Jump to content

NewEra

Community Member
  • Posts

    31,966
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NewEra

  1. Right….. so how much do you wanna pay Gabe Davis this offseason?
  2. Thanks- I don’t think I’ve really seen stats on doubling/bracketing before. I’d like to see what Diggs actual number have been over the last few seasons. Does anyone have access to those stats? Or even just this years? Of all the forced passes to Diggs (and Diggs drops) Davis still has a lower catch %. I know it’s not only on him (uncatchable passes too) but I think we’re going to be able to open up our offense once we replace gabe with a more versatile route runner and reliable pass catcher. like I’ve said- I really like the kid, but he’s not enough to unlock the true potential of this offense. I don’t see how Josh forcing the ball to Diggs is on Diggs. I agree that Diggs’ drops have been a problem, but forcing passes to him isn’t.
  3. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Wrong end zone my man. Only if the offense fumbles the ball out of the end zone they are scoring on. If it’s the other end zone, it’s a safety for the defense….
  4. Reaching is stupid. Got it
  5. About 30% seems like a lot to me, but do you have a link? In order to define “all the time” or “a lot” one would have to compare how often other WRs are being doubled. Link?
  6. Reaching is stupid? Or losing the ball while reaching is stupid? Most players that have the ball near the end zone reach. Most players that approach first down markers reach for the first down markers. Most players are stupid.
  7. In many cases the defense doesn’t always force the fumble. Players also lose the ball while reaching. and has many others have noted- most notably the NFL, the rule is stupid and likely in need of a change
  8. Erik Turner puts time in. He watches every game several times. He understand coverages. He states what he sees. And he sees Diggs being doubled and bracketed- he sees that the opposition is taking his away on 2nd and 3rd down. @Mr. WEO care to back your claim up with something other than “they aren’t”? didn’t think so.
  9. Lol…..incentivize- the offensive team can still lose the ball if they fumble. As I’ve said- if the team fumbles the ball at the 1 yard line and it goes OOB in the end zone and they get the ball at the 20,15,10,5 yard line- how is that incentive? They still get punished for their recklessness. I’ve never said the offensive team should just get the ball at the spot of the fumble. They just shouldn’t lose their opportunity for a FG (or another TD attempt). The way it currently stands, the defense gets a freebie for doing nothing. Being rewarded for the offense “reaching for the goalline”…… as if that’s one sort of crazy idea.
  10. Can you stand it when a player reaches for a 1st down marker midfield on 3rd down? Should the defense be rewarded with the ball if it’s fumbled OOB there too? It’s a risky play at midfield too….. so why reward the O for a risky play? again- can someone answer this: Why reward the defense for doing NOTHING? The offense can still have a negative consequence for the risky play….. and not lose possession while rewarding the D for nothing. The punishment just doesn’t fit the crime And it’ll likely be changed because it doesn’t make perfect sense.
  11. There’s enough jeopardy already. They can fumble and still lose the ball….who knows if the ball is going to go oob or stay in bounds allowing the D to recover. I get why some think there needs to be some jeopardy for the offense. I agree, which is why I think putting the ball at a designated yard line would do just that. If you fumble at the 1 into the EZ oob and get the ball at the 20, 15, 10, 5 yard line, that still results in a negative play for the O equal to a sack or more. rewarding the d for doing absolutely NOTHING makes zero sense to me. I’ve been impatiently awaiting this rule change since inception.
  12. Because the offense always gets the ball back if the defense doesn’t recover it in every other part of the field…. Yet someone, when the offense is about to score…..the defense deserves to get the ball back for doing literally nothing? I think it’s a terrible rule and it seems the league may agree
  13. Did he cite his rookie year? The Mahomes total yards he listed was higher than yours. TDs are the same.
  14. I like the person and the hard worker. I think he will continue to improve in many aspects of playing the position- I’m just not a fan of his athletic ability
  15. I hear ya It’s extensive and and unfair punishment. It’s seems like the nfl agrees and is looking to lessen the blow. From my perusing social media today, the majority of the world agrees and also thinks the punishment is too harsh Anything is an upgrade over its current system. Just don’t give the defense the ball. That’s all I really care about. Finding a common ground beyond that shouldn’t be too tough
  16. This is about the ball going oob in the end zone the offense is trying to score on. Regarding the bolded- how you stated it is how it currently stands. The nfl is talking about changing it because it unfairly rewards the defense/very harsh punishment for the offense This makes sense for sure I could see losing the yards gained as a decent punishment for losing the ball in a key area. As long as the offense keeps the ball, I’m ok with most scenarios. Giving the defense the ball is just insane to me
  17. So you think a defensive team that just stands there and watches a player fumble the ball out of the end zone they’re defending should get 2 points and the ball? 🤦🏻‍♂️
  18. Giving the opposing team the possession of the ball for potentially doing nothing is perfect? 🤷🏻‍♂️ I’d give the ball to the offense somewhere between the 10 and the 20. The defense shouldn’t get the ball unless they recover it imo.
  19. Thanks for the advice. I’ll be sure to take your advice on something
  20. Heard a stat today- Josh allen is the only player in nfl history to account for 35 TDs through 13 games. Saw another stats: that he’s accounted for 84%+ of the Bills TDs this year. By FAR %1 in the league. And he hasn’t scored on 10 tush pushes. If I’m a voter, Purdy and mccaffery cancel each other out. How can 2 players from the same team both guys be “most valuable” in the league when we don’t even know who is the most valuable to their own team? And in reality, neither are the best player on the team. They might not even be top 3 The race should be between Josh, Dak, Lamar and Tyreek imo.
  21. 15-25 wind and rain. I think it’ll have somewhat of an impact
  22. And that it led to a punt I think the Purdy/cmc conundrum could open the door for first place if we run the table and he plays out of his mind. I think Dak will win if they beat us and continue their current level of plays.
  23. Spencer has improved quite a bit this year……but this is 💯 correct. I hope we focus on chipping Parsons. Quinn does a good job of moving him around to make doubling him tougher on the opposition
  24. Bingo. I hope that $674 you made in monthly (and already cancelled) subs was worth your soul
×
×
  • Create New...