Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

McDermott has had a length of 6" thick anchor chain on him since he walked in the door.

I get it, running the ball anywhere near him is a waste of a down and his contain rush is almost always correct.

But for gawd's sake coach, cut the young man loose sometimes. 

Not just because he can be a problem when he's allowed to attack the backfield, but it also forces blockers away from blitzers that are usually being picked up.

This is not Rousseau's fault; he's doing what he's being coached to do on too many downs.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
22 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

He was invisible these three games but the season is long. 

 

He's not invisible at all, imo.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Victory Formation said:

I’m not worried about him yet. He has earned the benefit of the doubt for now.

Has he?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

McDermott has had a length of 6" thick anchor chain on him since he walked in the door.

I get it, running the ball anywhere near him is a waste of a down and his contain rush is almost always correct.

But for gawd's sake coach, cut the young man loose sometimes. 

Not just because he can be a problem when he's allowed to attack the backfield, but it also forces blockers away from blitzers that are usually being picked up.

This is not Rousseau's fault; he's doing what he's being coached to do on too many downs.

 

I have a hard time believing this is the whole truth. Surely there's some execution that's not happening?

  • Agree 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, NickelCity said:

 

I have a hard time believing this is the whole truth. Surely there's some execution that's not happening?

 

Watch him.

It's not like he's getting blocked or pushed around; he's setting the edge or rushing contain on most of his snaps.

He's nto getting opportunities to make plays that people see (i.e sacks or tfls) because he's rarely being allowed to actually attack the backfield.

This is what McDermott wants from him because he wants his defense responsible to a fault and Rousseau is also really good at it.

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
20 minutes ago, Victory Formation said:

We were missing Ed Oliver today. It would have been a different outcome with him in the game..

And Milano.  Missing a huge piece at the first 2 levels of D does hurt.

  • Agree 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Victory Formation said:

We were missing Ed Oliver today. It would have been a different outcome with him in the game..


I realize Ed was missing but so was Rousseau. Only one of those two were hurt. You expect players making 20 Million or so a year to step up and make a play here or there regardless of the circumstances.

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Walking Tall said:


I realize Ed was missing but so was Rousseau. Only one of those two were hurt. You expect players making 20 Million or so a year to step up and make a play here or there regardless of the circumstances.

There isn’t enough of a pattern there for me to be worried.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...