Jump to content

"Moms” for Liberty - a white supremacist ANTI LGTBQ extremist/hate group


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


“Why are people upset that I’m the chair of a group that invites violence and hatred against teachers?!??”

I’ve been waiting for someone dumber than John from Riverside to show up. To your credit you can at least construct a sentence. Otherwise…

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Nope.

 

He made it up.

 

 

 

 

Melissa Boche of the Los Angeles chapter threatened to gun down librarians. 
 

https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/06/17/a-moms-for-liberty-leader-threatens-gun-violence-against-librarians-audio/

15 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

I’ve been waiting for someone dumber than John from Riverside to show up. To your credit you can at least construct a sentence. Otherwise…


Nice ad hominem. Not surprising to say the least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

There are two primary groups who lash out against Moms for Liberty.

 

One is a group of weak-minded trolls who pounce on whatever they are told to like cats helplessly chasing the red dot at the end of a laser pointer. They are party shills and the moment their leaders point that laser pen they are ready to pounce.

 

The rest of them are sick people who cover their true intentions with "identity." They try to push sexualized materials to children and pull kids into adult scenarios, and then they cover themselves in rainbows so that they can claim the backlash is because of their "identity." Anyone with even a hint of objectivity can do minimal research and find many people representing many diverse groups who stand against the same things that you do.

 

 

https://twitter.com/BreaktheProblem/status/1730607737191420406

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Melissa Boche of the Los Angeles chapter threatened to gun down librarians. 
 

https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/06/17/a-moms-for-liberty-leader-threatens-gun-violence-against-librarians-audio/

Thank you for providing this compelling evidence to back up your claim. Did you know that this B word was also an anti-mask activist? Literal Nazi!

 

I would also like to thank you for the link as it backs up my claim that you are a moron. It’s likely that you did not read the article but if you did read it your reading comprehension blows. That particular Nazi lives in Arkansas not Los Angeles. Really nice work on your part. Go back to pretending to read the LA Blade and enjoy. 

Edited by JDHillFan
a moron
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Thank you for providing this compelling evidence to back up your claim. Did you know that this B word was also an anti-mask activist? Literal Nazi!

 

I would also like to thank you for the link as it backs up my claim that you are a moron. It’s likely that you did not read the article but if you did read it your reading comprehension blows. That particular Nazi lives in Arkansas not Los Angeles. Really nice work on your part. Go back to pretending to read the LA Blade and enjoy. 


Okay buddy, keep pretending your side is in any way the majority and not just a bunch of toddlers screeching about bedtime 

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 


Family so long as they’re white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants***

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Ah, the old "projection" claim when the point hits to close to home.

 

Sad, but consistent.

 

 

 

Meanwhile:

 

you're the sad confused one bonnie girl...everyone else understands the differences,  the things aren't linked.  stop lying.  why do you try to protect the terrible?   it makes u terrible too.  you're on the wrong side of every moral and ethical issue.  did u learn nothing at that 3rd rate school? u  sure u didn't actually go to Hillsdale?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 


Family so long as they’re white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants***

 

 

And this is the poster PPP, who was whining about "projection" earlier.

 

There is NO evidence of this implied racism by Roundy, none whatsoever.

 

So, he invents it, because he can't really argue against Parents looking out for their children against porn.

 

 

 

33 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

you're the sad confused one bonnie girl...everyone else understands the differences,  the things aren't linked.  stop lying.  why do you try to protect the terrible?   it makes u terrible too.  you're on the wrong side of every moral and ethical issue.  did u learn nothing at that 3rd rate school? u  sure u didn't actually go to Hillsdale?

 

And this ?, well I don't really have to point it out do I ?

 

The stream of thoughts, incomplete sentences and illogical comparisons, all capped by an attempted insult.

 

I think that we have all seen the  deterioration  in Joe's posts.

 

I , for one, will keep him in my prayers.

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

And this is the poster PPP, who was whining about "projection" earlier.

 

There is NO evidence of this implied racism by Roundy, none whatsoever.

 

So, he invents it, because he can't really argue against Parents looking out for their children against porn.

 

 

 

 

And this ?, well I don't really have to point it out do I ?

 

The stream of thoughts, incomplete sentences and illogical comparisons, all capped by an attempted insult.

 

I think that we have all seen the  deterioration  in Joe's posts.

 

I , for one, will keep him in my prayers.

 

 

 

 

yes DR Freud, I'll pray for you too.  You need it more than I.  look towards the light....and you want to prescribe behavior to the entire population....

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roundybout said:

Okay buddy, keep pretending your side is in any way the majority and not just a bunch of toddlers screeching about bedtime 

You are in the position of telling moms they are wrong in their concern for their kids schooling, and telling schools/teachers/librarians they are right for stocking their elementary schools with materials detailing oral and anal. 
 

One of us is definitely in the majority here. 
 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You are in the position of telling moms they are wrong in their concern for their kids schooling, and telling schools/teachers/librarians they are right for stocking their elementary schools with materials detailing oral and anal. 
 

One of us is definitely in the majority here. 
 

what about parents who have no problem with it.  who will control what their kids read regardless.  that's the ideal, non?  responsible parents making THEIR own decisions for THEIR kids.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

what about parents who have no problem with it.  who will control what their kids read regardless.  that's the ideal, non?  responsible parents making THEIR own decisions for THEIR kids.....

It seems as though you are agreeing with me without realizing it. Parents deciding is good. Schools wanting to get into oral/anal discussion seems less good, non?
 

They can bring all the child appropriate anal/oral books in the world into their home. None of them are banned here in the US. Seems odd for a homophobe like yourself to think it important to have them in elementary schools. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

It seems as though you are agreeing with me without realizing it. Parents deciding is good. Schools wanting to get into oral/anal discussion seems less good, non?
 

They can bring all the child appropriate anal/oral books in the world into their home. None of them are banned here in the US. Seems odd for a homophobe like yourself to think it important to have them in elementary schools. 

it's about principle.  u should try it....and who decides what is appropriate?  you or me or the hari Krishnas and the kama sutra.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

it's about principle.  u should try it....and who decides what is appropriate?  you or me or the hari Krishnas and the kama sutra.


Kids can’t get into r rated movies, porn shops, strip clubs etc. plenty of rules for that stuff. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The usual suspects here (and elsewhere) continue to push their false narratives regarding this organization

 

Here is a link for those of you interested.

 

You won't really be surprised about how they have been mischaracterized here.

 

It's what the Left does.

 

 

https://portal.momsforliberty.org/about/

 

Who We Are

 

We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends

  
Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.

Our founders are Tiffany and Tina, moms on a mission to stoke the fires of liberty.  As former school board members, they witnessed how short-sighted and destructive policies directly hurt children and families. Now they are using their first-hand knowledge and experience to unite parents who are ready to fight those that stand in the way of liberty. 

 

 

Our Mission

Moms for Liberty is dedicated to fighting for the survival of America by unifying, educating and empowering parents to defend their parental rights at all levels of government. 

 

Our Vision

Americans empowered and thriving in a culture of Liberty.

 

Our Values

As Joyful Warriors:

We Stand for Truth

We Build Relationships

We Empower Others

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

it's about principle.  u should try it....and who decides what is appropriate?  you or me or the hari Krishnas and the kama sutra.

You have positioned yourself such that you think it important to have, in elementary schools, materials discussing anal/oral. So be it. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

You are in the position of telling moms they are wrong in their concern for their kids schooling, and telling schools/teachers/librarians they are right for stocking their elementary schools with materials detailing oral and anal. 
 

One of us is definitely in the majority here. 
 


No, my side is the one that doesn’t make up an enemy to attack in the name of “protecting children.” You don’t care about children, we knew that after Sandy Hook. You’re doing this to attack gay folks. That’s always been the goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roundybout said:


No, my side is the one that doesn’t make up an enemy to attack in the name of “protecting children.” You don’t care about children, we knew that after Sandy Hook. You’re doing this to attack gay folks. That’s always been the goal. 

 

We gotta winner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


No, my side is the one that doesn’t make up an enemy to attack in the name of “protecting children.” You don’t care about children, we knew that after Sandy Hook. You’re doing this to attack gay folks. That’s always been the goal. 

I have no doubt that you come at this from a different position than I. Linking to The Blade was a tell. Nobody cares, least of all me. It doesn’t make you a victim however so please don’t try to play the role. Not having sexual materials in elementary schools is not an attack on gay people no matter how much you want it to be. These materials have not been part of school in decades prior. Are modern sensibilities such that they need to be now? Rhetorical question. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

I have no doubt that you come at this from a different position than I. Linking to The Blade was a tell. Nobody cares, least of all me. It doesn’t make you a victim however so please don’t try to play the role. Not having sexual materials in elementary schools is not an attack on gay people no matter how much you want it to be. These materials have not been part of school in decades prior. Are modern sensibilities such that they need to be now? Rhetorical question. 


hoax 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

I have no doubt that you come at this from a different position than I. Linking to The Blade was a tell. Nobody cares, least of all me. It doesn’t make you a victim however so please don’t try to play the role. Not having sexual materials in elementary schools is not an attack on gay people no matter how much you want it to be. These materials have not been part of school in decades prior. Are modern sensibilities such that they need to be now? Rhetorical question. 

 

 

We got a winner 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

I have no doubt that you come at this from a different position than I. Linking to The Blade was a tell. Nobody cares, least of all me. It doesn’t make you a victim however so please don’t try to play the role. Not having sexual materials in elementary schools is not an attack on gay people no matter how much you want it to be. These materials have not been part of school in decades prior. Are modern sensibilities such that they need to be now? Rhetorical question. 

Do you support the Bible in elementary school?

 

I’m not saying you do maybe you don’t

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@BillStime @Roundybout @Joe Ferguson forever how much should discuss my sex life with the 15 year olds I teach? I think it is the exact same that the gay teachers should discuss with kids but maybe we are discussing different things here. 

1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

Do you support the Bible in elementary school?

 

I’m not saying you do maybe you don’t

Where is the bible taught in public schools? Except for the very boring history of the Bible class, which is not religious 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Do you support the Bible in elementary school?

 

I’m not saying you do maybe you don’t

I support the teaching of reading, ‘riting, ‘rithmetic. Perhaps if we focus on those things we won’t get our future ass kicked by China. Sadly, people on your side of the political spectrum are more interested in promoting nonsense like the need for sexual materials in elementary schools. 
 

 

Edited by JDHillFan
spelling
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

I support the teaching of reading, ‘riting, ‘rithmetic. Perhaps if we focus on those things we won’t get our future ass kicked by China. Sadly, people on your side of the political spectrum are more interested in promoting nonsense like the need for sexual materials in elementary schools. 
 

 

I agree that that’s what should be taught

11 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

@BillStime @Roundybout @Joe Ferguson forever how much should discuss my sex life with the 15 year olds I teach? I think it is the exact same that the gay teachers should discuss with kids but maybe we are discussing different things here. 

Where is the bible taught in public schools? Except for the very boring history of the Bible class, which is not religious 

Let’s not be naïve
It’s not the class it’s about it in the school library. do You support it in the school library.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I agree that that’s what should be taught

Let’s not be naïve
It’s not the class it’s about it in the school library. do You support it in the school library.

Do I support porn in the school library? No I don't support porn. I work in a school, I am not naive, I know exactly how many books have been removed from all 3 schools my children have attended over the years. How many do you think have been removed from my high school? Or the local middle school?  I also have to admire your inability to answer a simple question

Edited by Orlando Tim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

Do I support porn in the school library? No I don't support porn. I work in a school, I am not naive, I know exactly how many books have been removed from all 3 schools my children have attended over the years. How many do you think have been removed from my high school? Or the local middle school?  I also have to admire your inability to answer a simple question

It’s interesting how you say that whenever you never answered mine
 

Specifically, I am saying do you think the Bible should be in the school library?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

@BillStime @Roundybout @Joe Ferguson forever how much should discuss my sex life with the 15 year olds I teach? I think it is the exact same that the gay teachers should discuss with kids but maybe we are discussing different things here. 

Where is the bible taught in public schools? Except for the very boring history of the Bible class, which is not religious 

 

7 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

It’s interesting how you say that whenever you never answered mine
 

Specifically, I am saying do you think the Bible should be in the school library?

I did answer indirectly but direct answer I don't care if younger kids have access since most don't understand the language used, if your point is that it has adultery and everything else in it, than fine remove it but comparing the Bible to gender ***** is quite the admission of ignorance. My school has a class called "religions of the world" which requires students to read some of the Quran, Bible, Torah, and other religious texts, so why does that bother you?

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

I have no doubt that you come at this from a different position than I. Linking to The Blade was a tell. Nobody cares, least of all me. It doesn’t make you a victim however so please don’t try to play the role. Not having sexual materials in elementary schools is not an attack on gay people no matter how much you want it to be. These materials have not been part of school in decades prior. Are modern sensibilities such that they need to be now? Rhetorical question. 

Diary of Anne frank is sexual?  Same question. Who defines sexual?  U😒?

 

just so u know, without sex, humanity doesn’t exist

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Diary of Anne frank is sexual?  Same question. Who defines sexual?  U😒?

 

just so u know, without sex, humanity doesn’t exist

You have checked in on the side of wanting literature discussing anal/oral available at elementary schools. You are entitled to your opinion. Again, it seems weird to me coming from you, as you are quite clearly a homophobe. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You have checked in on the side of wanting literature discussing anal/oral available at elementary schools. You are entitled to your opinion. Again, it seems weird to me coming from you, as you are quite clearly a homophobe. 


hoax 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You have checked in on the side of wanting literature discussing anal/oral available at elementary schools. You are entitled to your opinion. Again, it seems weird to me coming from you, as you are quite clearly a homophobe. 

I didn’t define “sexual”. U did. And I don’t agree with your definition 

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Banning books, wtf? Yeah, that really stops kids lol. They have the internet and most can outsmart their parents, especially online. They will get their hands on whatever, banning only makes them want to try harder. Sure, parents rights and all, but generally kids dgaf.

 

Heck, without internet we got porn at waaaaay too young an age (7 maybe?). And i *think* i turned out fine. Had to wait till about 11 or 12 for the anarchist cookbook. And then the supreme disappointment at probably 13 when i read the famously banned (and only wanted it because it was banned) "Catcher in the Rye".

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dickleyjones said:

Banning books, wtf? Yeah, that really stops kids lol. They have the internet and most can outsmart their parents, especially online. They will get their hands on whatever, banning only makes them want to try harder. Sure, parents rights and all, but generally kids dgaf.

 

Heck, without internet we got porn at waaaaay too young an age (7 maybe?). And i *think* i turned out fine. Had to wait till about 11 or 12 for the anarchist cookbook. And then the supreme disappointment at probably 13 when i read the famously banned (and only wanted it because it was banned) "Catcher in the Rye".

You definitely did not turn out fine!

  • Vomit 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dickleyjones said:

Banning books, wtf? Yeah, that really stops kids lol. They have the internet and most can outsmart their parents, especially online. They will get their hands on whatever, banning only makes them want to try harder. Sure, parents rights and all, but generally kids dgaf.

 

Heck, without internet we got porn at waaaaay too young an age (7 maybe?). And i *think* i turned out fine. Had to wait till about 11 or 12 for the anarchist cookbook. And then the supreme disappointment at probably 13 when i read the famously banned (and only wanted it because it was banned) "Catcher in the Rye".

Or their parents can buy the books for home reading. As many copies as they want since nothing is banned. Saves precious education dollars for more important things. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...