very strong correlation for sure, but there is wiggle room for confounds. What exactly is the driving force behind these "successful" qbs and "unsuccessful" qbs? Is it their own ability, or is it their system? There are very few that can stand on their own and say that it's their TALENT and not the system. So can this really be about how good the QB is or could it possibly be because of outside influences, in this case, the system. Maybe its the QB coach they have, maybe a combination of all. What if EJ fizzles out here, is it becuase he doesn't have the talent, or was he not put into the right situation? This is a strong correlation, but I wouldn't stand behind it wholeheartedly, there's too many questions and possible confounds. It would be very tough to control for these conditions. It would likely have to be a case study, ie, Peyton Manning. He left the Colts, is in a very different system in Denver, and still wins. There's a very strong argument that he stands on his talent. Anyway, very well thought out study. Good work!

Someones taking intro to statistics. Hated that class!

I don't think you're getting what he's saying.

Kinda looks like a young Shania Twain (sp?)

Awkward left and right tonight. Harbaugh with an awkward answer and stare at the interviewer. lol

He was an ACC QB first. Saw him at NC State, he was electric!

Richard Sherman, this generations poet.

Buh bye, thanks for playing! Now, lets go Seahawks

2 possessions, 0 first downs for NE. Keep the D going Denver!!!

I agree, likening this game to war victories and the bringing down of the wall. Over the top for sure! Blount going no where Decker is a beast!

I know he's checking back, shaking in his boots to respond. Lol