All Activity
- Past hour
-
Training Camp News - Around the League version
DrDawkinstein replied to DrDawkinstein's topic in The Stadium Wall
Denver Broncos, you're our only hope... -
Around the NFL Pre-Season week 1 edition.
Steptide replied to Walking Tall's topic in The Stadium Wall
Why do these pre season broadcasts on nfl network always look so bad? -
Call me a football geek. I don’t care. Malakai Starks with a nice coverage and tackle for the Ravens. I know some wanted him for our team. Indy 3, Poe Birds 0. Lamar taking the night off.
-
Rams extend RB Kyren Williams - 3-year, $33 million
3rdand12 replied to Big Blitz's topic in The Stadium Wall
By Bills design , I just don't think they wanted to use him the way Teams might use a Barkley or Christian Henry etc. He fills a great role in a three headed attack Part of the issue might be is he truly excels in his role and is a key cog for Brady and Josh. If its just about money for Camp Cooks We have the wrong Guy. For one season 😋 Hope he kills it in Buffalo this year and let the future bring what it may Thanks for the nice reply Not in the red zone I bet -
My takeaway after watching that? Thank God we have boring old McDermott.
-
Yeah, in some fairness to McDaniel, he already commented that Hill had work to do to repair relationships. Can't keep harping on it 2-3 weeks later while the guys are trying to work on it.
-
People (fans of other teams) complain about the nfl wanting to make Josh the face of the league. It’s so obvious why.
-
McDaniel is the epitome of the fact that some coaches should just remain coordinators. Not everyone who is a good OC or DC should be a HC. Xs and Os are an only small part of the gig. Not all are built for it. So many examples of this.
-
Keon keeps trying to beat Allen to Highmark lol
Chandler#81 replied to Alphadawg7's topic in The Stadium Wall
I have to see so much more, frankly -
Training Camp News - Around the League version
julian replied to DrDawkinstein's topic in The Stadium Wall
Other than losing Herbert, this is worst case scenario for the Chargers. Plenty of people believe Chargers are a playoff team, we’ll see if they can regroup. -
Trump’s glorious Golden Age of America is here
nedboy7 replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The maga on here are an exceptionally dumb selection. I have actually met intelligent maga. I know its hard to comprehend. -
Josh gifting a pair of tickets to the Ryder Cup https://fb.watch/BkWtE2g1cH/?
-
That was also my point. You can’t compare the two because the numbers are essentially in different scales. The 6th highest was if he had the same salary as Shakir (approx $13.5M), not the $15M he was asking for so you are also correct. Also my unassailable numbers come from a single, lazy AI question / response, so I’m sure yours are better.
-
The Panthers are so desperate for a good quarterback...
Just Jack posted a topic in The Stadium Wall
That they signed a 12 year old...-
- 1
-
-
Ok, so we disagree on what "reasonable" means. I'd think reasonable means fair to both. Seems like you're saying reasonable is when a player takes far less than their value. Which imo is unfair to the player and therefore not reasonable. Reasonable would be something in between. If Cook started at his advertised $15M, and Beane started at his usual $10M (Bernard, Poyer, etc), then reasonable might be $12M-$13M. It very well could be that Beane has his plan, and will not go above $11M. To which I'd say, in that case, Beane was unreasonable. Fine if he wants to stick to his plan, but dont blame Cook like he's the (only) unreasonable one. But we're just guessing. eta: I'd say Rousseau and Benford's deals were "reasonable". --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rea·son·a·ble /ˈrēzənəb(ə)l,ˈrēznəb(ə)l/ adjective adjective: reasonable 1. (of a person) having sound judgment; fair and sensible. 2. as much as is appropriate or fair; moderate.
-
I can't see them making the playoffs and I don't think McDaniels or the FO survive this offseason.
-
Their situations aren't even slightly related. Cook wants to be paid like a top 3 running back. Shakir's contract made him the 27th highest paid receiver. Cook wants 15 million. That would make him tied for 3rd highest, not 6th. He'd be on par with Henry. And Shakir is the 27th highest paid receiver.
-
Cook proved without a doubt he WANTS to be here when he risked his contract, his future, etc and showed up to camp and practiced despite not having a deal done yet. If he didn't want to be here, he wouldn't have risked that injury and played hard ball from the get go or asked for a trade. He was showing his commitment to be here, and it wasn't unnoticed by the team and FO. This idea guys don't want to be here because they are trying to get the best deal they can for their family is always wild to me. The NFL FO can bail on his contract if they want, they are not fully guaranteed. He is a RB that even if he is the best at his position, he will earn considerably less than other great players at other positions over their careers because they make less and generally wear down faster. In fact man teams run them into the ground now and draft a younger one instead of paying them. Sorry, but this is a short sided take IMO
-
Notable Nexflix / Amazon / Premium Channel Series & Movies
Rockpile233 replied to Heitz's topic in Off the Wall
Yes, love a weird leaning horror movie. Have you checked out “Companion” by the same director? Very watchable movie. I’m also looking forward to Weapons. -
This guy is the most awkward person I have ever seen land a gig as a HC. Can you imagine being a player having to listen to this guy all of the time? I could barely make it through the 5 minute segment.
-
No disrespect, but you just echoed what I said when I said reasonable. What Beane deems is reasonable based on how he percieves his value, the value of the position, and the cap plans with other contracts and spending moving forward. I didn't say it was our definition of reasonable. As I siad, if the contract Cook was seeking was reasonable (to Beane) he would be signed. The facts are, Cook is asking for more money than Beane was looking to pay - Shakir was not - so Shakir signed, Cook not signed. This isn't as complicated as its getting made out to be. Beane is clearly going to have to pay Cook more than he wants - but that amount still needs to be reasonable enough for him to go up in his price and ge the deal done - had they already gotten there the deal would already be signed. This convo started off someone complaining we paid Shakir already and not Cook. The massive difference is that Shakirs deal was in line with what Beane felt was good for the team - so its done. If Shakir and his team sat back and demanded $20M per year (like many were worried would happen around here), I assure you that would not have been a reasonable deal for Beane and Shakir wouldn't have a new deal either.
-
Trump’s glorious Golden Age of America is here
nedboy7 replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
MAGA loves other people’s misery.