Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Billsatlastin2018 said:

Diggs always looks open and is now #12 in the NFL with 59 Receptions and 659 yards. Again, the top rated Bill is Shakir at #41. The Patriots have 2 more WRs just behind Diggs. Hollins is one of them.

 

Thanks Beanbrain.

IF and it's still a big IF, the Bills fall apart and miss he playoffs the straw that would break the camels back and cost Bean his job would be the decision not to resign Hollins.  The guy would have been cheap, was productive in Buffalo as a WR #3 and on special teams, and has continued to be productive in NE. Another straw would be the Coleman pick over both Worthy & McConkey.

 

But the reason I think this is all a big IF is that I have a feeling the Bills are about to go on a run and will win the Division.

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, LEBills said:


yes he did, but when just saying who was the more productive WR, Diggs is more productive. Sure there may be reasons for it but the stats are what they are. No slight on the 90s teams. We will look back on the Diggs era fondly in 30 years too.

I disagree.  Reed more ten matched Diggs in the playoffs.

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

IF and it's still a big IF, the Bills fall apart and miss he playoffs the straw that would break the camels back and cost Bean his job would be the decision not to resign Hollins.  The guy would have been cheap, was productive in Buffalo as a WR #3 and on special teams, and has continued to be productive in NE. Another straw would be the Coleman pick over both Worthy & McConkey.

 

But the reason I think this is all a big IF is that I have a feeling the Bills are about to go on a run and will win the Division.

 

 

 

 

I disagree.  Reed more ten matched Diggs in the playoffs.

 


Yea that was my biggest gripe with Diggs as a Bills receiver too. If you want to focus on that that is fine, but there is a reason playoff and regular season records are separate. If you think Reed is our most prolific playoff receiver I would agree. Moulds still holds the single game receiving record there which is cool

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, H2o said:

Given his age, and his type of injury, the fact Diggs came back so quickly to play at the level he is right now is pretty remarkable. He's been a full go since TC, and that was just 10 months removed his ACL tear. He is the leading receiver for NE and is on pace for another 1,000 yard season. Good for him. 

 

Yes, his time was done here. He had become as much a detriment to the locker room as he was prior to being jettisoned by Minnesota. The difference is Minnesota was able to flip our pick into Justin Jefferson. Our pick ended up becoming another defensive lineman. 

 

The Pats are still in the "unicorns farting rainbows" phase. Let's see how Diggs behaves when things go sideways.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

The Pats are still in the "unicorns farting rainbows" phase. Let's see how Diggs behaves when things go sideways.

Time is running out this year for this "go sideways" thought. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

IF and it's still a big IF, the Bills fall apart and miss he playoffs the straw that would break the camels back and cost Bean his job would be the decision not to resign Hollins.  The guy would have been cheap, was productive in Buffalo as a WR #3 and on special teams, and has continued to be productive in NE. Another straw would be the Coleman pick over both Worthy & McConkey.

 

But the reason I think this is all a big IF is that I have a feeling the Bills are about to go on a run and will win the Division.

 

 

 

 

I disagree.  Reed more ten matched Diggs in the playoffs.

 

Of all the bad decisions and missed picks Beane has had, not re-signing Mack Hollins isn't going to be what costs him his job. 

 

From the sounds of it, they made Hollins an offer and it was Hollins's choice to head to New England. 

 

Maybe Hollins and his representative told the Bills the offer the Patriots made and Beane passed. Maybe Hollins got the offer and jumped on it. But no one can force a guy to stay if he wants to go. 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

The Pats are still in the "unicorns farting rainbows" phase. Let's see how Diggs behaves when things go sideways.

 

He always starts on his best behavior with full effort. This should be no surprise to anyone, but how long will it last?  Let’s not forget he turns 32 in a couple weeks. This will most likely be his last little hurrah before his decline. I hope he melts down again before retiring so he can be remembered for what he was: extremely talented but usually a PITA to have around. 

 

 

.

Edited by Augie
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

Of all the bad decisions and missed picks Beane has had, not re-signing Mack Hollins isn't going to be what costs him his job. 

 

From the sounds of it, they made Hollins an offer and it was Hollins's choice to head to New England. 

 

Maybe Hollins and his representative told the Bills the offer the Patriots made and Beane passed. Maybe Hollins got the offer and jumped on it. But no one can force a guy to stay if he wants to go. 

The Patriots had an incredible amount of cap space and they knew Mack Hollins was a valuable piece for us

 

They were always going to outbid us for his services. It was up to Hollins to decide if he wanted to stay with the Bills or go to the highest bidder

 

It would have stupid for Beane to get in a bidding war for him with a team that had basically unlimited cap space

 

The Bills sometimes bet on their culture to win out and get guys to return for less than they can potentially get on the open market. Hollins didn't buy into it

 

Simple as that

  • Agree 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, BeastMaster said:

The Patriots had an incredible amount of cap space and they knew Mack Hollins was a valuable piece for us

 

They were always going to outbid us for his services. It was up to Hollins to decide if he wanted to stay with the Bills or go to the highest bidder

 

It would have stupid for Beane to get in a bidding war for him with a team that had basically unlimited cap space

 

The Bills sometimes bet on their culture to win out and get guys to return for less than they can potentially get on the open market. Hollins didn't buy into it

 

Simple as that

 

lol nonsense

 

The Pats weren’t going to continuously upping their big just to steal him away. They gave him a paltry offer and the Bills must have offered nothing or a tiny amount.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, BeastMaster said:

The Patriots had an incredible amount of cap space and they knew Mack Hollins was a valuable piece for us

 

They were always going to outbid us for his services. It was up to Hollins to decide if he wanted to stay with the Bills or go to the highest bidder

 

It would have stupid for Beane to get in a bidding war for him with a team that had basically unlimited cap space

 

The Bills sometimes bet on their culture to win out and get guys to return for less than they can potentially get on the open market. Hollins didn't buy into it

 

Simple as that

Exactly this. 

 

It's also easy to talk without knowing of how things played out. Let's say for the sake of argument, Beane DID win a bidding war. He would have likely had to vastly overpay. Now he sunk all that money into Hollins and Hollins gets injured here. Now he's overpaid and sitting on IR. Pitchforks would still be out in full force that we overpaid a JAG that's sitting on IR.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

Of all the bad decisions and missed picks Beane has had, not re-signing Mack Hollins isn't going to be what costs him his job. 

 

From the sounds of it, they made Hollins an offer and it was Hollins's choice to head to New England. 

 

Maybe Hollins and his representative told the Bills the offer the Patriots made and Beane passed. Maybe Hollins got the offer and jumped on it. But no one can force a guy to stay if he wants to go. 

I agree that failing to sign Hollins alone would not cost Bean his job I said it could be the straw that broke the camels back.  Sometimes getting the simple stuff wrong is the most annoying. 

 

As for Hollins staying, I'm not convinced he didn't want to and it's hard for me to believe he would have left if offered the same pay and assurances that he would be given a chance to be a bigger part of the Bills offense.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

The Pats are still in the "unicorns farting rainbows" phase. Let's see how Diggs behaves when things go sideways.

They may not go sideways, so to speak. Maye is in year two, Henderson is in year one, the defense has a good mix and is solid, Vrabel is a good coach, and McDaniels is back to doing his thing. They are also expected to have $65M+ in FA next year. Things are truly looking up in NE and I think Diggs will be happy to be along for that ride. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, H2o said:

They may not go sideways, so to speak. Maye is in year two, Henderson is in year one, the defense has a good mix and is solid, Vrabel is a good coach, and McDaniels is back to doing his thing. They are also expected to have $65M+ in FA next year. Things are truly looking up in NE and I think Diggs will be happy to be along for that ride. 

 

Not with their remaining schedule. They will coast to the division title. They won't be challenged until the playoffs.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...