I used other words like bloviate as well as negative. I'll give him credit that his opinions have content and he's excellent at communicating his opinion, however he contradicts himself consistently to then. In the end it's to prove in the end that it's always a problem that exists. I guess if I had to re-do my post I would have focused on that vs negative.
For example he said Whaley didn't want Rex, then it's not that Whaley is anti-Rex but he's just resentful because he had to then find players to fit Rex's scheme. They're guesses but he presents them as if he absolutely knows it to be true - but he just so badly wants it to be that Rex isn't the guy.
There's a ton more examples of him doing this and it just annoyed me for some reason today. I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an a-hole or cruel.