All Activity
- Past hour
-
Quarterback Career Comparison Allen vs Lamar
bigduke6 replied to BillytheKid's topic in The Stadium Wall
i like Lamar, seems like a genuine good dood, legit great player. its JA17 all day every day for me, wouldnt swap any other QB in the league for Josh, even Kermit. -
Quarterback Career Comparison Allen vs Lamar
The Jokeman replied to BillytheKid's topic in The Stadium Wall
Oh I agree as a Bills and Allen fan. -
TJ Watt signs extension with the Stillers
Chicken Boo replied to RoscoeParrish's topic in The Stadium Wall
Neither he nor Micah's contracts will match their impact. -
Reminder to low info morons - any Musk association with Epstein and a logical conclusion Musk knew Trump was involved in some sordid way would destroy Musk’s career. He helped a pedo get elected. I trust the guy that’s been right about everything.
-
Landon Jackson, a defensive end for the Arkansas Razorbacks, suffered a neck injury during a game against Missouri on November 30, 2024. He was carted off the field and taken to the hospital, but was later released and reported to be "doing well". The injury was initially concerning, but it was later clarified that the hospitalization was precautionary due to neck pain. Jackson was able to move his extremities and communicate with medical staff.
-
Does Thurman Thomas Get His Due? (Offseason rehash topic)
SoonerBillsFan replied to folz's topic in The Stadium Wall
So many great backs. To me the GOAT is Jim Brown. Then it's Barry Sanders hands down. Thurman is one of the greatest all around backs to play the game. -
Stadium Construction Discussion (No PSL/Seat selection posts)
UConn James replied to JÂy RÛßeÒ's topic in The Stadium Wall
Oops. 😬 -
Where does Khalil Shakir rank in terms of NFL WRs?
Mikie2times replied to Kirby Jackson's topic in The Stadium Wall
They had arguable the greatest offense of all time with Moss that year. If a few things happen differently in one game they’re considered the greatest team in sports history. I’m sure they would have been just fine with a star WR long term if they went that route. Brady didn’t need it, that is what they proved. Ball was always going to an open player at light speed. They didn’t need a guy like Moss to make it work, but it would have been just fine either way. That one year it produced results like we have never seen before or since. -
Why does MAGA protect pedos?
Homelander replied to SectionC3's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:
Homelander replied to Deranged Rhino's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
Where does Khalil Shakir rank in terms of NFL WRs?
BullBuchanan replied to Kirby Jackson's topic in The Stadium Wall
What is a "slot offense"? My argument was quite simple and direct. For the New England Patriots, Julian Edelman was a more valuable player than Randy Moss despite Moss being the far more traditionally talented and gifted receiver. They realized that controlling the ball through a horizontal game, like they did in the early years with Branch, Givens, Patten was a more reliable way to win than by having a downfield attack. After they dumped Moss, they made no attempts to replace him. Instead they targeted guys like Danny Amendola and Chris Hogan, and they stacked trophies. Just watch the games, man. It's all on the tape. -
Does Thurman Thomas Get His Due? (Offseason rehash topic)
Augie replied to folz's topic in The Stadium Wall
He could read and pick up a blitz like and make it look beautiful in some way. He made it look that easy sometimes, like an art form. -
meh. either Von was dogging it last season, or hes just a guy now. whatever.
-
Where does Khalil Shakir rank in terms of NFL WRs?
3rdand12 replied to Kirby Jackson's topic in The Stadium Wall
I felt it could go the other way. Bring an X receiver to clear out a safety or two ( Not Keon btw but some respected speed ) and his targets might/should go down but his yards and YAC might well go up. That would be a good thing. Less targets but better targets , not worse -
PLEASE TALK ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN EPSTEIN. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.