Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said:

I'm with you. Clearly, he's on everyone's sh*tlist - coaches, players, fans - at the moment, but an injury or two and we will end up desperately needing something from him. I don't have much faith right now, but I'm going to cross my fingers and hope for the best until we are able to move him in the offseason.

 

Or for him to show that he has the ability to function as a member of the offense, and not expect to be the focal point of every game.  

Posted
1 hour ago, BearNorth said:

In what world would a person who you paid a $4.1 million signing bonus and is making a $1.25 million dollar annual salary blow off a meeting with the boss and still have a job. I've seen people let go making a lot less for far less unprofessional reasons.

For some players football is a means to an end. Handing someone a few million dollars gives them opportunities they never had. 
 

obviously it’s myopic on their part to not put full effort into getting a second contract but if they don’t truly love the game 🤷‍♂️

Posted
37 minutes ago, davefan66 said:


There is always more to the story…  not sure it’s much more than what we see.

 

I would hope if a player is detrimental to a successful offense, he’d be on the bench.  I believe yesterday showed how good we are without him and have no issue benching him moving forward.

 

If all a dude can do is “contested catches”, then he needs to be the 5th receiver used in the endzone or spread plays every so often. Honestly don’t believe he’s that good at contested catches anyways.


He gets bodied too easily, I would rather give a contested catch to Shavers.

  • Agree 3
Posted

I wonder if any of the veteran receivers have tried to take him in under their wings?  Seems like an immature, disorganized mess right now in need of a stern mentor type that can keep him in line.  Kind of a bummer if we don't have anyone in his position group keeping an eye on him.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:


He gets bodied too easily, I would rather give a contested catch to Shavers.


He has been.  I’d say it’s a lack of effort.

Posted
3 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Amazing stat I heard regarding Coleman.

 

Last year without Coleman after the wrist injury, we scored.....

30, 30, 35 and 42.  

This year....44.

 

I mean I sense a pattern....do youse guys?

 


also this year WITH Coleman… 41, 30, 31, 31, 40, 30

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, iccrewman112 said:


also this year WITH Coleman… 41, 30, 31, 31, 40, 30

 

 

It just seemed easier yesterday.  Open receivers

Posted
1 hour ago, iccrewman112 said:


also this year WITH Coleman… 41, 30, 31, 31, 40, 30

 

 

 

Yes true but those games were dominated by our rushing offense.  Our passing offense has been pretty bad most of the year.  

They were able to open it up more because they aren't completely limited outside.

Posted
3 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:


He gets bodied too easily, I would rather give a contested catch to Shavers.

Mack Hollins thinks that players drafted before the 5th round are soft.  Macks theory plays out Keon vs Shavers

Shavers has fought, and fought, and fought for a roster spot.  He’s living his dream, and he will continue to fight and fight…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...