All Activity

There is a reason why X doesn't want you to see this. https://x.com/AntiTrumpCanada/status/1278818127447568390

Draught... Drought...

Funny enough, the NFL Network just replayed the 2015 Playoff Game between the Panthers and Seahawks. Panthers were up 31-0 at the half when I turned it on. Before I knew it, it was 31-24 and Seahawks were still in it but botched their onside kick at the end. It all felt very familiar with McDermott as DC. Some things will NEVER change. This will always be an issue for the Bills with McD. Just hope Josh can cover for McD every time.

And worst location? Short form - family friends from Buffalo. I got in Bills first sport second if that makes sense.

Trump is dismantling America’s intellectual strength and global power. Why? Because a less informed, divided nation is easier to control. By undermining education and truth, he consolidates power. Who benefits? Authoritarians, grifters, and foreign enemies all thriving as America weakens. American greatness, right @Big Blitz

The cannabis laws are, and have always been silly to say the least. As far as migrant labor goes you're 100% correct, both parties have been talking out both sides of their faces for decades. Neither have clean hands.

80% tariff please. They are so selfish.

Nice story. Good on you, Josh. I get it. Famous people get a little tired of being bothered all the time. So we appreciate it when a hero actually appears grateful. There used to be a PGA tournament near where I lived. I attended a couple of them. Here's what impressed me: Greg Norman was reaching the end of his competitive days. He was making a little run for maybe the last time. People were trying to follow him hole to hole. And all it took was a little nod, a little smile, a little wave, a little acknowledgment from him that his fans were there. And he did it. Just the smallest gesture was all he needed to get the love of the crowd. I think Vijay Singh won that year. He wasn't rude in any way, just generally immune to the crowd. No acknowledgment at all. And he basically had no fans. It doesn't take much...

Those greedy people in Lesotho are sending us all these diamonds and denim but not buying anything from us with their $2 per day income! Once we figure this out, next will be the trade deficit with my grocery store. I buy things from them every week but they have never bought anything from me!

2018 when the Rams rolled Todd Gurley who got injured, Malcolm Brown who got injured, John Kelly who got injured, and signed CJ Anderson off his sofa who came in and played awesome convinced me the value of running backs maybe isn't so high above replacement. I feel like the list of RBs who've done well after big contracts is basically Saquon and Adrian Peterson maybe and that's it. Though I'm sure I'm forgetting some. Cook is a good player, but I just don't think at the RB position one player has enough added value over their backup to be worth a lot of the team's salary cap.

Hahaha nice

Same here. I didn't even bother watching all of it.

The larger picture: - WTF are we doing with cannabis. It is readily available - in a store - where most people live. Yet it remains federally controlled. Neither party is willing to get ahead of the issue and just federally legalize/regulate it. This system is absurd. - Growing lettuce, tomatoes, artichokes, cannabis in the USA depends on cheap labor. Cheap labor means immigrants. WTF are we doing in America where we both encourage and discourage immigrant labor. Neither party is willing to face reality. Broken government. Umm, yeah.

Are you even from NY state? Most New Yorkers know this: the state’s economy is deeply tied to Canada whether MAGA likes it or not. Canada is New York’s #1 trading partner, fueling billions in exports like medical instruments, jewelry, aluminum, and business services. Over 80% of NYC’s fuel oil and natural gas imports come from Canada. Canadian tourists are essential to local economies, especially in border regions, like Buffalo Niagara, where their absence is immediately felt. Canada also plays a major role in investment, owning significant portions of NYC real estate and employing thousands across the state and vice versa, with plenty of New Yorkers owning land and property in Canada. And when it comes to energy? New York literally relies on Canadian hydroelectricity to keep the lights on. From trade to tourism to energy, New York doesn’t just benefit from Canada it depends on it. Keep it up, Lenny. Maybe someone’s buying it.

In this spirit of this thread, I wonder who is the worst hero to get fisted by? Probably Andre the Giant.

We got the right Josh. No doubt

He was inspired by the 3-13 season under Gregg Williams and the Van Pelt/Johnson QB debate. He's told this story a 1,000 times.

Yes, they are. I don’t know how well-versed you are in the intricacies of the NBA, but most teams with reasonable ownership operate extremely close to the margins. For the 27-28 Bucks, they will have 4 players under contract in TOTAL and only $12M in cap space. They have to get to a roster of at least 13. Now they have access to mid level exceptions, but it’s basically a slot where they can’t pay anybody. Is it the worst thing in the world? No. Can they work around it? They are going to try. Is having basically a starter’s salary in dead money for the next 5 years objectively very bad for a small market franchise with a marquee superstar? Yes, of course. In a league with the most injuries, and the most to potentially lose with guaranteed contracts, yes I am arguing it would be bad for the NFL at large. It would be bad for the franchises and bad for the players and bad for the fans. Well, yeah. Players are getting asked to take pay cuts because they aren’t performing well enough. Their agents are evaluating the market and saying “no one else is going to pay you more than your requested pay cut, so you are better off taking it.” They aren’t just guessing. Josh Allen hasn’t been asked for a pay cut and won’t be as long as he keeps performing well. Dawson Knox and Von Miller have both taken pay cuts because their production hasn’t justified their salaries and they didn’t want to test their luck on the open market. Von is notably on the couch. Star took his paycut and was out the league. It’s not like they took a pay cut and got screwed out of a years salary because other teams wanted to pay him big bucks. To me, these statements are in conflict. How can teams be more careful in UFA and NOT be hesitant to spend? That seems to go hand in hand. And what players hit UFA? Not the superstars, they get locked up or tagged. It’s the NFL middle and lower classes who are desperately trying to get a $5M deal with $2.5M guaranteed. Guaranteeing contracts at this point in the NFL requires putting an entire guaranteed portion in escrow. We have seen teams like the Bengals and Cowboys be hesitant to pay their SUPERSTARS on time. The Bengals are notoriously cash poor. They have 37% of their cap tied up in QB and WR and it was a struggle to get there. Do you think having to dole out the other at least 63% in guarantees is going to be a problem? Of course it would be. And it would be a problem for the majority of the league. I don’t think folks realize how much money ISN’T guaranteed in the NFL. You can’t flip that switch and do a complete 180 without completely fundamentally altering the market and if you try, you will end up with a whole bunch of teams handing out league minimums left and right. If contracts are fully guaranteed, does a Devin Singletary type player get $5M on the market or league minimum? I think we all know the answer to that. I’m not viewing anyone as a problem. There is no problem. The players are making more money than ever. Threatening a strike to get guaranteed contracts that will ultimately, imo, harm the earnings of the vast majority of NFL players, is just bad business. Make less money with a shortened season and make less money overall is exactly what the NFLPA shouldn’t do.

Hey Gunner, how did you ever get into American football and more specifically the Buffalo Bills?

Science. In this case social science. Within the criminological literature, there has been considerable research devoted to understanding the relationship between homicide and social protection, both within the United States and utilizing cross-national samples. Despite the measure of social welfare or social protection used, the results have shown a consistent significant negative relationship between social welfare and homicide. Within the United States, for example, the significant negative relationship between social protection and homicide has been found across standard metropolitan statistical areas (DeFronzo, 1983; Messner, 1986), cities (Sampson, 1987), and even a specific city over time (Chamlin et al., 2002). Cross-nationally, the research has found significant negative relationships between social protection and homicide utilizing different measures of welfare spending, including a decommodification index (Messner and Rosenfeld, 2006; Savolainen, 2000), percent GDP spent on health care and education (Pratt and Godsey, 2002), welfare spending (Gartner et al., 1990; Pratt and Godsey, 2002), and the amount of social welfare spent in US dollars for each nation (Savage et al., 2008). Regarding their study, Rogers and Pridemore conclude that: One key aspect of social protection is that it is meant to act as a safety net for citizens in times of economic downturn or provide a better living standard for citizens who live below or near the poverty line. Ultimately, the aim of social protection is not to reduce inequality but to address absolute deprivation by raising the standard of living of those who live in poverty to a level that provides the minimum necessities to survive day to day. The moderating effect of social protection found within this paper supports this view. We found that nations with higher levels of social protection not only have lower rates of homicide, but also that the strength of the association between poverty and homicide in these nations is weaker. Therefore,while there are many more direct goals of social protection, one important indirect effect of providing greater social protection is a reduction in violent crime.

I totally get the Sphere hesitance. Vegas is definitely not my bag either. The first time my wife and I went down there for a weekend of Sphere shows, it seemed novel and fun to pair the Dead with Vegas. I envisioned walking down the strip at 2 am with a head full of...something...after the show, Hunter S Thompson style. Of course, the truth is that a lot of Fear and Loathing is about exactly the type of bad vibes, greed, and weirdness that turns me off to Vegas anyway, and we got that in spades. Plus, the Vegas I'd have interest in hanging out in -- the Rat Pack, fancy suits, martinis and showgirls scene -- is long gone. It's all a big, stinky, cigarette smoke-y Disneyland down there. Awful. The SECOND time we went down for Sphere show, we just flew in, hung at the hotel pool, went to Shakedown and the show, and flew out. No Vegas shenanigans. Not a fan of what that city is nowadays. Aaaanyyway....I do think the Sphere is worth seeing once in this life. I'm very much an "eyes closed" guy at Dead shows. To the extent that my eyes are open during a show, they're not usually looking at a video screen. All of that said...I had to see the technological wonder of the Sphere and see what the Dead had in store for it, and I'm glad I experienced it. The first night we experienced it, all my friends and I did was laugh the whole time. It was so astonishing, so unlike anything we'd ever experienced, all we could do was laugh in amused shock and glee. And it WASN'T even due to any substances we took. It was just THAT far out! While I enjoyed the Sphere, I'm absolutely looking forward to the Golden Gate Park shows in August. Outdoors, on a sunny summer day, is where Dead shows are best experienced. Can't wait. Always a hoot!

Technically, yes it's illegal. Weed is still a schedule I drug and illegal at the federal level, as is it's cultivation. The feds haven't bothered enforcing for the most part, but if the DEA felt like it, they could shut down every grow operation from Anchorage to Bangor.

Emil Bove is the textbook definition of a political fixer masquerading as a prosecutor. A former Trump appointee, Bove has shown time and again that he’s more interested in shielding power than delivering justice. Whether it’s targeting political enemies or looking the other way when it benefits his side, his brand of selective prosecution is as blatant as it is corrupt. This isn’t law and order and far from draining the swamp - Bove is neck-deep in it.

This made me think who is the worst hero I met. And it's another cricketer. I met Marcus Trescothick at a game about 10 years ago and he was horrible. I was polite, didn't approach in a place where he could be embarrassed or harrased and he was just rude and dismissive. He is now England's batting coach.

We'll get through it, Bill, hang in there. Btw I was just thinking about a pastry shoppe in Brugge. Delightful croissants and the service impeccable.