All Activity

Found Roundy. Absolutely. Love. It. Make sure you watch this pos become a quivering puddle once in custody.

🚨You won't believe this one. A new a peer-reviewed paper in a journal from publishing giant Taylor & Francis is titled "What Puppygirls Know? The (in)Human Pedagogy of a Trans Feminine Style." The author describes "puppygirls" as "trans lesbians that are also dogs. Not literally, of course – but also not entirely figuratively." The paper argues that centering humans in transgender identities is "ciscentric." As the author puts it: "I argue for the possibility of reading the puppygirl style as a critical practice: one that hints at ways of being trans that do not rely on the ciscentric understanding of 'the human' as their point of reference." In other words, the paper suggests expanding the idea of "trans" beyond crossing sex boundaries to include crossing species boundaries. You aren't only the sex you weren't "assigned at birth"—you might also be the species you weren't assigned. It gets darker: "A puppygirl may not even know she is a puppy, and needs to have this status imposed through loving, but forceful means." "A puppygirl is a good girl. She does not necessarily have a say in whether she is good… the reward for this loss of self-determination is the unconditional, effusive affirmation of her desire." The paper is by Jay Szpilka, a lesbian trans woman (i.e., a straight man) who also identifies as a puppygirl. Read my more in-depth breakdown of the article. 📰realityslaststand.com/p/puppygirls-a… Or watch/listen to @eva_kurilova and I discuss it on the Citation Needed podcast. 🎙️citationneededpodcast.com/p/what-puppygi…

The crowd was very meh when they played it during Sunday’s saints game

Translation: Please buy lots of white merchandise so we can make more money. I have the ice white hoodie which I think is great, however I hate the jerseys as it makes them look like the cowboys

You should pay more attention to what people’s general thoughts on politicians are here at a political subforum. Only a dozen people visit here so it shouldn’t be that hard. as to the rest of your post - absolute horseshit. An incredibly lame attempt to spin what you have said. There was never a “more fit” or “fitter than”. Your comments have been clear. I have catalogued them repeatedly. Joe Biden is mentally fit for the most important job in the world is what you said. Even after watching him bumble through the debate. A credible person in your position would have watched that abortion and said “good god, was I ever wrong about Biden’s mental fitness. I’m still voting for him because I hate Trump”. A non-credible person went with:

Blue Waldo it is!

Many want Simmons, he’s 31…

23-17 Bills

Yes!! An extension at a bit lower level.

24-21 Buffalo. Monday morning, the Bills are 5-0, and this forum be be ablaze. 😁

New England 15-28 Buffalo

That is fair. But it still doesn't justify people saying things like "the defense is always bad" and "it's like this every year" four games into a season when that is demonstrably untrue. Whether you value regular season statistics or not the Bills used to regularly post very impressive number and performances in the regular season. So getting four gamed into the regular season and claiming the defense being bad is same old, same old, is not justified.

We have to get a younger safety. Rapp is currently 28 years old. He's getting up there in NFL age.

Yes I would though I haven't really thought about practical affordability.

I didn't judge rookies on whether they'll be good or not. I judged the six premium picks at the spot previously. And Phillips started 11 times in 4 years as a Bill. He was a backup.

Shakir - despite having lost Crowder and stuck with the useless McKenzie, Shakir barely sniffed the field as a rookie. They even brought back the Ghost of Cole later in the season. Bernard - was consider a wasted pick immediately following his draft selection and his whole rookie season where barely saw the field. AJE - barely saw the field as a rookie. Dorian Williams - barely saw the field as a rookie before leading the team in tackles in his 2nd season. James Cook - was brought along slow as a rookie and lost playing time to an ancient RB in Gore. And there’s even more - but point is we have brought many day 2 and day 3 rookies along slow many times that resulted in a quality to excellent players. So it’s pretty premature to make a big deal about Landon right now, especially with the very large piece of missing context in your snap counts, which is depth of contributing players ahead of him who have experience in the system on a team already forced to play multiple rookies on the DL while we have several key players out via injury and suspension.

FACTS

That and everything else on it is woke ***t

Washed up? He hasn’t been great but against the Jets he was borderline the best player on defense. That was 2 games ago?

29-20 Bills

Pats 27 Bills 17 and NE fans claim Maye is better than Allen until we destroy them in the rematch

Yes in a perfect world you'd like your 3rd round pick to play some. Even if it's only 10-20% snaps. But in keeping with Bills tradition, I'll tow the company line and simply say "trust the coaches, they know so much more than us". There's obviously a reason they don't feel comfortable enough to throw a jersey at Landon. Hopefully by the end of the season he can get his feet wet on some blowout games. The bigger issue is getting Oliver, Hoecht and Hairston on the field soon.