All Activity

Lmao you're not a serious person. Why won't you take that bet? You claim it's only 1% percent and I directly challenged you and you fold like a house of cards.

That’s the kind of stuff a person starving for attention would say. Kinda like a guy with a Podcast who is trying go get clicks.

He has always struck me as probably mentally ill. Steve Smith too for that matter - that’s a guy who attacked his own teammate with a folding chair during positional meetings.

This could get interesting depending on the content of the text messages he handed over to the FBI. Accessory to murder charges could definitely be on the table.

For your consideration. You may want to sample more of the media before describing those who avail themselves of the media.

He’s getting better, and I think he is an exceptional athlete that if he continues to be driven and develops being on the page with Josh could be an elite weapon that is unique in how he is used. He will eventually get more calls as he learns to sell it better.

Don't play dumb with me dude. Read some news. Your game is getting old. I figured you wouldn't answer in an honest way.

The problem for the Jets is that Buffalo's offense is even better than last year. Buffalo now has two outside receivers with good hands. The run game is still very good and the TE room is arguably even better. Josh has weapons. Lots of them. The Jets defense is good and very instinctive. But the way the Bills spread the ball around it's going to give them problems. I think this is going to be a game where the Jets defense struggles to find answers. And if the Bills jump out to an early lead, I don't think a Justin Fields led offense is going to be able to keep up. The Jets really need to lean on their running game for Justin Fields to be effective as a passer. They can't do that if they are playing from behind.

He just dislikes Allen because he's white. Let's not analyze it more than necessary.

nah, probably just a random attack.

"I support killing people for things they said. What? You want to fire me over things I said??"

If Strong turns into the next 6th round gem, does anyone think Hairston could be a fit at nickel? I wouldn’t mind seeing Taron shift into one of the Safety roles - maybe not mid-season, but next year or so.

Good info, thank you

Not good enough for a nickname.

Can you admit that it's more than feasible Charlie was killed for his political beliefs? If so good day sir and go bills!

So there's a lone wolf, and a lone wolf.

Far enough, carry on

Dumba**

It’s just that athletes aren’t supposed to put other high performing athletes on blast. Last year Steve Smith said Keon Coleman “wasn’t the guy,” okay that was fair… at the time. But to have Allen tearing up the league, a day after he did something no other QB in the league has done in the 4th and to have Draymond criticizing his overall body of work, I think that’s somewhat noteworthy. What’s his agenda? Is it to rage bait or become a villain amongst Bills fans? If so, why? Did the Bills beat his favorite team or something?

The picture of Tyler Robinson's ideology is becoming clearer and clearer, and it is the complete opposite of the left-wing attempt to claim he was actually a "right-wing groyper." That such a gambit was even tried is laughable.

It would prove its political, that why you're avoiding it Sure, one of the sayings is For democracy! Do people commonly describe bugs, robots and aliens as fascists? You don't fight people. Is the movie independence day political?

A man trying to draw clicks

We’re talking about something subjective- whether a team “won a trade”. imo- It all depends on how high a bar the teams sets their bar. When the Bills traded for Diggs- we’re all fairly confidant that their main goal was to help Josh Allen become the best QB he can become. We weren’t a Super Bowl contender yet. Sure, they’d have liked to win a SB too, but supporting Josh was goal #1 imo. They accomplished that. When the Bills drafted Bruce- they were garbage and just adding building blocks for the franchises future was the goal. The packers have their QB and have paid him top dollar. They have some solid weapons under contract for the next few years and a HC they believe is their long term guy. I don’t believe that they gave up those picks and mortgaged that much cap in order to just get better on D. They could’ve signed several players this offseason if they just wanted to improve and would have lots more cap space and multiple draft picks to continue to add to their talent level regarding the bolded- the draft picks and salary cap space wouldn’t be used to get “a” player. They would be used to get several players. The cowboys had a mini dynasty because they hit on those assets acquired for “a” player. if they don’t win a Super Bowl with parsons- then they failed at achieving the goal that they have set for themselves. They have their QB and HC. Once you have them, you have one goal build to win a SB. No one will know what the assets traded away would’ve yielded had they held onto the them- but not winning a SB with him is an L in terms of their build. I get your points though and I don’t think that you’re wrong due to this being subjective. If I were the packers GM- and the team didn’t win a SB with parsons- I’d view that as a failure in my eyes.

It is about the only place I see "liberal" social media posts, so yes