CodeMonkey

Actually the ChaNix regime is still striving for mediocrity. They haven't achieved it yet.

He hasn't even dressed for a game yet.

That's what I'm saying! A couple months ago Nix was a genius for signing them both. 4 games later, not so much.

That also makes no sense. Stache gets kicked to the curb long before Gailey if things keep going as they are.

F U Bit¢he$. Anyones guess as to who he was referring to.

Chan Gailey for sure. He has 3 built in excuses: 1) Nix agreed with and approved Stache. 2) Nix agreed that Fitz was worth the big contract and was "the man". That alone should get them both fired in my opinion, but I digress. 3) Nix did almost nothing this offseason to bolster the offense. Nix can't fire Gailey without looking inept himself, therefore Gailey stays and Stache becomes the sacrificial lamb if the season continues on it's current path.

That doesn't even make any sense. Stache did nothing different than he did the first 3 games ... come in with a game plan and not alter it at all. Saying he sucks is one thing, and so far anyway is correct. But crooked is something else altogether and unwarranted.

I hope he works out as well as I'm sure all Bills fans do. I agree with you that AFCE games are far too important for him to be M.I.A. and it is extremely disheartening. I don't buy the time to mesh excuse either for DL. But unless some team is willing to give up someone of his potential in a trade I can't see any other course than letting him play and hope he works out of it.

So you are declaring the Mario signing as wrong after 4 games and that is a sign of being open minded? I'd call it reactionary. Yawn. Based on the evidence Nix had at the time, trying to sign Mario WAS the right thing to do. It may or may not work out, it is too soon to tell. Mario has certainly contributed next to nothing so far to be sure. But a bad signing stance this early, to me anyway, is a fan knee jerk response. Not a sign of being open minded. YMMV.

i can't believe this. That would get Stache fired way before Gailey. Whatever Stache is doing, there is no way he is tanking on purpose.

Tannehill doesn't look bad so far to me in the little I have seen him. Red Zone had the fish/cards game on quite a bit after the Bills fiasco, he has one heck of a strong arm and the fish gave the cards all they wanted. No way would I switch teams, but as much as I like Fitz as a person and a leader, I'd switch starting QB's in a heartbeat. Tannehills wife is ridiculously hot as well http://content.usato.../1#.UGmlrFG647w

I'm of the opinion that these guys are supposed to be professionals and should not need Buddy Nix, Chan Gailey or anyone else to babysit them. I find it impossible to believe that Mario or anyone else isn't trying or doesn't care. They are at the top of the pyramid of their profession and they did not get there by dogging it. I have no doubt that Mario and everyone else is trying their best, so far anyway that just aren't prepared enough and/or not skilled enough to win.

That plan worked for the pats* yesterday. Fitz is what he is, no one should expect more from him than he has shown this season. The sooner people realize this the better. Now Chan might be a different story if you bought into the whole "offensive genius", "Jerrah says firing him was his biggest mistake" thing. Stache falls into that category as well. I did not expect more from Gailey but I must admit I did not expect Stache to suck anywhere near this much.

Ouch man, that's harsh

i agree. You let him play out of it, if he is going to. If he does not you re-evaluate during the off season. But he plays as long as he is healthy.

I don't think it is a matter of quitting. More that the pats* coaches adjusted at halftime at least a little (they really didn't have to much, they just needed to eliminate mistakes) and the Bills coaches did what they seemingly always do, stick to the original plan. The difference to me in the second half is that the pats* stayed calm and just came to the realization that they were the better team, then went out and played that way. They seemingly never thought they were going to lose, even when the Bills took the big lead in the 3rd quarter. Some would call that a winners mentality versus a losers mentality.

I have said it before and I still think that Stache went into this season thinking that will all of the quality D line players that he had that he could keep them all fresh and he would never, ever, have to rush more than 4 to get to the QB or stop the run. That was, and unfortunately by the looks of things still is, his one and only plan for the season.

Neither Fred or CJ should have even been in that game. Clearly neither were ready. Rushed back out of desperation by Gailey. Agreed by everyone I'm sure. But it sure doesn't help to hand Marcia good field position for no reason either. I watched the pressers by Fitz and Gailey on the local Bills post game show. Fitz handled it well, but Gailey looked like a tired and beaten old man. No fire, no anger, no answers. Just plain beaten. Making a statement after the 1-2 start to the season. Plus with the way the pats* lost their two games combined with the way the Bills were able to burn the pats* D in the middle of the field he wanted to make damn sure of that W.

Probably because you were expecting a loss. Maybe not the big embarrassment that it was, but a loss. A lot of people here were expecting a win. They had a lot farther of a fall.

Fixed. That's what people were thinking about the pats* until yesterday.

And the 49ers crushed the Jets yesterday. The Jets crushed the Bills 3 weeks ago. No assumptions like yours. How are you liking the transitive property now? Fortunately in the NFL every game is a unique event and even though based on the evidence SF should beat the Bills by 70 or 80 points you just never know.

And now?

Yeah and that same Jets team wiped the floor with the Bills 3 weeks ago.

Suck it up, get amnesia, and try to salvage something out of the brutal stretch that started today. What else can they do?

No mention of the Moorman firing and his replacement?