SCBills Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 8 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Makes me sad that this is where we are with our political leaders but that’s incredible! I’ll give Newsom some credit for trying with his “press office” account, but the left can’t meme is a real thing. JD Vance doesn’t care if you post memes about him. He reposts them and laughs. The reason it works for MAGA, is the Dems fall for it everytime. Case in point, the sombrero memeing. Hakeem Jeffries crying racism and saying he’s not scared .. ok.. now they’re just going to meme you more. 3
BillsFanNC Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 minute ago, SCBills said: I’ll give Newsom some credit for trying with his “press office” account, but the left can’t meme is a real thing. JD Vance doesn’t care if you post memes about him. He reposts them and laughs. The reason it works for MAGA, is the Dems fall for it everytime. Case in point, the sombrero memeing. Hakeem Jeffries crying racism and saying he’s not scared .. ok.. now they’re just going to meme you more. Trump putting out the memes comports with his entire public persona for four decades. In other words, like the tactic or not, it's authentic. When the left tries to respond in kind it's just plain cringe.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 4 hours ago, sherpa said: They form entities that are not taxed at those rates and channel as much money into those as they can. Perfectly legal. It needn't be.
LDD Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 13 minutes ago, SCBills said: I’ll give Newsom some credit for trying with his “press office” account, but the left can’t meme is a real thing. JD Vance doesn’t care if you post memes about him. He reposts them and laughs. The reason it works for MAGA, is the Dems fall for it everytime. Case in point, the sombrero memeing. Hakeem Jeffries crying racism and saying he’s not scared .. ok.. now they’re just going to meme you more. ...so, I guess I would raise the question of how is anyone supposed to have respect for the office of the presidency of the United States when that is the type of behavior displayed? Most of us have been raised to believe that there are standards of decorum, especially in the workplace and especially in instances of leadership and duty. Most of us are held to those standards. 2
JDHillFan Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 6 minutes ago, LDD said: ...so, I guess I would raise the question of how is anyone supposed to have respect for the office of the presidency of the United States when that is the type of behavior displayed? Most of us have been raised to believe that there are standards of decorum, especially in the workplace and especially in instances of leadership and duty. Most of us are held to those standards. I absolutely agree. Decorum would be nice. Sadly, the horse seems to have permanently left the barn. 1 1
SectionC3 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 12 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I absolutely agree. Decorum would be nice. Sadly, the horse seems to have permanently left the barn. Not the president, anus man, but you know that.
nedboy7 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 16 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I absolutely agree. Decorum would be nice. Sadly, the horse seems to have permanently left the barn. ⬆️ 🤣 JDDunce in da house!!
JDHillFan Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Not the president, anus man, but you know that. Here’s what LDD said: “there are standards of decorum, especially in the workplace and especially in instances of leadership” Pretty sure speaker of the house is a leadership role. I would like to say that you know that and that you know that’s what LDD stated, but that would be giving you too much credit. You are more emotional than asstute in your posting. Do you see what I did there with astute? That was just for you. You’re welcome. 2 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: ⬆️ 🤣 JDDunce in da house!! Good post 2
LDD Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 40 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I absolutely agree. Decorum would be nice. Sadly, the horse seems to have permanently left the barn. I agree, that was childish. That's a good example, but it's one in a sea of childish behaviors now...unfortunately. I think the atrocious, bi-partisan, behavior at the Ryder Cup is a symptom of the incessant childishness that we see from those in charge, no matter the party. Edited 19 hours ago by LDD
JDHillFan Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, LDD said: I agree, that was childish. That's a good example, but it's one in a sea of childish behaviors now...unfortunately. We are in agreement. It’s an embarrassment to our country. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Democrats act like children, but trump needs to be the bigger man. Sure.
B-Man Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago DOE Takes a Scalpel to 'Nearly $8B' in Blue States' Green Energy Waste During Schumer Shutdown by Becca Lower The Democrats appear to have miscalculated on triggering a government shutdown by a vast measure, which we started to see in motion mere hours after the Schumer Shutdown began on Oct. 1. President Trump signaled in a Truth Social post he was eager to sit down with OMB head Vought in the afternoon, to dig into what extraneous government spending might get cut--especially anything prized by the Democrats. Anyway, sure enough, on Wednesday evening, the Energy Department chimed in, sharing in a press release posted on X that after a review that started in May, they had "determined that these projects did not adequately advance the nation’s energy needs, were not economically viable, and would not provide a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars." Here are the offices and agencies that were awarded the money: Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Office of Grid Deployment (GDO) Office of Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains (MESC) Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) and Fossil Energy (FE). Long story short, the DOE said to the green energy scammers: Not on our watch. https://redstate.com/beccalower/2025/10/02/ombs-vought-takes-a-scalpel-to-nearly-8b-in-blue-states-green-energy-waste-during-schumer-shutdown-n2194674 1
SectionC3 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said: Here’s what LDD said: “there are standards of decorum, especially in the workplace and especially in instances of leadership” Pretty sure speaker of the house is a leadership role. I would like to say that you know that and that you know that’s what LDD stated, but that would be giving you too much credit. You are more emotional than asstute in your posting. Do you see what I did there with astute? That was just for you. You’re welcome. Good post Wrong again, anus man. You omitted the part of the quote in prior poster spoke specifically of the office of the president of the United States. This is what happens when you dwell more on your enthusiasm for the sphincter than on reading comprehension.
sherpa Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: It needn't be. So are you suggesting we change the tax law? Screw around with this issue and see the consequences. 3 hours ago, SectionC3 said: So, point is, we generated more tax revenue from the wealthy during all of those presidencies, nobody stopped working, and working class people shouldered less of the tax load. I'm not sure your premise is correct. I am sure that when you get to a certain level of tax on income, you discourage work and productivity, and capital moves elsewhere. I used to know the figure but I believe it's less than 40%. The bottom line is always the same though. We have no revenue problem. We have a spending problem, and there is no valid argument. 1
SectionC3 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 6 minutes ago, sherpa said: So are you suggesting we change the tax law? Screw around with this issue and see the consequences. I'm not sure your premise is correct. I am sure that when you get to a certain level of tax on income, you discourage work and productivity, and capital moves elsewhere. I used to know the figure but I believe it's less than 40%. The bottom line is always the same though. We have no revenue problem. We have a spending problem, and there is no valid argument. Prove me wrong.
Recommended Posts