It doesn't matter - it's all about a trade partner.
Something that may help you is the QB's in this years draft from best to worst will not be in the same order they were drafted.
I don't think the class is over hyped because there's slow trade activity. That doesn't make any sense to me. 4 of the top 5 picks could be QB so maybe they don't want to trade their pick. The second pick could want to see which QB goes first before they say they don't want one and not even then makes it probable they don't want to stay at 2. 4th pick may not want to trade out. The 5th pick may want to see which QB's are still there.
I think the exact opposite - no trade activity prior to the draft is exactly what I expected.
This guy is taking strength of schedule way too seriously and is probably hoping to reach the more intelligent (most involved) fans. Problem is, the more involved fan already understands the flaws in these guesses based on SOS and this doesn't solve it. It doesn't even help solve it, IMO.
Of course, but I'm feeling confident Beane isn't someone to just look at that. Ball placement, IMO, is the most important. However ball placement without enough arm strength cancels out. You'r right, in that arm strength alone is not enough.
I like the ideas floating around TBD to trade both 1st round picks and pick up a bunch of 2nd and 3rd rounders. Especially since first rounders are such a crap shoot.
Benjamin Allbright
@AllbrightNFL
·
56m
This is an internet rumor that's been around about a week, and when I asked my Browns source he outright laughed.