Tiberius Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 23 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said: I bet you get your ass kicked a lot. Nope, wrong 24 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said: Actually buddy, im extremely intelligent. Oh? Sure 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan_34 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Nope, wrong Oh? Sure Well that’s me next to the aircraft. Highest scores needed for avionics. You lack substance to your argument, like most posters on here point out. You are pathetic; part of me feels sorry for trolls like you. You would never say this stuff to someones face; that’s a fact. Later douche. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 (edited) 20 hours ago, Doc said: He was talking about getting out of the ME and letting them blow each other up. Not isolating themselves from the entire world. I agree there's a lot of real estate to stake out strategy and policy between the choice of getting involved everywhere and isolationism. But that's the binary choice people making the argument for constant intervention and conflict attempt to present. They might want to consider by their standards perhaps the entire world minus 5 or 6 countries pursue a policy they might call isolationism. Edited January 30 by All_Pro_Bills 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 33 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said: Well that’s me next to the aircraft. Highest scores needed for avionics. You lack substance to your argument, like most posters on here point out. You are pathetic; part of me feels sorry for trolls like you. You would never say this stuff to someones face; that’s a fact. Later douche. Lol, ok. Another poster? Switch names? lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 It’s gonna be the worst hand slap they’ve ever known….. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 The real Conald Trump: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Trump doubles down on calling Hezbollah ‘very smart’ Also Hezbollah: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 …..we shall see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 (edited) 55 minutes ago, BillStime said: Trump doubles down on calling Hezbollah ‘very smart’ Also Hezbollah: Maybe they are smart? But assigning that attribute to your enemies should not be confused as an endorsement of them or of support for them. Its merely good business to understand your adversary and perform a realistic assessment of their capabilities. Anything short of dealing with the reality of your foes capabilities generally leads to getting your ass handed to you in any competition or conflict. Look no further for an example than how our current bumbling administration is handling everything. The Iranians know that no matter how much the war hawks hoot and holler Joe's crew won't do too much damage to them because anything impacting world oil prices will doom him to defeat in November. Edited January 31 by All_Pro_Bills 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Maybe they are smart? But assigning that attribute to your enemies should not be confused as an endorsement of them or of support for them. Its merely good business to understand your adversary and perform a realistic assessment of their capabilities. Anything short of dealing with the reality of your foes capabilities generally leads to getting your ass handed to you in any competition or conflict. Look no further for an example than how our current bumbling administration is handling everything. The Iranians know that no matter how much the war hawks hoot and holler Joe's crew won't do too much damage to them because anything impacting world oil prices will doom him to defeat in November. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 It's interesting how media outside the us and EU are saying this strike was on an illegal base in Syria. Not Jordan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 I have no idea how this is a successful strategy. The strike occurs, the Americans are killed. The Administration should have responded immediately. It is impossible for me to think that target folders were not ready, and we have the assets in the area. Then we announce we are going to respond. Two days later we announce we have decided to respond. Meanwhile, the option to hide has been available for five days. The only logical explanation, and it is a major tactical error, is that we are aligning others to participate. I am reserving judgement, but this "response" in not easily explained. 1 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDD Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 (edited) So, B-1 bombers? Weigh in on that Sherpa. Combined with other assets? What are your thoughts? Edited February 2 by LDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irv Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 14 minutes ago, LDD said: So, B-1 bombers? Weigh in on that Sherpa. Combined with other assets? What are your thoughts? Nukes dropped from B-1 bombers - maybe. Much prefer cruise missiles. I think some indiscriminate strafing might help too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 11 minutes ago, LDD said: So, B-1 bombers from the continent? Weigh in on that Sherpa. Why not assets from carriers in the area or bases closer? It looks like a good number of targets at seven locations were targeted, so the operation probably included a number of our folks. Have to see the entire strike plan, but it seems like a "message" strike as much as a tactical operation. Not a fan. I hate it when it is obvious that a press release was prepared before an operation. Mentioning what targets were hit, how many precision guided weapons were used etc., are tell tale signs of political rather than tactical people behind it. This should have been done immediately, not after four days of press releases claiming we will respond, we have decided to etc. Too much time for the roaches to hide, limiting effectiveness. 7 minutes ago, Irv said: Nukes dropped from B-1 bombers - maybe. Much prefer cruise missiles. I think some indiscriminate strafing might help too. Cruise missiles are very expensive and not the weapon of choice in a low anti air threat. You can get much more damage done using conventionally delivered ordnance, and it's much cheaper. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 You hit us, you will pay. Big time No one wants an all out war, but Iran crossed a line and were hit because of it Cool, calculated response from American leadership 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Someone probably told him to leave his watch at home this time. Wouldn’t want that sort of embarrassment again. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Interesting if true 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts