All Activity

Who? Did Key & Peele make up that name?

nope, they’re fresh out.

Instead of an announcer they should just play a recording of Nick Wright and Chris Collinsworth gagging (assuming they have a gag reflex) on a hotdog shaped object.

It’s possible he’s rage baiting. He said Bills fans can come at him all they want but until Allen wins a SB, he’s right. So by that logic I guess Lamar Jackson is not the guy, Joe Burrow, or any other outstanding QB in the game who hasn’t won it all. There are 53 players on a roster, not 12 like the NBA.

What game? Dude can you guess the political affiliation of the people cheering the death of Charlie Kirk? Gimme a ratio

Draymond, if you’re reading this thread, here is the attention that you so desperately crave!

I know people clown on Collinsworth, but it's really impressive that he can still speak with Mahomes, Kelce and Reid's balls in his mouth at the same time.

If Tre is 100% I’d go with him. I don’t think the Bills, in particular Josh, are going to let the Jets dictate the game. The Bills offense is going to score and force the Jets to pass. I’d rather Tre in that situation. I’m sorry, I just read the title. Start Strong, shutdown the run, get a lead, force them to pass, bring in White.

I never heard of Draymond Greene, if that's his opinion, I don't need to hear anymore from him.

I think it's a drug related thing. Like, dealer here. I may be completely wrong. Wouldn't be the first time

Who is this guy? For what possible reason would give him any attention?!

It has to be rationalized otherwise there would a level of discomfort in their own political party. What was the point the shooter was making in your mind?

He is SUCH a buffoon. He thinks he's some kind of clutch champ because he was along for the ride with truly great players. We wouldn't know his name if he had been on an average team.

Let me rephrase: Does a man deserve an allegiance with any political party when he kills to make a point? Or does this sound more like dictatorship? There is no place for killing in politics. You get that right?

YouTube

Anyone catch Dramond Green's comments about Josh? That guy is such a fool.

Start Strong, and start strong!!!

Didn’t see this posted anywhere and I hope it gets back to Allen. My guess is Draymond hasn’t watched any Buffalo playoff games. Either that, or he’s been hit in the head by one too many balls.

Just trying to understand the first part…do you think it’s not a failure if the Bills don’t come away with a SB in Josh’s career? Or were you talking about just this season?

I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re reading inaccurate reports of what he said. The benefit goes further to assume you never watched the original videos, or that you weren’t paying close attention. If you watched and didn’t get it, you’re on your own and good luck to you. Kirk never said anything close to two of those things (I’ve watched). I’ve not seen the third, but would bet my left leg against a bologna sandwich he didn’t say that one, either. Kirk asked if you want your pilots selected because they’re black or because they’re excellent. He chose excellent, regardless of race or gender. I do, too. I suspect we all do. In the past year, I had open heart surgery that three doctors attended to. One was a white male, one was a black male and one was a Pakistani woman. i’m grateful to all, as Charlie would have been. Stephen King posted on X that Kirk had advocated for the stoning of gay people. King, however, took Kirk's Biblical reference out of context (his words) and presented it as an endorsement of violence. I’ve watched it. Following immediate backlash, King deleted his post and issued an apology on September 12, 2025. King admitted he was wrong and regretted posting without fact-checking. A google search or visit to King’s X account will clear this up for you. I don’t know the brain power reference. I’m happy to let you point me to it. In conclusion, none of us knows everything anyone else ever said. That should be enough to discourage all of us from saying sh***y things about people before we’ve made sure we’re correct. Gorillas flinging poo in a cage aren’t dangerous. That is, until others decide to join in.

Meant to say supposed hideous things, I think most of his positions seemed reasonable for a conservative thinker.

I do not think the trade for Micah Parsons should automatically be defined as a failure if the Packers do not win a Super Bowl. Winning a championship is always the ultimate goal, but football is far more complex than star player equals Super Bowl or bust. A great example is the Bills trading for Stefon Diggs. Buffalo did not win a Super Bowl in his four years there, but that move completely transformed the team. It elevated Josh Allen into an elite quarterback tier, gave Buffalo one of the best wide receivers in the league, and made them a legitimate contender every season. By almost every measure, that was a win of a trade, even without the Lombardi. I would argue the same logic applies here. If Parsons helps elevate Green Bay from good to consistently being among the elite with deep playoff runs and multiple NFC Championship appearances, then that is a success. Where I agree with the criticism is that simply going one and done or consistently finishing 1-1 in the playoffs would not cut it. Consistent high level contention has to be the bar. And we cannot ignore the reality of football. One injury to Jordan Love or other key players could derail a season regardless of how dominant Parsons plays. That does not erase the value of acquiring one of the very best defensive players in the league. We have seen other examples of this across the NFL. When the Vikings traded for Jared Allen in 2008, he immediately turned their defense into a top unit and helped Minnesota become a true contender. They made playoff runs and reached the NFC Championship but never won a Super Bowl. Still, that trade is remembered as a huge success because Allen was a transformative player who made them elite. Another example is the Bears trading for Khalil Mack in 2018. Chicago did not win it all, but Mack turned their defense into one of the most feared in the league and made them an immediate contender. That move was viewed as a win because of how much it elevated the team, even without a ring. The point is that acquiring a generational talent is about consistently giving yourself a real chance. Without Parsons, the Packers are a good team. With him, they are an elite team that everyone has to take seriously. And to me, that is worth it, because so many factors beyond Parsons will ultimately determine whether or not a Super Bowl is won. Perhaps instead of a binary: win/loss it could be best viewed as F - A+ with an A+ being the Super Bowl win and B+ being elite and championship game appearance(s). There is just so many layers to success or not, although I want the Bills to winner a Super Bowl beyond anything else, I also greatly appreciate when they are elite and I appreciate the steps that make them elite and I consider them being elite and with a chance to win it all a level of success beyond fighting to make the playoffs if that.