All_Pro_Bills

Wondering what left leaning NGO funds this operation?

Republicans against Trump? The might as well call themselves "Chronic losers that are content with finishing in 2nd place in a 2 horse race". While I like Rand Paul he's too much of an idealist. And in my experience idealists don't get much done.

Protect the football. In 4 losses the Bills have turned the ball over 11 times (NE = 3, Atl = 2, Mia = 3, Hou = 3). That's losing 11 possessions and scoring opportunities and giving the opponent points of turnovers chances. 2 of 4 of the losses were one score games. Lose the turnover battle on the road in the playoffs and its an early off season.

Every game is different. And sometimes the result is unexpected. Look at the Rams on Sunday. Who had the Panthers here? Honestly, I thought the Bills were going to lose to Pittsburgh. So I didn't expect the Bills would be able to run all over the Steelers defense and I didn't expect the Bills defense to be so good against the run either. Maybe the 10 day mini-bye gave the defense time to iron out all their problems? If they perform down the stretch the same way then good things can happen. The Bengals are 31st against the run but seem to be trending up a bit. The Bills 30th and looking the same. And obviously their passing game with Burrow back and Higgins and Chase at WR will be superior to the Steelers offense. To win I expect the Bills will need to be efficient in the run game but the passing game needs to contribute a lot more. I'm not sure what the status is for Kincaid's availability, or Dawkins, Brown, Palmer, or how much a week more of time for Cooks to come up to speed on the offense will do. A big question is how the pass defense plays against top-end WR's. The weather forecast for Sunday is cold, cloudy, and not a lot of wind so that might not be a factor. I think its critical the passing game becomes at least functional before the playoffs to have a chance of advancing past the wild card round.

And nobody I know is cheering on these speed boat attacks.

Not that I knew much of anything about him or was ever a fan, but that's the way the the most rabid and politically indoctrinated on the left reacted to Charlie Kirk's murder. The public record of their blood-lust is undeniable. So who does that 1984 quote really describe?

An interesting question. But I could pose the exact same question to the anti-Trump folks here. Isn't it risky to criticize an authoritarian dictator that sends "Nazi death squads" out into the night to eliminate his detractors and political enemies? Why are the group of six that dare to question the orders given by the supreme ruler even still alive? Shouldn't they, at a minimum, be in some interment camp undergoing re-education? Why are these anti-ICE demonstrators still out on the streets? Causing trouble for the regime's terror squads in the round-up of innocent "brown people". Shouldn't 21st century Hitler have given the "illegal order" to eliminate them in a hail of gunfire or ship them off to some secret concentration camp? And gotten away with it all because, well he's a dictator?

It works pretty well for the drug dealers. Do you understand In their business showing compassion and empathy is a sign of weakness?

Sometimes understanding a person's motives for saying something is more important than what they say.

Posters understand that legal concept. But no war or conflict involving armed forces anywhere, ever, operated with legal counsel driving missions in the field. And what concepts do the drug cartels operate under? Many here demand mercy for people that would show them none. Amusingly naive. Their argument is 90% it's Trump doing it.

Generally well-to-do white liberals that claim to champion the causes of oppressed and neglected people they don't want living in their neighborhood.

Somebody give that judge a demonstration of reality and set her on fire!

According to two sources. Is that the journalist school rule for making up a fake story? One undisclosed source is not enough and three sounds like too many. LOL. What nonsense.

Andril Yermak, close political ally and power broker for Zelnsky has resigned amid corruption charges. The timing is interesting given negotations on a peace deal. What it means isn't clear yet.

The root cause being the cluster fook run under Biden & Mayorkis that apparently vetting zero entrants.

How will the liberal MSM play this? 1. Sob story 2. Racism. 3. Provoked by fascists. 4. Ignore it as much as possible. 5. All the above.

But performing illegal mass surveillance on opposition members of Congress without credible probable cause is fine and crossed no legal or ethical boundaries.

This teams personnel decisions in draft and free agency have been bottom third of the league. But making the playoffs is always better than missing them. Because it gives the team a chance. Maybe they catch fire at the right time? Given all the injuries and gaps in the roster, WR as one glaring deficiency, it seems improbable this version of the Bills is going to make a run for the title. Playoffs or not it might be time for a change of GM and HC. Leadership is simply too invested in sticking with their current approach and refuse to deviate from their plan regardless of the facts and changing situation. We can't have another draft in 2026 reaching for defensive line and secondary help in almost every round of the draft. And failing. The obstacle to this any change is obvious, Terry Pegula. He's invisible. What does he really think about this team? Nobody knows. I can't recall him making a single public statement about the team over the course of several years. Clearly, this owner isn't prone to making quick decisions but he can't want until Josh Allen's prime years are all used up to come to the realization most posters on the board have already arrived at that this GM/HC combo is not going to take this team over the finish line. A parallel to this might be how Bengals ownership stuck with Marvin Lewis for 16 seasons. Marvin was a good coach but he was 0-7 in the playoffs and team finally made the move to replace him with current coach Zac Taylor. Let's hope Pegula doesn't wait 16 seasons to figure it out. All he needs to know to make a change is right in front of his face. Waiting another season or two or more will just put off the necessary decision.

I think the problem with AI isn't technology. It's the absence of any open and rational discussion of the social and economic benefits and consequences and how those are distributed across society. Right now it's a race to deploy and then deal with the consequences later. Because if the investment world and its proponents think 10's of millions of workers are going to sit back and watch their jobs disappear and their life prospects evaporate while fat cat corporations, finaciers & banks, and moguls get richer while the huge majority of people suffer, AI proponents are high on some good drugs. And don't throw some idea out there like poverty level universal income. Because tha won't fly. The problem is the benefits are concentrated with the few and the costs are borne by the many. If these clowns think we have affordability and income inequality now just wait. I'll even say it's not that the technology is going to eliminate workers. It the revolutionary scale, speed, and impact of those job losses which make it impossible to have enough time for workers and businesses to adapt to new jobs and skills.

It might be a revelation for the ages but maybe the defensive genius should devise a scheme and system that is both easy to learn and effective? Because I watch in complete amazement several games each and every week of the season as other team's defense has rookies and second year players making an impact. And I wonder why aren't we drafting players like this? Bigger, smarter, faster, more instictive, and better football players making plays.

I've been drained of any optimism that Beane is going to fill any roster holes after many seasons of failing to do it. In fact, I'm not sure that's the best approach to restocking the roster. I'd rather see them going BPA at whatever position that might be. Getting some playmakers and serious talent at any position will do more to raise the level of play on either offense and defense rather than reaching for need which has failed as evidenced by spending so much on the D line for no big improvements year after year or drafting the 7th best corner vs. for example the best center or safety. I think that's more how teams like the Eagles, Ravens, and Chiefs approach it.

It would be out of character for 17 to raise a stink and make demands but it's probably the only thing that would force some needed changes.

This is 100% overdue and necessary but I'd say there's a 10% chance of this happening because the owner has gone missing.

The coverage scheme is locate the nearest receiver and then attempt to position yourself as far away from the receiver as possible while remaining on the playing field.

This team is a result of the cumulative effect of many seasons of drafting at the back end of the round combined with poor choices and bad college player evaluation along with over paying players on second contracts that fail to play up to thelr pay grade. Add in hit and miss free agent moves and stubornly ignoring the WR postition in a passing league. Which leaves them with an MVP QB, a great RB, and not much else. Not much talent. That's just it. See for yourself. Pick the top 5 players at each position on both offense and defense out of all the players on all the teams and with the exception of Allen and Cook what Bills player is top 5 in the league at his position? Even top 10? This is all on the GM.