All Activity

Better check those record books fbm... It was 98 yards and Josh tied it 2 years ago in Pittsburgh to Gabe. I'll never forget that call though. Gus Johnson "T.O., OOOOHHHHHH"

rounding has nothing to do w it...if you walk through 5.25 parking spaces you are in the 6th space its meaningless because, among other things, top 5 is a completely arbitrary cutoff super bowl 50 featured the 6th highest QB cap hit in Manning and the 3rd highest cap hit at WR in Demaryius Thomas

Coleman Prediction for season Targets 100 Targets per game 5.8 Catches 60 Catch Rate 60% Per Catch 14.1 Yards 850yds TDs 8 I have the catch rate even under average numbers at usually 63.3% I believe this is a floor for a full rookie season from Coleman especially if he starts all 17 games . If he doesn't reach this threshold I close to it that's gonna be a problem.

You sum exactly my point with Carter (who I don't dislike, just think took him earlier than I would). There was a run a DTs. They needed a DT and therefore their choice at the end of the 3rd round was about filling that gap. That is exactly what I think happened, potentially above and beyond board value. Especially as they wanted a DT last year too and didn't get one and it has left them in a bit of a hole with Ed basically the only DT on the roster beyond the immediate short term. On Davis he was my R6. I had a pretty clear top 5 - four of whom went day 2 and Wright who the Dolphins gave up a 2025 3rd for early on day 3. Davis is a good back and he was my best of the rest. Again they had a big hole behind Cook. It was a need. But is still a low premium position. Cook is still more talented. He is going to be RB1. So it is a 4th rounder for someone who at least the next two years is a backup running back.

On Paper it doesn't look like enough but I think some people here are underestimating what Shakir role will be in this offense. I got Shakir Targets 130 Targets per game - 7.64 Catches 95 Catches Catch Rate 73% Per Catch 14.5 Yards 1377 yds

Also McC & Chinn and last but not least Brian Burns. Seems like we only want the Garbage the Panthers have.

Kupp has now signed a huge 3-year $80M deal. In 2022. But when they won the SB, Kupp was on a 3-year $47M deal, by no means a top five deal. Julio signed a $22M deal the same year Kupp signed that contract. The top 11 guys were making $16.2M or more. https://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/nfl/2020/03/04/highest-paid-wide-receivers-nfl-ranking-wrs-salary-2020-season/4953433002/ Which made sense at the time. His first four years he put up 869, 566, 1161 and 974 yards, with respectively 5, 6, 10 and 3 TDs. He was a good receiver, but it wasn't till his Super Bowl year going 1947 with 16 TDs that he looked like a #1.

Where have I not accepted that?

If it's prime definitely TO and Evans why because nobody will stop are offense they will average 45 per game. If it's prime and players that played in the playoffs at one pt Moulds & TO If it's strictly drought players u have to go Peters and Evans or u know what if it's pre injuries Sammy I'm taking I'm at Wr over Evans .

He needs to be converted to TE! He can possibly be the next Darren Waller if he works hard enough.

Yeah, it's a narrow lens. But that's no reason not to look at it that way. Just the opposite, in fact. It's precisely that narrow lens that we're trying to fit through. We made the Super Bowl four years in a row. Didn't win one. Do teams look at us to see how we did it? Hell, no. The goal is winning a Super Bowl. Of course you're going to look at how the winners did it. If having a narrow lens were a problem, you wouldn't ever look at narrow lenses. And making a Super Bowl isn't much less narrow. It's just more convenient for folks who don't like the results when you only look at the winners. Same with the final four. It's less narrow, but still very narrow. We already made that group you're talking about. We were a top four team in 2020. Did you feel you got to the top of the mountain? If anything, looking at the final four tells you just what we need to be looking at. We've been a damn good team, extremely competitive, for years now. We need to know how to take the next step. Making the top four is NOT the goal. So yeah, you're right that "it can be done," to make the top four doing that. You found, what 6 teams? There are probably more. So if six or more teams got that high but none of them made it to the mountaintop, that in itself tells you something. We need to know how to differentiate ourselves from the top four into the top one. So if paying a QB and a WR both is the way into the top four but not the top one, we should be looking at finding a way to win a Lombardi, not just to get to the top four. The salary cap years are over 30 years now. That's statistically signficant. How many teams in those years have paid both a QB and a WR? Now how many of those teams were competitive for a championship? 25? 50? And none of them won? That's statistically significant.

Why? No one had to search for Ashley's.

If he's a Pat Williams I'm happy! 😄

Lyin' Biden has no chance. They're trying to hide how old he looks, Kammy is a disaster no one wants near the Presidency, inflation is making things worse for everyone and there's no pandemic to sell this time around. Oh and no one believes J6 was an insurrection anymore.

MAGAs are like...that one family member nobody likes to talk about. You'd still like to see good things happen for them, despite their unfortunate shortcomings and general cringe. Still family, right????

3 out of the 5 made it to a SB... So....

Give me the 2014 version of Mario and Josh throwing to the 2001 version of TO.

that pesky freedom of press...sucks to be an american imagine having the right to petition your government with a redress of grievances? what a pain in the ass

In a year that made the most sense to double dip at wr, Beane chose not to. And my reasoning was simply 2 factors. First, you may not see another pool of wr talent in a draft like this for several years. Second, it acts as an insurance policy in case Coleman doesn't pan out. It wouldn't of killed BB to grab Franklin or Walker in the mid rounds. No one is rooting for Keon to shine more than me. But if he struggles, it will go down in "Beane Lore" as a collasal mistake.

Why wouldn't Hardy (CB pick) be in the running for the returner jobs? Seems like his most immediate value is clearly there. Because he's a rookie? Seems like mentally the easiest onboarding in all of NFL football, being a returner. Shakir and Samuel both seem like guys who could be all right with the new kickoff structure. Only the Rams, above, have actually won a SB. So...

And if he doesn’t and the offense stalls it’s because ‘no receivers’.

People here will criticize this signing but praise the signing of Claypool. Make it make sense.

Sure it does 21/4 = 5.25 rounds down to 5. I've never known anyone to round that up to 6.