Jump to content

Star Wars movies and shows


Just Jack

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

It's sci-fi.  Anything is possible. 😁

 

5 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

 

Maybe a clone of him died.

eh I'm sure they can come up with something, definitely wouldn't just say ***** it he's back or anything though...that'd be lazy.

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A vocal set of Star Wars “fans” just love to crap on the sequels and Daisy Ridley, but I for one (for the most part, but Ruin Johnson did really screw things up pretty bad) enjoyed them. Watching some of the deleted scenes, including Luke’s third lesson that didn’t make it in 🙄😠, helped. Twenty minutes of Canto Bight that was entirely pointless but he skimped on Luke and Jedi training.
 

So happy that she’s getting another turn at it and this time with Dave Filoni now at the full creative controls for all of SW. Better writing, better & more cohesive plot, and now filming in The Volume makes so many more things possible on budget.
 

(I dunno if Favreau will have much input, as he seems to enjoy / focus on the Mando stuff.)

 

 

IMG_7963.jpeg

Edited by UConn James
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2023 at 12:29 AM, UConn James said:


unimpressed gordon ramsay GIF

Yes. Gold. I’ll also take a silver for only seeing one-half episode total of Star Trek.  It was the one where Frank Gorshin had half white and half black face.  I got bored and switched to WWWF.  I think Johnny Rodz actually won a match.  Which is remarkable.

 

 

Edited by Irv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Return Of The Jedi will be back in theaters, for the 40th anniversary.  How many will go see it? 

 

SWCE 2023: Star Wars: Return of the Jedi Will Be Back in Theaters for 40th Anniversary Celebration | StarWars.com

 

Quote

Today, fans attending Star Wars Celebration Europe 2023 were the first to learn that the beloved sixth chapter in the Skywalker saga, Return of the Jedi, is heading back to theaters — its first official release in 26 years. Starting April 28, Return of the Jedi will return to select theaters in the US, UK,  and other regions for a limited time, welcoming a whole new generation of fans to enjoy a full theatrical presentation of the iconic film for the very first time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the sequel trilogy isn't so much the protagonist (though Finn is the more natural protagonist than Rey) or even ruining Luke's character but the laziness that led to both of those decisions. Oh, Anakin wasn't the chosen one after all. Oh, look, Palpatine is actually not dead. Oh, the Empire wasn't actually defeated. Oh, Leia never went on to be a great stateswoman. Oh, no, Luke never really made it as a Jedi Master. Han is never redeemed from his criminal past. Let's just reset all of that so we can just hit rewind and run the same story as the original trilogy all over again. Junk collector (moisture farmer) from backwater planet Jakku (Tatooine) encounters a BB-8 (R2 unit) who reveals information that represents the New Republic's (Rebel Alliance's) only hope to destroy the First Order (Empire). Press play, #######s.

  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LeviF said:

The problem with the sequel trilogy isn't so much the protagonist (though Finn is the more natural protagonist than Rey) or even ruining Luke's character but the laziness that led to both of those decisions. Oh, Anakin wasn't the chosen one after all. Oh, look, Palpatine is actually not dead. Oh, the Empire wasn't actually defeated. Oh, Leia never went on to be a great stateswoman. Oh, no, Luke never really made it as a Jedi Master. Han is never redeemed from his criminal past. Let's just reset all of that so we can just hit rewind and run the same story as the original trilogy all over again. Junk collector (moisture farmer) from backwater planet Jakku (Tatooine) encounters a BB-8 (R2 unit) who reveals information that represents the New Republic's (Rebel Alliance's) only hope to destroy the First Order (Empire). Press play, #######s.

I thought the whole point of the sequel trilogy was to establish there actually is no chosen one. There's never a chosen one and the balance will always ebb and flow. It's all grey.

 

That's how they came up with the name Rey. They just took off the G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/13/2023 at 9:37 AM, LeviF said:

The problem with the sequel trilogy isn't so much the protagonist (though Finn is the more natural protagonist than Rey) or even ruining Luke's character but the laziness that led to both of those decisions. Oh, Anakin wasn't the chosen one after all. Oh, look, Palpatine is actually not dead. Oh, the Empire wasn't actually defeated. Oh, Leia never went on to be a great stateswoman. Oh, no, Luke never really made it as a Jedi Master. Han is never redeemed from his criminal past. Let's just reset all of that so we can just hit rewind and run the same story as the original trilogy all over again. Junk collector (moisture farmer) from backwater planet Jakku (Tatooine) encounters a BB-8 (R2 unit) who reveals information that represents the New Republic's (Rebel Alliance's) only hope to destroy the First Order (Empire). Press play, #######s.

 

I would have liked to see how things would have played out if all three movies were designed with the same vision in mind.  Johnson's movie may have worked without the Star Wars label, but you can't just try to reinvent everything  40 years after the fact right in the middle of a planned 3 part story.  Instead we were left with him tearing up everything Abrams started and then Abrams picked right back up as if that never happened. 

 

Me personally, I had no issue with the repetitive nature of that first movie.  It was fun.  They just dropped the ball big time following that up.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, shrader said:

 

I would have liked to see how things would have played out if all three movies were designed with the same vision in mind.  Johnson's movie may have worked without the Star Wars label, but you can't just try to reinvent everything  40 years after the fact right in the middle of a planned 3 part story.  Instead we were left with him tearing up everything Abrams started and then Abrams picked right back up as if that never happened. 

 

Me personally, I had no issue with the repetitive nature of that first movie.  It was fun.  They just dropped the ball big time following that up.

The biggest thing in hindsight was ruining Leia's exit. The sacrifice made by random what's-her-name purple-haired commander would've been the perfect ending for Leia. They seemed to lean into the strength of the female characters and had one of the strongest female characters in sci fi history on tap, yet chose some unknown new character for the big sacrifice...it had no weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...