Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, boyst said:

You have to be fluffy to be that heavy and he isn't.

 

I've ranged from 203 and sub 5% bf to 220 and 12-14%.

 

To be as tall as he is and as lean as he is eating the diet I am sure he is eating he simply doesn't have the mass to be 240

 

Knox is 254 which I don't fully believe either, but he is fluffier

Kincaid weighed in at the combine at 246

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, boyst said:

You have to be fluffy to be that heavy and he isn't.

 

I've ranged from 203 and sub 5% bf to 220 and 12-14%.

 

To be as tall as he is and as lean as he is eating the diet I am sure he is eating he simply doesn't have the mass to be 240

 

Knox is 254 which I don't fully believe either, but he is fluffier

I think we are agreeing on him by the way.

 

I have had your exact profile at different ages, 5% or less and 12-14% BF. When I was 200 with sub 5% body fat I was totally shredded. If I added another 25 pounds to that frame which is his equivalent at 6'4 240 I would have been barely able to move my arms. He's 220 or less for sure.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, boyst said:

At 6'4" 240 combined with his frame, that's not very thick.

 

Sam laporta is 6'3 245 and looks a whole lot bigger

 

240 at his size is tiny. 

So Josh Allen is tiny now?  

Posted
2 minutes ago, kitchen sink said:

So Josh Allen is tiny now?  

Lets see a recent photo of Josh and Dalton.  Josh looks every bit of 6'4 240.  Dalton does not.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Andrew Son said:

Kincaid weighed in at the combine at 246

 

7 minutes ago, Andrew Son said:

lol

Because no player in NFL history has done everything possible to make the perception of them as strong as they could at the combine. 

Posted
Just now, Mikie2times said:

 

Because no player in NFL history has done everything possible to make the perception of them as strong as they could at the combine. 

Yes, I'm sure he's down about 30lbs from the combine.

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

 

It's not possible that he is pound over 220. Use the scale and do it yourself. 

 

I'm 6 feet, fairly athletic build, 186LB, look basically just like him. If he was 240, that would be similar to 225 for me on the scale below (pounds per inch). If I was 225 I would look more like a LB. Hell I can't even imagine. 

 

image.png.a4c4deb508520d3ad8feea798bebf7f3.png

 

Lmao that graph doesn't prove anything 

 

I know people who are 6' 240 lb and 5 ft 9 240 lb and the 5 ft 9 guy holds it better you think he would look fatter

 

People always think I'm 20 lb over what I actually am 

 

I've seen Dalton around Western New York plenty of times and he's bigger than Matt Milano and Milano is definitely 220

Edited by Buffalo716
Posted
23 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

he'll never be George kittle but his effort actually allows him to get on the field and block at an average level

Quibble over Kincaid as Kittle? 🤔

Quaint. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

He’s simply lazy. But we’re stuck with him for at least 2 more years. I’m fairly certain we’ll ‘Tremain’ him, let him seek a new contract then waive goodbye. 
[see high comp pick]

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

He’s simply lazy. But we’re stuck with him for at least 2 more years. I’m fairly certain we’ll ‘Tremain’ him, let him seek a new contract then waive goodbye. 
[see high comp pick]

 

We picked up Tremaine's 5th Year Option before we let him walk. If Dalton looks like he did last season this year, that won't be happening.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 4
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, gjv said:

I've gotten the impression that Kincaid plays more like a large wide-out than a tight-end. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

This is it right here. He’s more of a split end than a tight end. 

Edited by Snappysnackcakes
Autocorrect got me
Posted

I realize we picked up Edmunds 5 th year and we’ll likely do the same with Kincaid, unless someone more appealing enters the picture. 
‘Tremain’ him.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

Lmao that graph doesn't prove anything 

 

I know people who are 6' 240 lb and 5 ft 9 240 lb and the 5 ft 9 guy holds it better you think he would look fatter

 

People always think I'm 20 lb over what I actually am 

 

I've seen Dalton around Western New York plenty of times and he's bigger than Matt Milano and Milano is definitely 220

I think you're 40 LB's over what you actually are

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

I think you're 40 LB's over what you actually are

Dude I've always been considered skinnier side lol I still run 3 miles a day 

 

Never even hit 200 lb in my life

Edited by Buffalo716

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...