Jump to content

FBI informant being indicted for providing false info on Bidens


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

 

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/special-counsel-charges-fbi-confidential-source-alexander-smirnov/story?id=107275129

 

 

The article says Republicans claim this doesn't undermine their investigation.   It does.  But two tiered justice system!!!!!!!

 

Step 1 of charges against Joe falling apart.

Do you think people at the FBI would lie about something like this in order to keep Trump out of office?

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

FBI supervisory analyst Brian Auten testified that Steele never got the money because he could not “prove the allegations.”  In your psycho cult world these things are somehow the same.  I got a suspicion that they gave him every chance in the world to prove his allegations, and he failed.  Now the whole world will get to know the truth, because unlike conspiracy world, there will be a trial with transcripts, and the accused will be able to defend himself.  

27 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Do you think people at the FBI would lie about something like this in order to keep Trump out of office?

Lie about what exactly?  If they were afraid of the truth being public, they sure as hell wouldn't have charged him, and gave him a chance to prove this accusations under oath with public evidence.  Stop living in bizarro world. 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, daz28 said:

FBI supervisory analyst Brian Auten testified that Steele never got the money because he could not “prove the allegations.”  In your psycho cult world these things are somehow the same.  I got a suspicion that they gave him every chance in the world to prove his allegations, and he failed.  Now the whole world will get to know the truth, because unlike conspiracy world, there will be a trial with transcripts, and the accused will be able to defend himself.  

Lie about what exactly?  If they were afraid of the truth being public, they sure as hell wouldn't have charged him, and gave him a chance to prove this accusations under oath with public evidence.  Stop living in bizarro world. 

Clearly you agree that the FBI would do this and then drop the charges right after the election, because no one believes this trial happens before the election. I will bet you whatever you would like that the trial does not happen before the election. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Clearly you agree that the FBI would do this and then drop the charges right after the election, because no one believes this trial happens before the election. I will bet you whatever you would like that the trial does not happen before the election. 

They're going to drop the charges after the election???  Should have took my advice, and left bizarro world.  It's looking like maybe Bobulinski lied too, but he is already claiming a tiny clerical error by the FBI agent.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

I really don't think I could sum it up better than this.

 

 

 

 

You can't sum it up better because you still pretend Hunters laptop is Russian disinformation, the entire 2016 investigation of Trump was not a political operation, and act like Biden did not brag publicly about using American money to get the guy who was investigating his son fired. But yes no evidence Biden ever was involved. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

I really don't think I could sum it up better than this.

 

 

 

 

 

Please. you guys spent four years with every dem politiican saying they had the smoking gun on the news every single night and that russia fixed the election. Every little rumor stated as fact and then we find out years later it was all bull####. This is not even close to the ***** the dems pulled. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some random thoughts.

 

According to the FBI Smirnov is a "highly credible" confidential source the FBI has worked with since 2010.  All indications are his information has proven correct, with it appears this one exception.   

 

Curious to understand how they know he's lying about the Biden's as Weis and others investigating the situation sandbagged his "information" until now at a point were Congress was made aware of the informant's statement. 

 

This was the lead-in on Good Morning America which is telling.  I wonder if most of their viewers were even aware of Joe Biden being investigated before this morning?  

 

So he won't be testifying to Congress anytime soon and the risk of that happening might have provided incentive to take him off the board now.  Other than that, its more than likely he'll be held without bail with prosecutors citing a high potential flight risk suspect and the judge agreeing so I'm wondering how long before this guy falls into depression and hangs himself in prison?

 

If indeed the Washington powers are still trying to protect Joe that signals there is no "Plan B" to replace him on the November ballot and they're all-in and past the point of no return to get him re-elected and deal with getting rid of him later.  Keeping Trump out of the White House is more important than having a coherent and functioning President.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Some random thoughts.

 

According to the FBI Smirnov is a "highly credible" confidential source the FBI has worked with since 2010.  All indications are his information has proven correct, with it appears this one exception.   

 

Curious to understand how they know he's lying about the Biden's as Weis and others investigating the situation sandbagged his "information" until now at a point were Congress was made aware of the informant's statement. 

 

This was the lead-in on Good Morning America which is telling.  I wonder if most of their viewers were even aware of Joe Biden being investigated before this morning?  

 

So he won't be testifying to Congress anytime soon and the risk of that happening might have provided incentive to take him off the board now.  Other than that, its more than likely he'll be held without bail with prosecutors citing a high potential flight risk suspect and the judge agreeing so I'm wondering how long before this guy falls into depression and hangs himself in prison?

 

If indeed the Washington powers are still trying to protect Joe that signals there is no "Plan B" to replace him on the November ballot and they're all-in and past the point of no return to get him re-elected and deal with getting rid of him later.  Keeping Trump out of the White House is more important than having a coherent and functioning President.

Or rather than it being a giant complex conspiracy, the guy could just be a massive liar or have been paid off this time to lie.  why not wait for the trial and the evidence?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Or rather than it being a giant complex conspiracy, the guy could just be a massive liar or have been paid off this time to lie.  why not wait for the trial and the evidence?

Because it's easier to squirm, and create more conspiracy theories, and then when you miss the football yet again, you just sigh, "good grief".  Then you just start with a fresh new conspiracy theory and whataboutisms.  Rinse and repeat.  It's 100% all they got, and they're too blind/stupid to see it.  The best part of it is this stuff will be on the internet for ETERNITY.  Their continuous idiocy is recorded like a snapshot in time.  The same dummies doing it are the same people saying they're glad they didn't have cell phones when they were young.  Why?  You'd have still done the same dumb stuff you did, that we all knew about anyways.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

***** Smirov? Russian stooge? 

 

Smirnov is the same person that Republicans have called "a highly credible FBI source" and have used to claim Joe Biden is corrupt, according to multiple senior congressional sources.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...