vincec

Actually, when the Bengals signed him I thought he’d fit right in because he is pretty similar to the LBs you’ve had in this regard. The Glenn trade will be boom or bust. If he returns to consistent health then he will be a steal for you. He is an elite tackle when healthy. Plus he can play guard in a pinch (? inside joke)

This is all nice, but did they sign him?

To be honest, if the rookie they draft can't beat out McCarron then there may be a more serious problem.

Hughes is the only proven pass rusher on the DL. It would be a giant setback to lose him in a division with Tom Brady.

If the Bills don’t take a QB in round 1 then this offseason will have been a total disaster, IMO.

I cant say that I agree with you on this. Brady is still the king of the AFCE. If th Bills plan on beating him then they need a heck of a lot better pass rush than they are likely to get with the current group. They need an interior pass rusher to replace K Williams, plus another DE that can rotate with Hughes and Murphy (even if he comes back fully from his injury and avoids suspension)

Yes he would, but I don’t think the personality or dollars fit.

The reason to be unhappy is that McCarron doesn’t really represent a strong plan B if the new rookie QB isn’t ready to start. He has never been a starter and has some real question marks as to whether he ever could be a successful one. I am fine with dumping Taylor, but he was a .500 starter. That was a legitimate short term plan B.

If you are saying that it’s just as likely that McCarron, a career backup behind Andy Dalton, who was the last QB to sign in feee agency is just as likely to throw for 4,000 yards and 30 TDS as to lose out to Peterman as a backup then you don’t really have a grasp of reality. Or probabilities. But I agree with one thing: our conversation is done,

You making up impossible stuff and claiming that it’s just as probable as realistic options? Yeah, actually I see that everyday in the alternative news media so I’m very familiar with it.

Well, obviously. That’s some crack hindsight reporting.

McCarron may not even beat out Peterman, let alone a #2 or #3 overall selected QB (assum8ng the Bills get one). This acquisition accomplishes very little, IMO.

Peterman.

Still need to be looking at DL in round 1, IMO (assuming we still have another pick left after QB). DT or DE would both work.

Yes. Bad.

If they had drafted Watson then they’d be a year ahead of where they are now. And that’s assuming that they can get a comparable QB this year, which has yet to actually happen.

Well that about covers it. They're looking at all FA QBs. Nice scoop.

Brees Luck Cousins Manning Foles Darnold

Given that the Bills look to be rebuilding and 2 or 3 years away from contention at least, I'd be very surprised if Kyle Williams returns.

Don't like this move. Good LTs are very valuable and the Bills don't have 2 good tackles right now so he would have a been a great bookend with Dawkins.

Does this mean that he is going to bring to a close his relentless search for the true killers?

A 0 win team that’s about to draft his replacement in a few weeks? I doubt that Taylor sees this as the best destination.

I think the article at the link above pretty much answers the question.

Josh Gordon will not like that.

Exactly. Bad news for Winston...