Tommy Callahan Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 6 minutes ago, Kemp said: https://www.newsweek.com/allen-weisselberg-flip-donald-trump-lawyers-1791411 "It can mean one of two things. Number one, the case is over and doesn't need lawyers anymore, they were just representing them on that one case," Agnifilo said. "Or, more likely, is there was this pressure campaign put on him saying while he's in Rikers, 'do you like being there? Because we're about to bring other charges.' Reads like another blue anon conspiracy void of facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 On 3/29/2023 at 9:06 AM, All_Pro_Bills said: Biden's administration, thru re-inserting neocon Nuland and stepped up arms deliveries, encouraged Ukrainian paramilitary groups to step up attacks on ethnic Russian separatists in the east which began in 2014 and dismissed any diplomatic efforts and conversations between the parties. Escalation followed escalation and events unfolded to where they sit today. Trump's Department of State would have done neither. Now China is stepping into the vacuum and along with new partner France have begun engagement with Ukraine and Russia to broker a peace deal, absent Washington which of course is against any peace deal. You're of the belief that Ukraine started the war? You understand Putin is a dictator, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 (edited) On 3/29/2023 at 9:23 AM, Chris farley said: Is that a reference to the day the Mueller report came out and had nothing? I wonder why you folks always leave out https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/mueller-i-did-not-clear-trump-of-obstruction-of-justice Mueller found plenty. The issue was whether or not a sitting President could be charged. Edited March 30, 2023 by Kemp 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 23 hours ago, Doc said: Interactions with Russia don't even come close to being "collusion." Collusion is having a disgraced British spy get lies from Russians and pass it off as legit intel in order to take down a President. Forget about the word "collusion" for a minute. Does it strike you as a pattern that so many people working for and with Trump were found guilty of crimes that involved Russia? No other administration had anything resembling this. Since no one has chosen to answer, why do you believe Trump refused to have a translator when he spoke with Putin? To my knowledge that has never happened before. Why can't any of you come up with a reasonable explanation for this? Why can't any of you answer any direct questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 2 minutes ago, Kemp said: I wonder why you folks always leave out https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/mueller-i-did-not-clear-trump-of-obstruction-of-justice Mueller found plenty. The issuev was whether or not a sitting President could be charged. I still wonder if and/or when Mueller found out Sussman was working for Hillarie's campaign during that investigation? The issue you mentioned is just another Media/Pac strawman. That one is just another in a long list of expensive DEM theatre. Imagine how much was spent and what else we could have done for Americans vs theatre to get power back. and are failing miserably since regaining said power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 27 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Reads like another blue anon conspiracy void of facts. The FACT is that Trump's lawyers no longer represent Weisselberg. What that means is yet to be determined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 Not according to the article, you shared that was full of assumptions that talked of another conspiracy. At the end of the day. does it get frustrating to have so many things you were told were the truth, only to be later found to be a story. In the boy that cried wolf story, the town stopped believing after 3. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 7 minutes ago, Chris farley said: I still wonder if and/or when Mueller found out Sussman was working for Hillarie's campaign during that investigation? The issue you mentioned is just another Media/Pac strawman. That one is just another in a long list of expensive DEM theatre. Imagine how much was spent and what else we could have done for Americans vs theatre to get power back. and are failing miserably since regaining said power. You don't seem to know what a strawman is. It's a + 9 minutes ago, Chris farley said: I still wonder if and/or when Mueller found out Sussman was working for Hillarie's campaign during that investigation? The issue you mentioned is just another Media/Pac strawman. That one is just another in a long list of expensive DEM theatre. Imagine how much was spent and what else we could have done for Americans vs theatre to get power back. and are failing miserably since regaining said power. A direct quote is a strawman? Do you even what the word means? 1 minute ago, Chris farley said: Not according to the article, you shared that was full of assumptions that talked of another conspiracy. At the end of the day. does it get frustrating to have so many things you were told were the truth, only to be later found to be a story. In the boy that cried wolf story, the town stopped believing after 3. If you recall, I was the one willing to put up money that it's not a boy called wolf situation. I also noticed that you and yours never answer direct questions. Why is that? A posting of an emoji just avoids. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Kemp said: Forget about the word "collusion" for a minute. Does it strike you as a pattern that so many people working for and with Trump were found guilty of crimes that involved Russia? No other administration had anything resembling this. Since no one has chosen to answer, why do you believe Trump refused to have a translator when he spoke with Putin? To my knowledge that has never happened before. Why can't any of you come up with a reasonable explanation for this? Why can't any of you answer any direct questions? They were guilty of lying about talking to Russians because they knew what would happen if they admitted they talked to them (and Flynn talked to them after the election, Manafort was gone a year prior to the election and van der Zwaan had nothing to do with anything). Kind of like lying about an affair while in Office. No one was ever charged with anything even remotely close to "collusion" and Trump never did anything for Russia in exchange for the alleged "collusion." You all got yourselves worked up over nothing and, again, did far more for Putin than he could ever had accomplished by himself. Now, what do you suppose Barry meant when he told Medvedev to tell Putin prior to the 2012 election that he'd have more flexibility after he got re-elected? Flexibility to do what? Edited March 30, 2023 by Doc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 3 hours ago, Chris farley said: Reads like another blue anon conspiracy void of facts. Blue anon, straw man, you just repeat the same shiite that half the time doesn't make sense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Blue anon, straw man, you just repeat the same shiite that half the time doesn't make sense. Its all good, this is where you tossed out the laziest forms of propaganda. the Ad hominem Fallacy. intentional or just learned behavior. and Blue anon is in reference to Q anon. its crazy conspiracy stories being told as truth. here is a list or two to help. https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies Edited March 30, 2023 by Chris farley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 11 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Its all good, this is where you tossed out the laziest forms of propaganda. the Ad hominem Fallacy. intentional or just learned behavior. and Blue anon is in reference to Q anon. its crazy conspiracy stories being told as truth. here is a list or two to help. https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies Yaaaaawn. I'd pick apart your logic but seriously what's the point if you cannot comprehend? It's like explaining a black hole to a hamster or how to drive to a woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 4 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Yaaaaawn. I'd pick apart your logic but seriously what's the point if you cannot comprehend? It's like explaining a black hole to a hamster or how to drive to a woman. And another ad hominem. Its interesting how some in here use propaganda or fallacies NON stop, but claim to be master debaters or something. if the argument was valid and you could prove it, you wouldn't need to use the fallacies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 14 minutes ago, Chris farley said: And another ad hominem. Its interesting how some in here use propaganda or fallacies NON stop, but claim to be master debaters or something. if the argument was valid and you could prove it, you wouldn't need to use the fallacies. Ad hominem and straw man. Please tell your home school teacher to learn ya somethin new. Using terms 100x out of context gets boring. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotAct Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 should be any day now… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 26 minutes ago, RiotAct said: should be any day month now… FIFY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 waiting.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 Well look at this 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 (edited) 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: Well look at this Still unconfirmed, but the jury is voting. Edit: Confirmed Edited March 30, 2023 by Kemp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts