34-78-83

It's often smart to ponder alternate reasons for what may have occurred. It doesn't tie in as nicely as an agenda, but it's more likely true. Good thoughts.

this ^^

I think thats just wording that Marrone had an issue with. He doesnt see it as a benching, he saw it as an opportunity to settle a player and allowed his defensive staff to deal with it. But right now we don't know... What we DO know is the Bills would have won this game with better QB play overall.

It isn't in your mind.I disagree. Nothing wrong with that. Parcells and Bill Walsh also had two completely different approaches with their players and both succeeded.

Overall not sure why were making a big deal of this anyway... I would have benched him for a while yet another play to keep the opponents O on the field in what the last 5 games in a row? The fact that DM said he didn't means that someone else did (Schwartz) or it was a package thing or fatigue or a combo of a short benching, some package adjustments and some fatigue/ getting a hold of his emotions time. Why is it such a big deal who made the call? This is petty Na no disrespect intended- the yawn was from hearing the same old stuff and I can tell you really believe it so it is more of a surrender on my part in this discussion. Not gonna be worth the effort and not gonna change your mind.

Man you make too much sense tonight

yawwn

Sorry thats just easy old fashioned agenda ... If he did yank Hughes he would have admitted it publicly like he always has in the past.

Marrone didn't bench Hughes soooo now we are just deciding that it's a lie and he DID so we can keep complaining about it?

It gets even more odd then cuz I know Simon and Simon knows his football.Especially secondary play, and I don't think he deserves to be called what you calle d him (not that it would bother him). I don't and won't spend any time on PPP so ... mystery remains. Your football posts today make a lot of sense though

I must have missed something from prior to today?

Well he is correct and seems to have likely either played or coached the game called tackle football at some level the way his posts read today atleast. Or maybe he's just studied the game more than the average Joe. IDK 1st I've seen of him really

you need to post more...

Great Post

those picks are run constantly by all the "elite" teams

D was fabulous...No pressure was possible with the quick throws being utilized. Went down the field deep once and got picked. Completed one other mid range pass.

Nope that wasnt it. Lots of those pass plays were well designed movement plays to the backs (evidenced by FJ's 10 catches) and were effectivielty running plays. They were also down 21-3 so....

pssstStop replying (after this post lol) and the nonsense will quickly flow to page 2

Yes it did

You you fool Mario has been dominant. D has stopped the run consistently all day. A few short yeardage TDs means zilch

Completely untrue about Mario and about stopping the run. You are clearly not watching

Theres our average D again! LMAO

Bills likely aren't going to win this game but any saying our D is not legit is beyond blind.

Can't believe the call vs. Robey. He played it perfect

Proof that he was once capable in a different system? Yes... Certainly it's odd though