Jump to content

All_Pro_Bills

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills

  1. You can reference contact with officials from Mongolia and Liechtenstein too if you want. That isn't synonymous with collusion. You got nothing. Give it up. The investigation is closed.
  2. So your beef isn't with me here. Its with Mueller. If you think he missed something then call him out. Demand they re-open the investigation. Write your Senators and Congressional Representative. As of right now they completed their work without indicting anyone for collusion or any other crimes. Because anything you or I know they know too. They spent about a year and 1/2 investigating with a team of Trump hating lawyers and investigators. But the investigation and the matter are closed. Nobody has been tired, convicted, or imprisons for any crime. I am accepting that. You cannot. Let's just focus on the 1/6 "insurrection" which I expect will suffer the same fate.
  3. Given the figurehead President's approval rating has been in a descending trend since Inauguration Day and continues its plunge towards zero your view does not reflect the consensus opinion. I suggest a disconnect exists between your perception of what's going on and reality.
  4. Now Fauci has been exposed and busted for $1.8M funding some research on Beagle puppies in that hot-bed of clinical research Tunisia. Seems the NIH sent the money which was used to tie down the animals and expose their faces, which were apparently caged, to infectious sand flies which ate away at the flesh of their faces. Some had their vocal cords severed so the researchers did not have to tolerate and hear their barking and cries. I guess we can add funding the torture of puppies to the good doctor's resume. What else has this sadistic SOB done? Don't worry. You can trust the health and safety of your children to this prick. No worries though, the MSM loves and protects Fauci.
  5. You sound delusional here. The moment of truth has arrived. Present some evidence. Not opinions, not tweets, not subjective or anecdotal stories. Real, hard facts that have passed the burden of proof. Produce the specific names of Trump campaign and administration people and the names of their Russian "contacts" along with dates they met and what they discussed? All things the Mueller team investigated and research but came up empty. Because none of it ever happened in real life. Your contention there is some grand cover-up is irrational given the facts. Everyone is involved in a cover-up. Even Mueller? And his band of Trump-hating lawyers?
  6. Not that you'll believe anything I present but the Clinton campaign generated and FBI enabled Russian collusion hoax. Fake intell which they knew was fake, fake justification for FISA warrants that everyone involved knew was fake which is a crime the FBI committed, investigation into fake events and connections which everyone knew never happened. Something zealots on the left continue to believe is real regardless of a complete absence of facts. But that's what zealots do, believe their own lies. That's why they cling to 1/6 conspiracy theory and this illegitimate and undemocratic committee (Nancy rejected all the minority names submitted she didn't like and ignored House rules on committee appointments) as a do-over. The danger is that another failure and fatal blow here to their psyche will be too much for the faithful to handle. I suspect they should prepare for another loss as nobody is charged for anything remotely close to insurrection. So now the focus will be away from the actual event with an eye towards drumming up some "suspicions" and "circumstantial" type conclusions regarding imaginary insurrection planning conspiracies Facts do not matter to the Committee. They'll issue some fake report and attempt to enact more authoritarian restrictions on individual freedom and label anyone opposing their conclusions as a supporter of tyranny. Which is ironic. Tyrants calling other people tyrants.
  7. The libs embrace State authority because they believe it will be used to suppress and punish their social and political enemies. They will find much to their surprise the State is only concerned with the welfare of the State. And for their obedience they will suffer the same fate. Useful idiots..
  8. I always thought the "big lie" was "I'll just put the tip in".
  9. Its the breakdown of overly complex systems at work. And some light should be shined on the architects of the globalization policies that gutted US manufacturing capacity, killed millions of jobs and thousands of small towns and cities, along with enabling the rise of China as a world power. Professing a process of engagement would make the Chinese system more like us. Swing and a miss on that. Right now Xi seems worse than Mao. All this for saving at everyday low prices and producing mostly poor quality junk consumer products that break in a couple years. So I guess the rule that you get what you pay for still applies. If the Scarecrow had a brain the administration might generate an idea to maybe, just maybe, look at concept of making mission critical products and components domestically. And for a few pennies on the dollar avoid the 10,000 miles supply chain problems. And eliminate sending hundreds of billions in trade to our enemies.
  10. This piece by Glenn Greenwald on the left's objectives (hint: its not defending democracy) and obsessed mindset on the 1/6 committee. Among the insights of the left is this quote, "they have become the worst kinds of fanatics: the ones who really believe their own lies." A statement that will resonate with many here and trigger rage in others. Definitely worth the read: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/feeding-the-liberal-flock-the-real/
  11. What Trump did may have been morally questionable but it wasn't illegal. So what's your point? If you constantly suggesting Trump is some reckless law breaker and this is your go-to example of his transgressions then it would seem you don't have much of a case.
  12. This thing is, aren't almost all political campaign ads disinformation by definition? Candidate number one's campaign says he's a saint and candidate number 2 is the son of Satan. And visa versa. Here we have a Governors election in November. I swear there are four guys running and not two. Example being good governor Murphy that saved civilization from a deadly virus and looks out for everybody and bad governor Murphy that killed thousands of seniors and taxes the citizens of the state to death.
  13. Didn't we all see this coming from a mile away? If you don't comply and get your ninth booster shot then you can't go to the market or socialize in public settings. Lucky for you though. As most people you know have already died from heart failure or other complications after the 6th and 7th boosters.
  14. While in office they do favors for wealthy citizens and corporations then after leaving public service get $10 million book deal advances for a book nobody will read and 6 digit speaking engagement fees to talk about things nobody cares to hear about. And corporate BOD seats while getting generous compensation and stock options. Quid Pro Quo.
  15. Like the fantasy that anyone in the campaign colluded with the Russians in 2016. Russia is the Left's equivalent of the search for Bigfoot. Lots of unsupported claims, stories, and myths but no proof or physical evidence. So far the discovery of things Russian is limited to something they've discovered in the Salad Dressing isle of the Super Market. 5 years and nothing but the dream lives on!
  16. Neither of those combo's stand an ice cube's chance in Hell of carrying the electoral map given their place on the far left side of the political spectrum. In 2020 they trotted out Biden as the face of the moderate center because all the far-left candidates polled poorly in a general election contest. Then once the "moderate" won they pulled the bait and switch to a far left platform and agenda. Can they pull off the same trick again? A problem regardless of the Democratic ticket is that Biden will be blamed for what I expect will be a historic economic, social, and political disaster consistent with the experience of the Great Depression. But this time rather than a deflationary depression it will be an inflationary depression. Anybody can cry and moan and blame Trump but nobody blames Calvin Coolidge for the Great Depression. It was Hoover in charge and history will record it was Biden in charge this time. My view is certainly contrarian to what the majority expects but since when does the majority see any turning point or event coming? And depending on how bad it gets it might be a generation before they win the White House again.
  17. But he could have produced indictments and evidence against other conspirators both domestic and international, convened a grand jury to hear those indictments and charges, arrest warrants could have been issued, arrests made, charges brought against them, juries convened, evidence heard from prosecutors and defense counsel, verdicts rendered by juries, and the guilty sentenced by the courts. But nothing. Why? Because there was nothing. It was all fictional, circumstantial, or there was simply no evidence.
  18. Anything the minimizes or eliminate rational or irrational fear of severe illness and death is forbidden as that would inhibit the ability to control people. If nobody was afraid to die then the mandates and restrictions would be viewed as foolish. Power hates and fears truth and free exchange of ideas. Ivermectin is available, relatively cheap, and has an established history of use and safety for several indications. Of course you wouldn't know that from media reports and stories about veterinary use. Is it effective against COVID? I don't know. What I do know is various officials and "experts" don't want us to find out if it is effective.
  19. To facilitate an open border policy rename Canada to North Mexico.
  20. It was some made for TV fictional movie certain people here saw and they were so wasted they still think they were watching 60 minutes.
  21. Everybody knows if you ask that question the next day you get a hunting trip invite from daddy. And before you know what happened your face gets mistaken for a Quail flying out of the bushes and you're apologizing to Dick for him shooting you in the face..
  22. I'm not answering the question because your binary argument is irrelevant. You seem to be missing my primary theme in all my posts. My core position on every issue is that I'm against anything that gives the State more power over the individual to steal their freedoms and rights. Plain and simple. Anything that enhances the power of the security and surveillance state. Or the deep state. Or the globalist cabal. Whatever you want to call it. Threats to freedom. Threats to democracy. Threats to the Constitutional form of government. Suffering and hardship caused by government, their agents, and allies. Whether they be in government, business, or the media, or anywhere else. I'm not for or against all liberal causes or objectives or for or against all conservative causes. What I'm against are those on both sides of the isle that enable the imposition of control of citizens and curtailing or inhibiting their rights as individuals. And my primary issue with most liberals is they are complete fakes. Traditional liberals would never support any policy that curtails our freedoms and gives power to a malevolent central government. The current crop of neo-liberals seems to rejoice in stealing the rights of others. These are the people I oppose. They are the threats. And yes, certain elements on the right seek the same purpose. And I oppose them too. But you keep going back to Trump. Trump is a distraction. Being fixated about him while the agents and security apparatus of State slips in the back door and steals everything plays right into the hands of the State. The real threat. The State is the party that is spying on me, eavesdropping on my conversations, recording all my posts and comments, snooping into my bank account, telling me where I can go or what I can do. All together we can stop this.
  23. Big surprise! Her family are sitting members of the security and surveillance state. If she wasn't then she wouldn't be on the committee. What else does anyone expect her to say? The conclusions and findings of this committee are already decided.
  24. I suspect the indicators and statistics will show the economy is close or already in recession and the stock market is mis-pricing the impact of inflation and a contracting economy. One thing masking this is that about 20 to 25 large cap companies represent the majority of the market's capitalization. Watch these big cap stocks closely. When they start to break down that is a signal.
  25. I'm interested in hearing your personal view on the meaning of democracy. Not the viewpoints of others or what other people did or didn't do.
×
×
  • Create New...