Jags listening to trade calls for Brian Thomas

[GrimboG]

33 minutes ago, Ayjent said:

A 2nd is a high price, but probably gets it done easily.  A 3rd and you have to throw in a decent player with the likelihood that the Bills will be in the later part of round 3?  I don't like the idea of trading many pieces but Samuel or Moore would make sense on the offensive side.  I think there is a chemistry issue with Lawrence.  Maybe its not the right move, but the talent is there and the price is right.  It will take time getting on the same page with Josh if a trade is made, but I can definitely see this working out for the Bills.

 

Hopefully this is in the works, but I won't hold my breath.  

I don't think the Jags are accepting your offers. I'd gladly do either of those from a Bills perspective, bite your hand off! 

[Ayjent]

14 minutes ago, GrimboG said:

I don't think the Jags are accepting your offers. I'd gladly do either of those from a Bills perspective, bite your hand off! 

Did you drink some of the Jags stadium pool water?  

[Buffalo03]

1 hour ago, Andrew Son said:

"Yet another year" like last years MVP season!  LOL

Did he really have that great of a receiving core last season? Are you expecting 2 straight MVP seasons with what he has?

[Buffalo716]

6 hours ago, colin said:

 

wrong, they are required to do something, and you do do it every single time.

 

 

I just wanted to argue, carry on.

I have received like 10 thumbs Downs in this thread and I did it once because I wanted to hear his opinion

 

Have a nice day

Edited Tuesday at 08:02 PM by Buffalo716

[colin]

1 hour ago, Buffalo716 said:

I have received like 10 thumbs Downs in this thread and I did it once because I wanted to hear his opinion

 

Have a nice day

 

lol, could you not tell i was making a joke?

[Buffalo716]

Just now, colin said:

 

lol, could you not tell i was making a joke?

 

Sarcasm is sometimes tough through the internet buddy , especially since I've been hit in the head a thousand times

 

Go bills I love this place and everybody here

Edited Tuesday at 08:29 PM by Buffalo716

[Starr Almighty]

10 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

The quote is “no plans.”  That is different from “not.”

The Jacksonville Jaguars are not going to trade receiver Brian Thomas

 

are you mssing this line? with the word not in it?

[PayDaBill$]

I have no idea if he’s on the block or not but either way a coach or GM is never going to say “yes” to that question when asked by the media. Never!

Edited yesterday at 12:14 AM by PayDaBill$

[SectionC3]

13 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said:

The Jacksonville Jaguars are not going to trade receiver Brian Thomas

 

are you mssing this line? with the word not in it?

My reading comprehension is pretty good.  You should read the HC’s quote.  There is a difference between “not” and “no plans.” 

[Starr Almighty]

17 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

My reading comprehension is pretty good.  You should read the HC’s quote.  There is a difference between “not” and “no plans.” 

You keep saying that they said "no plans" when the article says the word "NOT" in it. That's what I keep trying to point out 

[BADOLBILZ]

On 10/28/2025 at 12:49 AM, Mikie2times said:

You should stop calling people out that thumbs down your posts. Sometimes people might not agree but they don’t want to get into a length discussion. Nor should they be required to do so. 

 

When you respond negatively to a take you have involved yourself in a discussion whether you like it or not.   If you really don't want to discuss it.......then you don't have to respond to being called out.   Fact.   If it's going to hurt your feelings to be called out then don't involve yourself to begin with.   This should be common sense.  I know  more people grow up without fathers nowadays but c'mon.  You shouldn't need a slap in the head to figure this dynamic out. 

[SectionC3]

15 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said:

You keep saying that they said "no plans" when the article says the word "NOT" in it. That's what I keep trying to point out 

The quote is what it is.  I read “no plans.”

[Mikie2times]

24 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

When you respond negatively to a take you have involved yourself in a discussion whether you like it or not.   If you really don't want to discuss it.......then you don't have to respond to being called out.   Fact.   If it's going to hurt your feelings to be called out then don't involve yourself to begin with.   This should be common sense.  I know  more people grow up without fathers nowadays but c'mon.  You shouldn't need a slap in the head to figure this dynamic out. 

Awful take. Can you imagine this place if every poster had skin so thin they had to call out somebody who gave them a thumbs down. If I had to guess it's probably pretty easy to see your veins. 

[Alphadawg7]

I would trade for BTJ in a heartbeat, even if he isn't the guy he was last year and somewhere between that guy and the guy this year, the mere threat of him has value to this team from the outside position.  

 

BUT - The trade from the outside looking in makes no sense to the Jags.  They still have 2 1/2 years on his rookie deal and an optional year after that.  They just traded a bounty to get Hunter to pair with him, they have very little in the WR behind those 2, and Hunter isn't even a full time WR.  Not to mention the gazillion dollar over pay to fake TD Jesus where they need to keep as many weapons for him to try and salvage that awful contract they gave him.

 

Now the HC is saying they aren't trading him (yes I know the whole semantics game being played here to keep "hope" alive), and he last said that emphatically about Eitenne when everyone was certain he was getting traded in the preseason and they did not trade just like they said.  Instead they traded Tank.  

 

Right now, I think the reality is BTJ is not being traded, and even though I (like many) were all in on trying to get him if he was "available", the reality is most of these stories are total BS from the get go.  Someone gets word one team called about a guy, even if rebuffed, now the story is the team is "fielding calls for X player".  It happens all the time, and its almost always nonsense or exaggerated to get clicks.

 

IMHO - Not only is he not coming here, he isn't going anywhere.  

 

DISCLAIMER:  If he does end up getting traded anyway and it doesn't atleast come out that we tried to get in on him, then Benae will have to answer for that as he is a no brainer go and get guy for what this team lacks from all angles - type of player, position, skill set, and contract is a rookie deal.  

[BADOLBILZ]

2 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

Awful take. Can you imagine this place if every poster had skin so thin they had to call out somebody who gave them a thumbs down. If I had to guess it's probably pretty easy to see your veins. 

 

Then give it a thumbs down.   Why call poor innocent me out like that?  😉

 

Maybe you don't understand the difference between a thumbs down and a disagree.   There is a reason they are different.  The down is a less civil and subsequently elevating version of disagreeing.   And you don't think that even involves you in the discussion?   You're wrong.  Obviously.   Common sense.  It was an awful take on your part hence the thumbs down.