Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. So Rousseau, Solomon, Lawson, TJ Sanders and Fox at de Sunday?
  3. Small ball Bean. It was reported in Pittsburgh that Slay wanted to be a starter and asked to be released. Was Bean unaware of what was in the freaking papers here!
  4. Lamar will be fine. 9-8 wins that division. The AFC North is the 4 seed and will be decided week 18.
  5. I'm not feeling great about this game without Bosa and Epenesa
  6. I never saw the sun shinin' so bright, never saw things goin' so right Noticing the days hurrying by, when you're in love, my how they fly by Blue days, all of them gone Nothin' but blue skies from now on
  7. Not going to line, after the Bosa and Epinessa news today, I read this as Landon Jackson.
  8. Would a half bottle of cheap tequila do?
  9. Another epic fail by the Southern Avenger
  10. 4-3 front with 3 DTs + 1 DE, with the DT on the strong side. This frees up DEs for pass downs.
  11. You're right. Redundancy to redundancy is the Beane model for building a team. (You have to do that when you favor old guys and draft injury prone young fellas.)
  12. Is Josh Norman available?
  13. But what's another thread about the same thing?
  14. Keep McDermott but find a new GM I mean seriously... "He tried" doesn't cut it. Give McDermott a better roster to work with
  15. It's been mentioned quite a bit in the bitter thread about Darius Slay.
  16. He had a 99 yard game plus the 2 100 yards games like you cited. He has averaged 5.2 ypc or more in 5 of those 6 games. Their running game has been good of late especially for the most pass heavy team.
  17. ANOTHER MEDIA INVENTION No direct quote. No evidence. No wrongdoing. Just partisan operatives feeding rumors to desperate reporters hunting for another scandal that doesn’t exist. Under his authority as commander in chief, the president can blow up pretty much anybody on Earth whom he deems a national security threat. He does not need permission from Congress, the media, or a panel of self-appointed commentators. The missile strikes on drug-running vessels operated by a designated terrorist group are lawful, routine, and predictable. What made the episode explosive was that it enraged exactly the faction that always reacts this way: the political left. Impeachment is the only real consequence available to the administration’s critics, and after two failed efforts, that prospect does not keep President Trump awake at night. Republican control of the House makes even a symbolic attempt unlikely. The central allegation is that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth issued an order to “kill everybody” on the vessel. The Post framed it this way: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation. ‘The order was to kill everybody.’” The headline amplified the accusation: “Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all.” A “spoken directive” means no record. The quote is a paraphrase. Nothing indicates that the source actually heard the Hegseth say those words. This is an anonymous, secondhand characterization of an alleged statement — precisely the sort of raw material the Post loves to inflate into scandal. If these anonymous sources truly believed the secretary issued an illegal order, they were obligated to report it through the chain of command. Their silence speaks louder than any paraphrase. The most plausible explanation is that someone misunderstood — or deliberately distorted — an aggressive statement by Hegseth and nothing more. The United States targets terrorists. The implication behind the Post’s story is that survivors remained after the first strike and that either the secretary or JSOC ordered a second engagement to kill them. No evidence supports that claim. No one outside the direct participants knows what the surveillance picture showed or what tactical conditions existed immediately after the first blast. It is time to put a moratorium on the online laws-of-armed-conflict “experts” who materialize whenever a strike hits a target they sympathize with. They insist that the presence of wounded combatants instantly transforms a hostile platform into a protected site and that destroying the vessel itself becomes a war crime. Even the New York Times — no friend of the administration — punctured that claim: According to five U.S. officials … Mr. Hegseth’s directive did not specifically address what should happen if a first missile failed to accomplish all of those things … and his order was not a response to surveillance footage showing that at least two people on the boat survived the first blast. The mobs demanding Hegseth’s scalp will be disappointed. The voters who supported this administration expected firm action against terrorist cartels and open-ocean drug networks. Another hostile vessel was reduced to an oil slick, and most Americans see that as a success. https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/turns-out-that-hegseths-kill-them-all-line-was-another-media-invention https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/01/us/hegseth-drug-boat-strike-order-venezuela.html
  18. The difference is that I’ll be disappointed if they fail …
  19. I generally agree with what you say here. They're in the same conference with an 80s 49ers type dynasty team. Shyt happens man I still think they can make some noise here
  20. Don't summon the devil, don't call the priest If you need the strength, the conjuring. Anyone got a bucket of KFC to sacrifice?
  21. How about a linebacker like this
  22. It looks like the other GM’s have been clowning him for a few years now too.
  23. Or the secular.modern meaning that I intended https://english-grammar-lessons.com/cast-pearls-before-swine-meaning/ The idiom "cast pearls before swine", which has Biblical origins, paints an image of giving pearls, considered to be rather valuable, to pigs — which are presented as notoriously dirty animals. "I don't know anything about wine! Offering me that expensive Sauvignon Blanc would only be like casting pearls before swine. A beer will do me just fine." "I don't know why you waste your time trying to teach these YouTube addicts about Tolstoy. You're just casting pearls before swine."
  24. With that atrocious defense Cincy won’t be torching anybody
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...