All Activity

Is this some sort of 4D chess question? If not, it’s truly dimwitted.

JaMarcus Ingram

The funnel

Then explain to me why it was only Charlie Kirk. A POLITICAL ACTIVIST that was murdered and not another person and not even another shot taken Again if the guy just wanted be famous it would have been a MASS shooting with a much higher body coun

Uhhhhh, Baltimore gave up more points. Argument is invalid.

Hamlet and coolant would've killed Lamar and Mahomes

Term used in gaming What political party should a man belong to that attacks our Democracy?

This thread has so much potential. Don't let us down

Running with “there’s no political angle here” is definitely something you should do. Makes all the sense in the world. Sigh

Strong is the future and White is the past. If it’s close, I give it to the rook and let him continue to grow this season.

Anyone know where to listen to old Bills radio broadcasts? Looking for the Bills Ravens game. Tries Sirius and Tunein and can’t find. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

But using terms like fascists is political.

Listening to T. Johnson interview, it sounds like he'll be ready to go Sunday. Encouraging. Tre White is staying mum about starting in his interview. Have no Idea if he's playing. Excited to see how TJ Sanders looks filling in for Ed.

Good for him.

Wanting notoriety is not political motivation.

It was a calculated tackle as well. He waited until Henry started to extend for the stiff arm and then batted it away to secure the tackle. Heady play

True. The guy could've murdered him for personal reasons. Regardless, Libnuts CELEBRATING has been very telling. I partly blame the news media for giving the impression that most people agree with them when that isn't true. Don't you have people's children/grandchildren to wish death upon?

Hey assh*le - take a look at this:

Tre. If both healthy, I want the guy w experience that’s proven he can perform at a high level in the NFL.

Yeah just flat out disagree with almost all of this. For whatever reason, trading for a player is looked at like some completely different entity than drafting a player or signing a player. It’s all just player acquisition. If you acquire a great player, it’s great. If you acquire a great player for cheaper than you really should, it’s incredible. Now, are there increased expectations associated with the move Green Bay made? Of course there are. But that’s BECAUSE of the caliber of the player they acquired. Because Micah is one of the best EDGE rushers in the league. There’s a league-wide and fan-wide view on first round picks that they are these priceless assets. Which is really bizarro, when even the FIRST ROUND has like barely above a 50% hit rate. The Packers last 4 first rounders were Eric Morgan, Lukas Van Ness, Quay Walker, and Eric Stokes. You couldn’t trade all 4 of those players for a player on the caliber of Parsons, let alone just 2 of them. Furthermore, I completely disagree that a team with an elite defensive talent is at some inherent disadvantage because they have to pay that player a ton of money. Wouldn’t like 29 teams kill to have a defensive player worth $40M+? Isn’t that the point? The point of having cap space and picks is to be able to get and retain great players. I don’t know how this became so backwards to folks. We aren’t at an inherent disadvantage because we are paying Josh. Because Josh is worth every single cent and then some. The argument against making a Micah Parsons move is “let’s hang onto our late first round picks and cap space so we can hope we can get lucky to get a player as good as Micah Parsons.” It’s ass backwards, respectfully.