Jump to content

What a Tuel

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,920
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by What a Tuel

  1. Ok agree. If Josh doesn't have 4 turnovers a game, then we won't have a broncos type year.
  2. Really wish we wouldve grabbed another top WR. I think there is something to be said for defensive players saying Davis doesnt have a great route tree.
  3. Nice moving the goal posts. Are we losing in the playoffs, or having a broncos type year? Get your story straight.
  4. Bills lost to Zach Wilson last year and went 13-3..... The Jets built a defense to stop Allen and imagine that, they did. 🙄
  5. Man some of you are so lame. The guy dates an actress and suddenly he is too into hollywood and not into football. such a stupid line of thought.
  6. Thats fine and he should have saw that, but it doesn't change the fact that Davis can run a better route and prevent an INT and have a sizable gain.
  7. He almost got Allen killed early in the game. Just got blown up. His job is to block and he looked like a running back picking up a defensive lineman.
  8. Which point do you disagree with? Yes, he had a bad game, but it is a good defense too. Josh was taking what was given to him in the 1st half and got antsy in the 2nd half. Especially that 3rd and 2 where we threw for like 12 yards incompletion. Either way, the turnovers were bad but there are certainly explanations on why a DB was able to get the jump on a route for instance. If Davis makes any type of move to freeze the DB, that DB is not going to jump the route. Instead he just runs straight then cuts for the pass.
  9. Mahomes final drive against the lions was 4 plays -15 yards and all they needed was a field goal also.
  10. You are in the wrong thread. The overreaction thread is over there. Allen had a bad game against a good defense, that's clear. The 1st INT was basically a punt. Wish it was a completion, but down it at the 3 yard line, fine. 2nd INT is like wtf are you thinking. 3rd INT is all davis not running good routes and telegraphed his route easily. Fumble, no excuse. Catch the damn snap.
  11. I think its rather the negative fans exist in every fanbase. This one's fans are just emboldened because of our lack of a super bowl and they think they are some accurate predictor of the teams chances when in reality they aren't unique or foretellers. There are thousands just like them on every other forum. Just take a look at the chiefs forums. Tons of negative fans prior to winning the super bowl and after tonights loss, i guarantee there are tons lamenting the decisions of the org. Every fan processes in their own way, and its fair to be annoyed at the negativity the same as they can be annoyed at the excessive positivity. But when push comes to shove, I'd rather be positive and root for my team than pretend I'm the Nostradamus of football and play "told you so" all year long.
  12. You are the reason Josh started limping after Burrow got hurt. Karma is real. Just stop wishing bad on people. Its that simple.
  13. So do they still donate to charity for these or did they drop the charity part now? Also are every other team's little people generic non specific players? They all have double 00 as their numbers except the Bills who have Allen, Knox, and Von Miller.
  14. There have only been 35 Super Bowl winning head coaches in 56 years. You are telling me every other head coach is inept?
  15. It makes them a better team, but people ignore that both Rodgers and Cook (not as bad of a down year) had down years last year and attribute it at least for Rodgers to "just not trying". Rodgers had the most INT's since his rookie year last year, 3rd lowest TDs, 3rd lowest completion %, and least yards in a non injured season. We will see if a new team gives him a spark or if last year is the beginning of the end. I look at Dalvin Cook as just the placeholder for Breece Hall who apparently isn't ready. Breece Hall should be better, so does that really make them better? Yeah, but not better than the Jets with a healthy breece hall.
  16. Scalpers dont help. They only inflate. But to each their own. Also they aren't collectible. They are children's toys remember? 🙄
  17. No one said they are doing something illegal. And it isnt just children's toys either, it also applies to ticket sales. So off base on both counts. The toy scalping are just extra scummy because money went to charity. Fisher Price lowballed demand on the 1st run, and scalpers took advantage. Fisher price shouldve made a 2nd run of the year 1 items and gotten more money for charity rather than the scumbags buying them up and selling them for $150 a pop.
  18. To add some more context the Cleveland drives after it was 28 to 10 were: 28-10 6:45 remaining to play: Run Chubb -1 yards Pass Incomplete Pass Complete 6 yards Pass Complete 6 yards Pass Incomplete Run Hunt 11 yards Pass Incomplete Pass Complete 14 yards Pass Complete 27 yards Pass Complete 7 yards - TD 31-16 1:56 Remaining to play: Pass Complete 12 yards Pass complete 15 yards Pass complete 12 yards QB Run 6 yards Pass incomplete Pass incomplete Pass complete 20 yards Pass incomplete Pass Incomplete Pass complete 2 yards - TD 31-23 - 19 seconds left Bills kneel.
  19. I think that is because the supply was ramped in year 2 up after they saw the demand for the first run in year 1. It is just sickening to me to see these scalpers plotting already. I just imagine how many they are buying from Wegmans and holding hostage. I hope they eat a ton of losses and Fisher Price did a billion batch run of them.
  20. It is really annoying to me bc doesnt this go to charity? So basically a miscalculation in demand means they don't do another run to make more money for charity but scalpers get to exploit the demand?
  21. Pretty sure this is completely overblown and some intern put together a list of QBs drafted since 2013, and Cowherd was just popping off names and wasnt even thinking who Haskins is. Huge mistake sure, but I doubt it was intentional.
  22. Lol. Now you don't know huh and haven't done that research yet. And yet you are over here comparing non inflation adjusted ink and oil costs and how machinery replaced in 2004 has the same efficiency as the new machinery. That cuts in headcount aren't anything and if anything are counteracted by inflated salaries (which I am sure you'll probably find out have lagged behind inflation). That computing hasn't touched the newspaper industry in any meaningful way. But YEAH, you really were only focused on convincing me that inflation exists, not at all that the costs of production have not only not decreased but INCREASED. 🙄 I'll point you towards your example and leave you to continue going round and round with this. It is more like: $1,000,000 x 2.4 inflation equals $2,400,000 in costs without the efficiency improvements. $550,000 x 2.4 inflation equals $1,320,000 in costs with the efficiency improvements. Inflation happens either way however ultimately the cost of production DECLINES.
  23. So you agree then? The cost of production has not exceeded inflation adjusted dollars? So my initial statement we ultimately agree then (which you disagreed with). Glad we had this talk. 😂 Edit: I find it hilarious that you won't provide the actual quotes with timestamps and keep falling back to your recollection of the order of the conversation.
  24. Man dude. People are right, you just can't accept being wrong. You are providing a bunch of links about soaring costs in 2022 compared to what?!? pre pandemic? 1990? 1950? What? As someone who holds themselves in high esteem for intelligence, you must certainly acknowledge that this does not prove that the cost of production in 2023 exceeds inflation adjusted cost in 1990. And again no. Still wrong on this. Funny how you don't provide the context. Talk about shifting goal posts. It isn't my fault that my initial post soared over your head. I literally said accounting for inflation is correct in my initial statement, but that the cost of production likely didn't skyrocket. You responded with random commodities trying to prove that it costs more in 2023 and utterly failing on multiple fronts. You are literally arguing just to argue lol. Either prove it or just stop.
  25. You just can't admit that you are wrong and it is hilarious. The context of the argument started with this post by me: You just quoted an out of context derivation of the argument as preceding the original statement. So no, once again wrong. Again you are so big on evidence, and you made the claim that the cost of producing a newspaper went up from 1990 in 2023. So go for it. Prove to me that the cost of producing a newspaper without quoting random commodities like printer ink which im not even sure is the same ink used in newspapers. And once again take note of the bolded, underlined, italicized statement in my original argument in which I agree accounting for inflation is correct, but now prove that the total costs of production OUTPACED inflation. That alone would prove that the cost of production went up.
×
×
  • Create New...