All_Pro_Bills

You must think yourself clever by believing that by simply invoking Putin you're entitled to shut down any sensible or intelligent debate no matter the topic. No matter how comical that answer might be. You're wrong. And anybody with the ability to comprehend and form a logical argument should just ignore your nonsense.

Asking if a poster "agrees" with Putin is a transparent attempt to discredit their opinion without providing any opinion of your own or any argument as to why their view might be incorrect. I'm certainly not convinced the US was the actor here, but I also don't think it was Russia. As I said before, they could just turn off the valve and stop the flow. If anyone thinks Russia blew up their own pipeline, I'd like to hear what credible and logical argument they could make to support that conclusion.

If the Russians wanted to disrupt gas flows through NordStream 1/2 they could just shut the valve. Word is while Germany was talking up unity in support of Ukraine they were working a backroom deal with Russia for gas and about to break ranks with the US. One likely scenario is the US administration being aware, decided to put an end to that possibility. Add that the damage and explosions suggest only a State actor would be capable of pulling this off and the list of suspects is short.

Do you expect a President to personally vet all the people working in their administration and be accountable for life? I mean Biden sniffs women's hair and according to accounts from his daughter's diary, took showers with her when she was a teenager and his son is a sexual pervert and drug addict. Are you going to preach and point about how that reflects poorly on Joe's character? I doubt that.

What's most curious about all of this is the roaring silence of the women's rights movement and leadership and their unwillingness to defend the rights of young women when science and the eye test clearly put them at a competitive disadvantage. Instead, biological women who assert their claim to fairness in competition must be silenced and intimidated into obedience.

I'm listening. Maybe I overlooked something? What new military engagements were initiated during the Trump administration? And to state it perfectly clear, the original statement was "new" engagements. Not continuing or expanding or contracting anything that might have started under Bush or Obama or earlier.

A 4 year stretch with no new conflicts, with conflicts both before and after, suggest you're wrong.

Most likely Trump would have given Russia assurances that Ukraine would not be added to NATO and the war would have been avoided and Ukraine would have gone on their merry way as an independent democracy and would not be engaged in a bloody and costly conflict. There would have been no sanctions and Europe and other impacted countries would not have been harmed. The inflation, and supply disruptions the world is experiencing would not have happened. But Biden won the election, brought back Victoria Nuland the official who engineered the Madian coup in 2014, to finish the job, refused to engage in any meaningful discussions, and flooded the region with arms. Then Russia invaded. And in April when parties like Turkey had brokered a peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine, Boris Johnson was dispatched to Kiev to deliver the message to Zelensky that the US and UK would not allow any truce or peace deal and the war would continue. And it goes on. So yeah, maybe it could have been avoided or at a minimum ended already. I should add, anyone thinking the main US interests are in supporting Ukrainian democracy was dropped on their head too many times. The US interest is to weaken Russia and maintain the uni polar world order both Moscow and Beijing and other countries threaten. Ukrainian blood and territory is just the proxy and acceptable sacrifice to support that goal.

European Commission head mistress Ursula von der Leyen had warned Italian voters before the election about voting for the "wrong" candidates and the consequences they might face if the right kind of leader was not elected. The right leader being somebody that fully supported the EU, the IMF, NATO, the WEF, climate activism, woke ideology, and other core neo-liberal beliefs and causes. But that warning fell on deaf ears. Other European leaders have since voiced the battle cry of the left with the standard "threats to democracy" concerns. Translated, threats to their ruling class system where voters dare to elect a candidate they feel represents their interests. Democracy in action. How dare you! Sadly for the ruling elite, this trend of political movements representing the people is popping up all over Europe as a result of sanctions and policies that are crushing the people.

And the 6 Fall Mum plants my wife puts out that die or get eaten by Deer every year will now run me about $30.

Current storm track has the eye wall coming onshore between Sarasota and Ft. Myers. So the Tampa area might be spared the brunt of the storm surge but with rain forecasts of up to 24 inches flooding is going to be extreme.

Its the economy, and crime. Watch for lots of big corporate employers announcing job cuts and lay offs (or what they might call workforce right-sizing) after the mid-term elections.

There are people from dozens of countries, maybe more, I lost count. Some from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East that traveled to Mexico to walk across the border. They're seeking better economic conditions, not fleeing political oppression.

One problem is this administration is applying the definition and criteria for "asylum seekers", which is someone fleeing political persecution, to 100's of thousands that are in reality crossing the border seeking economic opportunity. The political persecution angle is like a free pass as the economic criteria is harder to meet. Obviously, Biden's administration knows this is a blatant misrepresentation.

It's a recurring theme and what's troubling is the pattern of repeating the same type of error in the face of overwhelming evidence that the strategy is faulty and ineffective at the most critical moments.

The fake liberals love to conjure up all sorts of "crimes" in an attempt to redirect the main theme of the story when somebody embarrasses them and exposes their hypocrisy. In this case they welcome and embrace everybody, just not to their community or neighborhood.

Wow. The board clown is throwing every fake cliche, slogan, narrative, meme, and defection tactic in the social justice play book at you while refusing to engage in any constructive conversation and you're holding strong. Bravo!

Its only a matter of time before they all show up at the Texas border requesting asylum.

What I hate most is that if the Bills had their complete opening day starting line up healthy yesterday they would have blown them out to something like 45-10.

We're all disappointed they didn't pull this one out but the fact is the Bills were out-manned from a roster standpoint before the game started and lost players during the course of the game and still were just one play away from pulling out the win. You got a complete back up secondary with back ups to back ups coming in later. Defensive tackle starters out, offensive linemen dropping like flies during the game, receivers puking and cramping, and injured, and oppressive sun, heat, and humidity. Who exactly did anyone expect would put the team on his back given those circumstances? I didn't hear what Cowherd had to say but I watched Get Up on ESPN and Rex Ryan mentioned how the sun, heat, and humidity gives the Dolphins a huge advantage in their September home games and the biggest factor in this game was where and when it was played. The other guys talked about how great Tua was throwing for a pedestrian 186 yards against a complete 2nd string secondary and how well Miami's defense played giving up 497 yards to a depleted offense. Which leads me to believe these guys commenting on the game don't even watch it except for maybe a couple highlights. Ironically, the Bills lose the game and move into the #1 spot for total defense yards allowed at 214 per game. Miami's defense drops to 31st. The only team rated worse is our next opponent, the Ravens.

This sounds like another boogie man invented by the cult of chaos to distract voters from the horrendous record of the administration going into the mid-terms. They're desperate so they need to use fearmongering and distraction. As their record sucks.

Before the 3rd and 22 play I was expecting them to bring the pass rush and put the hammer down but I was disappointed once again by the lack of situational awareness in the defensive play call at that moment. Situation being, you've got them down, now put them out, and don't hang out your 3rd string secondary.

When the Dolphins visit OP in December somebody should make sure the hot water and heat in the visitors locker room isn't working that day.

It's the only NFL game I've ever seen where dominating in time of possession with 40:40 was a negative given the Sun, heat, and humidity and the toll it took on the offensive players not acclimated to those conditions.

The Bills pattern of losing these close games has to stop. The Bills didn't play a very sound game on offense but still managed almost 500 yards and an overwhelming advantage in time of possession with 40:40. But there were a lot of mistakes too. And their offense was just not very efficient today. They left 3 points on the field at the end of each half. They did a poor job of clock management. Considering Morse was out and all the shuffling the offensive line and receivers going down in the heat the statistical advantage was mindboggling, but they went 2-4 in the redzone. Overall, the defense held up pretty well given all the starters out including the entire secondary. For all the hype about Miami's new high-powered offense they failed to live up to all the pre-game hype with only two scoring drives to show for their efforts (the other was the fumble recovery at the Bills 7). What did Hill today? 2 catches for 33 yards. I'll take that every day.