Niagara Bill Posted August 17 Posted August 17 13 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Makes you wonder why everyone has gerrymander fever running so hot. What’s the point? Have you always been like this or is it age related? Not always, but this is the first time we/all of us/ US, Canada, Europe, have faced with leadership that believes in Autarcy in almost 100 years. Historically only 2 countries have believed in this. North Korea a closed economy, self sufficient and Germany in 1930. The problem with Autarcy is a self sufficient economy needs a customer. I believe project 25 believes in this, North America Autarcy, with trump believing he will be in controll. To do this, he needs Canada, he needs real enemies, he needs a machine to use up the production...to make America great again he will need a military to eat up production. 1
JDHillFan Posted August 17 Posted August 17 29 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said: Not always, but this is the first time we/all of us/ US, Canada, Europe, have faced with leadership that believes in Autarcy in almost 100 years. Historically only 2 countries have believed in this. North Korea a closed economy, self sufficient and Germany in 1930. The problem with Autarcy is a self sufficient economy needs a customer. I believe project 25 believes in this, North America Autarcy, with trump believing he will be in controll. To do this, he needs Canada, he needs real enemies, he needs a machine to use up the production...to make America great again he will need a military to eat up production. First time? The horrific misspelling of autocracy aside, are you discounting the years 2016-2020? When will the military eating up production begin? Seems like it should have started already. 1
Wolfgang Posted August 17 Posted August 17 36 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said: Not always, but this is the first time we/all of us/ US, Canada, Europe, have faced with leadership that believes in Autarcy in almost 100 years. Historically only 2 countries have believed in this. North Korea a closed economy, self sufficient and Germany in 1930. The problem with Autarcy is a self sufficient economy needs a customer. I believe project 25 believes in this, North America Autarcy, with trump believing he will be in controll. To do this, he needs Canada, he needs real enemies, he needs a machine to use up the production...to make America great again he will need a military to eat up production.
Niagara Bill Posted August 17 Posted August 17 15 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: First time? The horrific misspelling of autocracy aside, are you discounting the years 2016-2020? When will the military eating up production begin? Seems like it should have started already.
T master Posted August 17 Posted August 17 On 8/16/2025 at 2:33 AM, Big Blitz said: LFG!!!! HEY Roundy & Homelander you read this ? This is from some one that lives it every day sounds like a big waste of funds for sure doesn't it ? Go figure a POTUS that 1 does something he said he would do in the election & 2 a POTUS actually doing something for the people of the country he was elected to lead FREAKIN AMAZING !!!! 2
Figster Posted August 17 Posted August 17 (edited) On 8/16/2025 at 11:53 AM, LeviF said: What if I were to tell you we could keep the guns, get rid of something else, and have far fewer violent crimes I wanted to go back to this, Numbers indicate a black man is almost 20 times more likely to commit a violent crime then a white man. As a law enforcement officer how does racial profiling when searching for perps in violent crimes not occur? I appreciate your candor in this discussion. Also, from your perspective considering removing blacks from society is not an option. Do you have any thoughts on how the disparaging number of violent crime within this ethnic group can be lowered? Is gang violence driving the numbers up? Blacks killing Blacks to survive on the streets? Can the National Guard help lower the numbers? Thanks again Levi for sharing your thoughts from a law enforcement perspective. Edited August 17 by Figster
LeviF Posted August 17 Posted August 17 28 minutes ago, Figster said: I wanted to go back to this, Numbers indicate a black man is almost 20 times more likely to commit a violent crime then a white man. As a law enforcement officer how does racial profiling when searching for perps in violent crimes not occur? I appreciate your candor in this discussion. Also, from your perspective considering removing blacks from society is not an option do you have any thoughts on how the disparaging number of violent crime within this ethnic group can be lowered? Is gang violence driving the numbers up? Blacks killing Blacks to survive on the streets? Can the National Guard help lower the numbers? Thanks again Levi for sharing your thoughts from a law enforcement perspective. 1. Most violent crime is intra-racial, meaning in the case of homicides that if the victim is black, all else being equal, the perpetrator is more likely to be black. In the age of mass surveillance and the widespread use of cameras on even people’s domiciles it’s rare that we have to jump to any conclusions right away. Knocking on doors gives us more knowledge every year. 2. Strict enforcement of all crime in violent crime hotspots is most likely to result in steep drops in crime. We’ve seen it happen before, and following the summer of 2020 we saw the effect that the opposite approach had: not just more homicides but also more fatal traffic accidents among blacks in particular. 3. Gang violence is a large contributor to inner city violent crime in particular. In my area there were recently a lot of OG shot callers and soldiers let out of prison after serving their time (10 year mins) for federal beefs. We subsequently saw a spike in all crimes. 4. I’m bearish on using soldiers to police generally. There are a number of reasons for this but the number of bad cops out there that served in the military is high up on the list. 1 1 1
T master Posted August 17 Posted August 17 (edited) 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Bidenites .... These are all just people that do not want to have any laws I would be willing to bet most of them don't believe in anything that the Bible has to say either because it has the basic rules of being a considerate human being this world has gone straight to hell ., These too are the ones that want open borders, sanctuary cities, free health care, and as many entitlements they can get and they are probably part of the everybody gets a trophy comity !! Edited August 17 by T master 1
Figster Posted August 17 Posted August 17 (edited) 1 hour ago, LeviF said: 1. Most violent crime is intra-racial, meaning in the case of homicides that if the victim is black, all else being equal, the perpetrator is more likely to be black. In the age of mass surveillance and the widespread use of cameras on even people’s domiciles it’s rare that we have to jump to any conclusions right away. Knocking on doors gives us more knowledge every year. 2. Strict enforcement of all crime in violent crime hotspots is most likely to result in steep drops in crime. We’ve seen it happen before, and following the summer of 2020 we saw the effect that the opposite approach had: not just more homicides but also more fatal traffic accidents among blacks in particular. 3. Gang violence is a large contributor to inner city violent crime in particular. In my area there were recently a lot of OG shot callers and soldiers let out of prison after serving their time (10 year mins) for federal beefs. We subsequently saw a spike in all crimes. 4. I’m bearish on using soldiers to police generally. There are a number of reasons for this but the number of bad cops out there that served in the military is high up on the list. I can see where soldiers policing might add another layer of corruption. The National Guard should be placed in a guard and assist only capacity working under the Police Departments jurisdiction IMO. On a side note: Racial distribution of Washington population: 39.07% are white, 43.26% are Black or African American, 0.30% are American Indian and Alaska Native, 4.09% are Asian, 0.06% are Native Hawaiian. Edited August 17 by Figster
LeviF Posted August 17 Posted August 17 1 hour ago, Figster said: I can see where soldiers policing might add another layer of corruption. The National Guard should be placed in a guard and assist only capacity working under the Police Departments jurisdiction IMO. On a side note: Racial distribution of Washington population: 39.07% are white, 43.26% are Black or African American, 0.30% are American Indian and Alaska Native, 4.09% are Asian, 0.06% are Native Hawaiian. When you look at the “crime in red states” slop that leftists often post for longer than ten seconds you end up realizing that the disparity is almost all due to urban areas with large black populations. 1 1
JFKjr Posted August 17 Posted August 17 On 8/16/2025 at 6:34 PM, Niagara Bill said: Me thinks you are wrong but hope you right US citizens have no control over trump... Now Trump controls your position, project 2025 is in charge, remember deep state, it wasn't dems. We're halfway there!
Wacka Posted August 17 Posted August 17 Whoa, we're halfway there Whoa-oh, living on a prayer Take my hand, we'll make it I swear Whoa-oh, living on a prayer, living on a prayer 1
ComradeKayAdams Posted August 18 Posted August 18 On 8/16/2025 at 1:40 PM, All_Pro_Bills said: Switzerland has a higher rate of gun ownership but few homicides. And in major US cities with crime issues guns are already illegal. In American cities most crimes are related to "Ghetto" behavior and culture. Switzerland also has gun control laws that most Second Amendment enthusiasts would find onerous, if not downright tyrannical. A multitude of factors (culture, socioeconomic mobility, accessibility of mental health resources, etc.) beyond gun regulations and police force budgets, of course, explain why violent crime levels are much lower in Europe than in the United States. Rhetorical question for MAGA: if the presence of military forces is so effective at reducing crime, why haven’t previous American presidents tried this ingenious method of combating crime?? Rhetorical answer: because the history books are filled with lessons on the dangers of allowing standing armies to preside in urban civilian settings. Much of our U.S. Bill of Rights was inspired by these historical lessons! Foucault’s imperial boomerang theory, as applied to WW2 fascism and apropos to Trump Redux, only reinforces these lessons that our Founding Fathers understood well in 1789. What I actually find most alarming among MAGA, more so than their cultish disregard for Constitutional principles, is their emergent dehumanizing language toward homeless people. Low empathy and low intelligence are dual dangerous ingredients used in the concoction of creeping fascism. So wakey-wakey, MAGA a-hole dullards!! If you normalize authoritarian tactics, that tyrannical boomerang is coming back your way. Oh, Empress AOC will make sure of it… 1 1 1
Wolfgang Posted August 18 Posted August 18 13 minutes ago, ComradeKayAdams said: Switzerland also has gun control laws that most Second Amendment enthusiasts would find onerous, if not downright tyrannical. A multitude of factors (culture, socioeconomic mobility, accessibility of mental health resources, etc.) beyond gun regulations and police force budgets, of course, explain why violent crime levels are much lower in Europe than in the United States. Rhetorical question for MAGA: if the presence of military forces is so effective at reducing crime, why haven’t previous American presidents tried this ingenious method of combating crime?? Rhetorical answer: because the history books are filled with lessons on the dangers of allowing standing armies to preside in urban civilian settings. Much of our U.S. Bill of Rights was inspired by these historical lessons! Foucault’s imperial boomerang theory, as applied to WW2 fascism and apropos to Trump Redux, only reinforces these lessons that our Founding Fathers understood well in 1789. What I actually find most alarming among MAGA, more so than their cultish disregard for Constitutional principles, is their emergent dehumanizing language toward homeless people. Low empathy and low intelligence are dual dangerous ingredients used in the concoction of creeping fascism. So wakey-wakey, MAGA a-hole dullards!! If you normalize authoritarian tactics, that tyrannical boomerang is coming back your way. Oh, Empress AOC will make sure of it…
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 18 Posted August 18 9 hours ago, ComradeKayAdams said: Switzerland also has gun control laws that most Second Amendment enthusiasts would find onerous, if not downright tyrannical. A multitude of factors (culture, socioeconomic mobility, accessibility of mental health resources, etc.) beyond gun regulations and police force budgets, of course, explain why violent crime levels are much lower in Europe than in the United States. Rhetorical question for MAGA: if the presence of military forces is so effective at reducing crime, why haven’t previous American presidents tried this ingenious method of combating crime?? Rhetorical answer: because the history books are filled with lessons on the dangers of allowing standing armies to preside in urban civilian settings. Much of our U.S. Bill of Rights was inspired by these historical lessons! Foucault’s imperial boomerang theory, as applied to WW2 fascism and apropos to Trump Redux, only reinforces these lessons that our Founding Fathers understood well in 1789. What I actually find most alarming among MAGA, more so than their cultish disregard for Constitutional principles, is their emergent dehumanizing language toward homeless people. Low empathy and low intelligence are dual dangerous ingredients used in the concoction of creeping fascism. So wakey-wakey, MAGA a-hole dullards!! If you normalize authoritarian tactics, that tyrannical boomerang is coming back your way. Oh, Empress AOC will make sure of it… If Democrat Mayor's and AG's that pursue anti-policing policies, coddle and nurse criminals, and fail to prosecute criminal acts, allowing for example looting to be deemed shopping sprees did not disregard the law and the safety of their citizens no intervention at the Federal level would be necessary. The message to them is drop the social experiment and do your job. As for AOC, let's wait until she has an original idea before the coronation. 1
Albwan Posted August 18 Posted August 18 On 8/17/2025 at 11:45 AM, B-Man said: Theres no doubt theres a lot of dumb ***** white peoples. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted August 18 Posted August 18 1 hour ago, Albwan said: Theres no doubt theres a lot of dumb ***** white peoples. We have plenty of proof of that on this website alone 1
Recommended Posts